DP. I don’t object to the topics. I object to the fact that the topics are taught in a superficial and often biased manner where the lesson is basically “this is unjust!!” end of story. For example lots of lessons on “gentrification” but zero discussion on things like research on what increases housing costs, comparing cities like Tokyo to DC, etc. Just “gentrification is bad.” |
| I was a history major, and I have to say that a lot of people on here are misremembering when they themselves learned different elements of history. I’m pretty sure I would not have had a good mental timeline of all the things the OP mentioned when I was in middle school. Kids can’t even really conceptualize history until around 5th grade. Before that they think of everything as either old or new, which is why they often ask their teachers if they were around during the Civil War. |
What does that entail? |
Maybe. But I feel like 6th grade is old enough to be assigned a significant research & writing project, and that does not appear to be planned. |
What is CRM? |
We all know that Deal is the only functioning middle school in DCPS, so it's not really representative of the rest of DCPS as all. Of course DCUM wouldn't know this because all of DCUM resides within the Deal boundary. |
The schools are supposed to teach to the same standards, linked above. |
+1. I only seriously began learning US History when I took AP US History in 9th grade. |
If you've sent your kids to DCPS, you know this is not the reality. |
Reading out loud in class is a good way to figure out who doesn't know how to read. There are many who don't know how to read in 9th grade in DCPS. |
My kid doesn't go to Deal and is in 8th Grade in a regular DCPS middle school. Knows a lot, and a great deal about history, international affairs, and most of what the kid learned came from middle school. Likely knows plenty more than Deal-attending neighbors the same age, who couldn't give a shit and play video games all day and night. You're real quick to overly generalize. Try harder. Thanks. |
Or a better kid. The DCPS curriculum is standard across the city. My kids know different things even at the same ages. One is more interested in biology; another more interest in chemical science. I expose them; the school exposes them. Neither is a failure of the curriculum. |
It also helps with auditory and public speaking skills. Lots of well read people out there who can't pronounce words properly because they never heard the word read properly. Helps making sure kids are paying attention; helps kids overcome stage fright or any fear of public speaking. Nothing is a total panacea. |
Not in depth. |
|
This isn't just DC - it's a huge problem in the US. Building background knowledge is a part of the current science of reading push. Check out "The Knowledge Gap" by Natalie Wexler.
"THE KNOWLEDGE GAP focuses on a long-overlooked issue lying at the heart of what is known as the achievement gap: the failure of most elementary schools, and especially those serving low-income children, to systematically build knowledge of the world. Every school day, elementary teachers spend hours drilling students on comprehension skills and strategies like “finding the main idea” or “making inferences,” in an effort to boost their reading ability–and their scores on standardized reading tests. Subjects like history, science, and art have virtually disappeared from the curriculum in many schools. In fact, these schools are doing the exact opposite of what can actually turn students into good readers..." https://nataliewexler.com/the-knowledge-gap/ |