| My moms school closed a few years ago. It was a small Catholic woman’s college in a small NE towns that is now a very depressed little town. It was a great school when run by highly educated nuns but that population disappeared and the school just wasn’t attractive anymore. It had a lovely campus and a long history but could not make the transition. I have another friend whose mom’s school was similar. The closeups said more about trends from 50 years ago than trends from today — it was able to hang out so long because it has very loyal alumni from earlier decades but they have mostly died off by now. |
They should be targeting high achieving students. A number of 0 for whatever’s this year because they couldn’t believe they would not get into a top 20-30 school. Maybe a catchy phrase like America’s Safety School. |
CalTech is NOT an LAC; CalTech is a National University with a low number of students. Number of enrolled students does not define whether a school is an LAC or a National University. |
There are 3000+ 4 year schools in the US. When I said mediocre, say #200+ on USN&WR. International student's are not interested in small schools and bad locations Shit ton of schools are not in demand by international students and won't be saved by them. |
For example, #212 Bethel University has 58 international students. #212 is not even bad out of 3000+ |
That is not entirely correct. International students do go to less prestigious colleges. |
I found another interesting article on this subject. So if you graph demographic projections, the precipitous descent resembles a cliff beginning in 2025. Over the succeeding four years, the number of 18-year-olds will decrease by 15%. How does that translate into enrollment figures? During that four-year span, colleges will lose approximately 576,000 students. Unfortunately for higher education, this situation isn't an aberration. College enrollments have been declining steadily since 2012. During COVID-19's apex — from 2019 to 2022 — undergraduate enrollment dropped by 7%. Colleges in the Northeast and Midwest, regions that for years have been experiencing population declines due to migration patterns, will be hit hardest. Grawe's projections suggest both regions will see their college-going populations drop by more than 15% through 2029. That's sobering news for small, tuition-dependent private colleges in those states already teetering on shaky financial footing. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/analysis/looming-enrollment-cliff-poses-serious-threat-to-colleges/ |
Well it’s an evangelical Christian college whose motto is “guided by Christ “; I’m shocked it has 58. |
Do you think the hovering parents will accept their kid not going to college, or going to an online college? I don't think so. |
OK. Just trying to understand your post. Winging it from someone that claims to be in {academia}? You say you are from "academia" and you say it's "alarmist". You say you were "winging it" when you professed there are over 1,000 R-1 R-2 universities in the US? Yet there are less than 300 R-1 and R-2 universities in the US. Good lord, can you call yourself a teacher if you lie about basic facts? What exactly do you teach your kids in school? Are you a public, private teacher? |
| That a few tiny privates amongst 5,000 have chosen to close after covid or are consolidating (many on the list are doing that) is hardly the "more and more" you say to start this thread. A number of privates were already financially strained or had closed - like Sweet Briar - before Covid. Covid hit my college hard too, but it's pulling through. I've heard of one or two colleges on this list and they are consolidating. I think it should have closed or consolidated a long time ago. |
Just stop with the insults. She did admit that she was winging it. You, however, are being alarmist and misrepresenting the story. |
The "its hardly more and more" you say to start this reply comes directly from the CNBC article she was referencing. It' a direct quote from the articles headline. What exactly is your issue? |
Interesting article, but you misquoted it. It does not say the total number of 18-year-olds will decrease by 15%, but that this will happen in two regions of the US. In other areas the population will actually go up. As the NCES chart says, the total population will only go down by around 3% in the 3 years after the drop starts (not sure why they don't project beyond that--it would be useful). That's still not good for colleges, and those in the Northeast and Midwest will struggle mightily if they can't convince students from other areas of the country to attend, but it's not a demographic cliff for the whole country--more of a demographic shift. |
|
Fascinating how the regions hardest hit by this demographic change are the regions where people are most likely to believe that the best students go to the “best” (i.e., most expensive) colleges. Almost as if a generation of debt-laden college students were told not to have children they couldn’t afford, and didn’t.
Whereas in California, Texas, Florida, and the states that surround and connect them, a bright student from any background can get an excellent and affordable education at a state school. It’s almost as if expensive, status-driven, privatized education imposes a significant if slow-moving economic drag on a region. And affordable public education is the key to long-term economic growth. |