|
We have plenty of millennials and now Gen Z in our neighborhood- regular jobs, student debt, 1 or 2 kids. No great wealth to do it. Our neighborhood is older, houses aren't sexy or iG ready. They are in their late 20s and early 30s.
|
Over decades. I'm sure you'd prefer we live in a cardboard box somewhere under a bridge. Get over yourself. |
I love you -- Gen X on a fixed income |
I think the delayed gratification may be the biggest issue more than anything else. How many Boomers and older GenX lived in tiny, unrenovated homes for YEARS before any renovations or upgrades were made. Every house that turns over in our neighborhood is bought for a super high price by millenials who then essentially also have the cash to gut and renovate immediately. There was also a recent post about how Millenials travel extensively more than prior generations. How many Boomers took their kids on luxury vacations every year or every school break. Many people with young families seem to want to live the same lifestyles their parents currently live. |
| The premise is dumb. Of course housing costs are lower because boomers are older and many have paid off their mortgages. When they were in their 30’s they had big mortgages (helped by much higher interest rates than today). |
Then vote for the people who will improve the economy. |
And the Boomers who live there who were upper income and corporate may also have real pensions of the type that ended in the 1990s. |
Boomers and elder Gen ZX had a much lower income-home price ratio throughout their child raising and home buying years than pretty much any other generation: https://www.longtermtrends.net/home-price-median-annual-income-ratio/ Mortgage payment to household income ratio is at historic highs: https://twitter.com/Barchart/status/1618079832730132482 Look, it was easier for Boomers - especially white Boomers - to get rich and acquire assets. There’s no shame in admitting that. Even during the Volcker years - the high interest rates still didn’t outweigh the low principal balances for homes back then relative to today. |
My mom hassled me for years to step up from my new 3 BR "starter" TH to a 4 BR SFH. Never did. First kid going to college this fall. I don't have to downsize now plus I avoided 20 years of lawnwork and major home repair. Win! |
No, I think it's that the housing market has fundamentally changed! I'm a millennial who moved around a lot for work and grad school in my 20s, so we weren't settled enough to buy until 2020 (believed the conventional wisdom that you shouldn't buy unless you expect to stay put for 5-10 years). We bought an unrenovated, tiny, old rowhome as a "starter house," planning to eventually move up to something bigger with a yard. That strategy isn't going to work anymore. We were looking at a $1000/month difference in payments between the smaller house and single family homes back in 2020. That difference has *at least* tripled. The attached "starter homes" haven't appreciated at the rates of SFHs either, so equity doesn't help much. What has happened to prices and rates in the last 3 years has made the idea of starting small and moving up unrealistic for a lot of us (we are not in fields where you can quadruple your salary from your 30s to 40s - most aren't). Yeah, I absolutely wish I hadn't bought into the "start small and move up" narrative you're pushing. |
| I was in Texas recently. Lots of new construction homes being built. |
Of course you have the opportunity, you’re just not willing to sacrifice the way boomers did. |
I really don't get the criticism here. So people who are retired or are nearing retirement don't want to (i) lose a lot of money in taxes, or (ii) increase their housing costs. And this is somehow . . . bad? They should be doing something different? Seems responsible to me. Can you explain how they are doing something wrong? |
+3 OP, you will never understand, because it will never be enough for you. People age out of their houses, and in most cases, leave it to their children, or their children move in with them, or some variation thereof. My friends all started in group houses, then tiny condos, then maybe a small townhouse, then maybe a small house - all of which took decades. No one gave them anything. Their parents had to both work (full time, and sometimes more than one job each, so not even teacher schedules) and buy what they could. The people in my neighborhood building $4m new builds are in their 30's, some have kids and some do not. Why don't you go after the latter for creating bidding wars, buying up all the land, and building the expensive houses? Besides, any "used" houses, or houses probably not good enough for you anyway, are scooped up by builders off market, for cash. So you are obviously not doing that part right, either. Did it occur to you to move further out, and suck it up, and commute for a bit? Or buy a smaller or less expensive home, without renovations (quel horreur!). What kind of sacrifices have you been making? Did you even pay for your own college? Talk to us when you know what the word "sacrifice" means. I am wondering if these posts are the same troll, because a grown arse adult could not possibly this naive, entitled and spoiled. |
The irony of red states generally having less restrictive zoning. https://www.newsweek.com/blue-states-housing-market-crisis-1877226 |