Let's examine that. Sentence 1 correctly recites the rule -- must be in writing if 1+ year. Sentence 2 identifies the text exchange as a writing and posits that such a writing is likely enforceable. Sentence 3 accurately states that an exchange of mutual promises is consideration. That is a solid B response and is helpful (although there's work to be done on receipt of facts as to whether the text is sufficient and the response fails to note the likely difficulty in achieving specific performance). |