Yep, admitted to two Top 10 schools and then 2 other Top 20 schools. Part of the strategy was selecting schools that tend to value. Kid had high GPA and SAT, but we didn’t think that was enough alone. So we decided to present her as a kid who does 2 things well (one is pretty unusual, so it’d identify her if I said it—but these 2 things are def NOT national awards!). And then her essays and teacher recs and Common App activities all today variations on that theme. The schools are ones tha value quirky kids. It’s really about getting in the mind of the incredibly slammed Admissions Officers and giving them a clear and concise story about your kid as an individual. You have to give them something to finish the sentence “Oh that’s that kid who …..” I didn’t invent this of course, but a neighbor’s sister is an Adm Officer for an Ivy and was in town last summer. She chatted with us for 30 min and that completely changed our thinking. (Kid didn’t apply to that Ivy). |
Thanks again! Appreciate your comments. to me, the hard (maybe impossible) part is figuring out which schools have the institutional priorities which match what the kid has to offer. |
500k subscribers on YouTube is a lot for a high school kid. That’s a lot of money. The same with 200k on TikTok. It shows leadership and entrepreneurship, and that’s what ivies are looking for. There are more kids with 1600 SAT and perfect GPA than there are kids with 500k subscribers on YouTube or TikTok. |
Yeah lightening can hit the same spot twice. Unusual things happen. |
Another humble brag thread? Give it a rest. |
Definitely hard! Some of it is unknowable, but other priorities have data. Data will tell you whether ED and EA applicants are preferred and by how much, whether boy humanities majors are needed, whether they have a new program funded by a rich donor that they need to fill. If these sorts of things overlap with your kid’s circle, that’s a good match. Sure some of it is luck, but you’d be amazed how much is within your sphere of influence once you start looking. |
Higher percentage of the class. Not higher stats. Equal resumes from Langley and Wakefield- Wakefield kid gets a boost. Colleges like to think they’ve lifted someone from poverty even if it’s not true. So the most privileged kids in a less privileged zip code benefit. It’s messed up but that’s the way it is. |
This doesn't make sense to me. My kid goes to a school whose demographic is somewhat economically disadvantaged and almost everyone is black or Latino. Colleges can see my level of education, job, race, income.... So why would my kid benefit? |
But unless he’s an acting or marketing major, such sad commentary on the school’s values. So much dumb garbage on TikTok. Most parents don’t even want their kids on the app but a kid who gets followers is rewarded. Is he raising money for a good cause? Teaching something valuable? I hope so. |
Apparently Ivies think he brought good qualities to the table so they accepted him over someone with a perfect SAT and GPA. Regarding your comment "such sad commentary on the school’s values", well this is a free country and you don't have to attend Ivies if it does not fit your values. I am sure Ivy league schools would be glad to welcome Kylie Jenner should she decide to attend college. The school(s) will definitely take her over someone with perfect SAT and GPA. |
I agree it's getting old. Every kid and their cat has started a business, kept it going for two minutes, and used it to get into college. Either that, or they wrote a book that they then try to sell to classmates. Ugh. |
Well they probably think about it like... a kid who can accomplish this, has the skills and abilities to accomplish other things that will have societal impact... And it probably won't be tiktok and social media in 15 years. It's not like the kids' stats are terrible. And yeah, maybe they will make YouTubes about the school and raise the school's profile. That's probably part of it too. It's a business at the end of the day. |
|
Steven Pinker wrote about the "murky bottleneck" of undergraduate admission to Harvard in 2014. He addresses the issue of why the YouTuber-type kids are picked over academically gifted applicants. I suspect this is true at other comparable schools (besides MIT). Unsurprisingly, he is not a fan of the process:
"At the admissions end, it’s common knowledge that Harvard selects at most 10 percent (some say 5 percent) of its students on the basis of academic merit. At an orientation session for new faculty, we were told that Harvard “wants to train the future leaders of the world, not the future academics of the world,” and that “We want to read about our student in Newsweek 20 years hence” (prompting the woman next to me to mutter, “Like the Unabomber”). The rest are selected “holistically,” based also on participation in athletics, the arts, charity, activism, travel, and, we inferred (Not in front of the children!), race, donations, and legacy status (since anything can be hidden behind the holistic fig leaf)." Source: https://newrepublic.com/article/119321/harvard-ivy-league-should-judge-students-standardized-tests |
|
What an attacking tone most have taken with this poster.
I can only assume that they are angry, because he claims to have figured something out that they could not. Give jealousy a rest. |
You’re right and I don’t think I’m alone when I say I don’t think as much of the Ivies as I used to. Kylie was born into money, tripped into fame, bought herself a new face, used connections to become more famous then turned everything she did into a marketing machine with the help of all the best teams money can buy. Entirely unimpressive and nothing intellectual or world-changing. |