Prostitution ring broken up in Tysons/Fairfax. Politicians involved

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I really hope (rather, expect) the list of Johns include people involved in the mailer about Susanna Gibson.

That would be the type of person, for sure.
Anonymous
99% chance the women are trafficked against their will. That’s the real issue. Meh if it’s consensual but odds are it’s not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is why women should govern. Sure many aren't perfect but as a species, they are SO much better than men.


Read Carol Leonnig’s book about the Secret Service.

It shows what happens when men are allowed to operate in the shadows. Talk about an organization that needs a female head!


It's bizarre to me that people think putting women in charge will somehow change human nature. Women are people too and while they may be less likely to be abusers, they are no better at rooting out abusers than men are.

Also, women make up the majority of users on dcum yet everyone assumes that posters on this forum are male. Happened to a pp once and has happened to me repeatedly as well where someone explains I think xyz because I'm a man (I'm not). That alone tells you that there's a certain misogyny to people's belief that women leaders, being the fairer sex, would concern themselves all day with promoting kindness and love. Newsflash: we don't.
Anonymous
Lordy, I hope there are tapes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is why women should govern. Sure many aren't perfect but as a species, they are SO much better than men.


Read Carol Leonnig’s book about the Secret Service.

It shows what happens when men are allowed to operate in the shadows. Talk about an organization that needs a female head!


It's bizarre to me that people think putting women in charge will somehow change human nature. Women are people too and while they may be less likely to be abusers, they are no better at rooting out abusers than men are.

Also, women make up the majority of users on dcum yet everyone assumes that posters on this forum are male. Happened to a pp once and has happened to me repeatedly as well where someone explains I think xyz because I'm a man (I'm not). That alone tells you that there's a certain misogyny to people's belief that women leaders, being the fairer sex, would concern themselves all day with promoting kindness and love. Newsflash: we don't.

I don’t think anyone said women would concern themselves all day with kindness and love, but businesses with women at the helm do better. https://www.forbes.com/sites/karadennison/2022/12/15/businesses-succeed-with-women-in-leadership-its-time-to-make-the-workplace-more-equitable-for-women/#:~:text=60.2%25%20of%20gender%20diverse%20companies,54.1%25%20report%20enhanced%20company%20reputation Women leading governments tend to do better at that, too https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1127081

But women would do better here in part because the old boys club protects itself at all costs, even when there’s a festering undercurrent of misogyny that drives the culture of the organization.

Also I hope all these men who are guilty get named and shamed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:99% chance the women are trafficked against their will. That’s the real issue. Meh if it’s consensual but odds are it’s not.

You must be a Republican with that lack of care about national security.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:99% chance the women are trafficked against their will. That’s the real issue. Meh if it’s consensual but odds are it’s not.


Looking at the photos of these girls, and I emphasize girls, they don't look old enough to have consensual sex. MI
Anonymous
It's amazing to me that any man, much more one in any position of authority, would be stupid enough to list his employer and pay for sex with trafficked women on a credit card. But here we are!

Why did these guys need employers names if they weren't using these women as honeytraps?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:99% chance the women are trafficked against their will. That’s the real issue. Meh if it’s consensual but odds are it’s not.

You must be a Republican with that lack of care about national security.


Funny. I thought pp was a typical liberal - more worried about the possible trafficking of women than the implications this has for national security.
And, the dismissal of prostitution ("Meh").
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's amazing to me that any man, much more one in any position of authority, would be stupid enough to list his employer and pay for sex with trafficked women on a credit card. But here we are!

Why did these guys need employers names if they weren't using these women as honeytraps?


Right? It’s an almost comical red flag but these guys were so dumb and desperate, they didn’t notice. Name them and shame them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:99% chance the women are trafficked against their will. That’s the real issue. Meh if it’s consensual but odds are it’s not.


Looking at the photos of these girls, and I emphasize girls, they don't look old enough to have consensual sex. MI

They might not be. Or they might have been selected to look as young as possible. Either way, way too many men prefer women who look like girls (and girls).
Anonymous
Having read three different articles about this, can anyone else believe that in our year of the lord 2023 the way that the criminals who procure sex are referred to as “clients” and “customers.” When these women may have been coerced or trafficked. What the ever loving…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's amazing to me that any man, much more one in any position of authority, would be stupid enough to list his employer and pay for sex with trafficked women on a credit card. But here we are!

Why did these guys need employers names if they weren't using these women as honeytraps?

IKR? I stated up thread.. the prospect of having sex must've caused the blood from their big head to pool in their little head, thereby making them complete idiots.
Anonymous
Where are the names a la Ashley Madison?
Anonymous
they gave id, too, not just cc
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: