NP HERE. I think you are wrong to assume that they are not high performing kids. I have two children who have already graduated from smacs at poolesville, so I don’t have any skin in this game. There were a few teachers that were good, many that were Ok, and several teachers that were just plain bad (bad teaching styles, didn’t respond to emails or students that asked for help, were waiting for retirement and already checked out). My children liked their fellow classmates and the bond they shared. Many times when the teachers wouldn’t teach, fellow students would teach each other. That’s what made the program, the camaraderie between the students. The school has a good reputation bc it’s a majority magnet school and bc magnet students will do good wherever they go. Teachers play a small part in that (some teachers none at all). |
10th grade has been fine for my DC too, except for AP Physics, which has been more work than all the other classes put together. It seems to be a teacher issue. |
Agree in general but somehow my kid still ends up doing 70-80% of the work on the group projects designed for five kids. Wish teachers would develop a better system of individual accountability for those. Love collaborative projects in theory but in practice someone always seems to draw the short stick and ends up with a much heavier workload as a result. Peer review can be great, but again tends to depend on luck of the draw. |
I am the PP here and I agree that peer review sucks. But the peer review at RMIB has been much better than what my kid was experiencing in her mixed-ability English class at our nonW middle school. It was actually pretty terrible and useless. At least at RMIB, the kids do offer some useful feedback. Also agree about the group projects. Sometimes groups are better than others. |