St Stephen and the Incarnation welcomes atheists and skeptics too— Frank Dunn is a great. |
Adams wasn’t an atheist. He did interpret miracles and various theological points like the resurrection as metaphors. So you could say he was pretty far outside traditional theology, but that didn’t make him an atheist. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/a-local-life-james-r-adams-77-episcopal-priest-with-an-innovative-touch/2011/09/20/gIQAypk5tK_story.html |
Adams retired in 1996. How odd to keep posting about him under the guise of being “helpful” to OP. Here’s a direct quote from Adams: “Once they discover that religious language is primarily figurative by nature, the experience of faith can open up for them.” He wasn’t talking about faith in the great pumpkin. The rest of the quote is clear he wanted to help people find faith in Jesus and God. He wasn’t an atheist. |
Haven't checked back on the thread, but pretty sure Adams was not called an atheist. He called himself an agnostic and openly did not believe in God. Lots of current parishioners are non-believers, as is the case at other liberal protestant churches where there are no altar calls and not push to believe |
| Why do people who don’t believe in God attend church? |
Machar and Beth Chai, in Bethesda, are both humanist Jewish congregations. They are great choices for Jewish atheists. But they do expect you to have some sort of connection to Judaism and practice Jewish life cycle events and holidays. This is in contrast to something like WES, which isn't connected to any religion. |
You’re going to have to document these claims about Adams and “lots” of current parishioners not believing in God. The quote from Adams above, about helping non-believers “open up to faith” when he tells them much in the Bible was metaphor, would appear to contradict you. Also, it’s unlikely you’re a current member of that church, so the stuff about people coming up to you at coffee hour to confess their atheism doesn’t ring true. |
People here often express opinions and relate experiences that are not subject to documentation the way facts are. Readers can accept or reject such things as they like |
You can’t always get what you want, but if you try sometimes… |
So you can’t document your thoughts. Got it. |
So pp expects documentation of a person's thoughts. got it. |
So you expect us to take your “thoughts” as truths. Got it. Above there’s a link to a WaPo article showing that Adams was a believer and that he helped bring others in his parish to faith with his interpretation of the Bible. You’ve got your thoughts, though…. |
If you want us to accept your thoughts as fact, especially when your thoughts contradict the WaPo, then yes. |
| This question is so oxymoron. |
| A church by definition is a place of worship. What/who do you plan to worship OP? |