Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does ATS perform so much better than the other option schools and many neighborhood schools? Perhaps APS should look to expand whatever they’re doing there elsewhere?
Compared with neighborhood schools, option schools tend to have more parents who are highly motivated/with the capacity to be involved with their students' education. Involved parents = better performing students. A larger number of involved parents = a larger number of high performing students.
Beyond that, I can't confidently say why ATS scores better than other option schools. The program they describe sounds pretty generic IMO. Not bad, I just never got clarity on what they did that was so different from neighborhood schools. We're at an option school with a surprisingly high (to some parents I've talked to) free and reduced lunch rate. Lower income families absolutely care about their kids, but don't always have as much capacity to be involved. I know this from personal experience as one of the lower income kids at the schools I grew up in.
Maybe ATS has a lower free and reduced lunch rate?
http://schoolquality.virginia.gov/schools/arlington-traditional
Arlington Traditional School has an economically disadvantaged rate of 37% and Title I Status begins at 40%
Maybe PP can clarify what they mean by "perform so much better." Looking at English Academic Achievement on the school quality website linked above I found Alice Fleet (96%), Jamestown (94%), Discovery (96%), Abingdon (90%), ATS (98%), Campbell (96%), Claremont (96%), Key (97%). Those are all pretty high scores in that one metric. Barcroft (96%), Barrett (95%), Carling Springs (87%), Randolph (96%), and Drew (87%) all have free and reduced lunch rates over 70%. Perhaps the better question is what are Barcroft, Barrett, and Randolph doing that works so well which other schools should replicate.