Josh “fist pump” Hawley

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

Yes, this. It’s a clear message of “I like hot guys who are nice!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

[Anonymous]

Yup, Josh, the anti-elitist with degrees from Stanford and Yale. Thank goodness he is saving us from Socialism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

Pointing out behaviors that would be common in a gay man is not homophobic. It is just pointing out the irony that hawley is a closeted gay man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yup, Josh, the anti-elitist with degrees from Stanford and Yale. Thank goodness he is saving us from Socialism.

Same with Vance, Cruz, Shapiro, etc. People eat it up.

[Anonymous]

Doesn’t Hawley live in NoVa?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

Pointing out behaviors that would be common in a gay man is not homophobic. It is just pointing out the irony that hawley is a closeted gay man.

+1
Calling Lindsay Graham “Lady G” is homophobic. Pointing out the closeted members of the GOP whose votes and the policies they support actively hurt the LGBTQ community isn’t homophobic.

And it doesn’t matter if he’s a closeted gay guy or not. He’s a treasonous wad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

Pointing out behaviors that would be common in a gay man is not homophobic. It is just pointing out the irony that hawley is a closeted gay man.

It is homophobic to mock anyone, even a closeted hypocritical GOP rep, with disrespectful language gays are targeted against. How hard it is to understand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

Pointing out behaviors that would be common in a gay man is not homophobic. It is just pointing out the irony that hawley is a closeted gay man.

It is homophobic to mock anyone, even a closeted hypocritical GOP rep, with disrespectful language gays are targeted against. How hard it is to understand?

How did Hawley get mocked, exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

Pointing out behaviors that would be common in a gay man is not homophobic. It is just pointing out the irony that hawley is a closeted gay man.

It is homophobic to mock anyone, even a closeted hypocritical GOP rep, with disrespectful language gays are targeted against. How hard it is to understand?

Homophobic?

Um, hun, it was the gay community that started circulating the nickname Lady G for him in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Above his bed he hung a sepia-toned poster of a shirtless male model cradling a newborn; when asked by classmates, he said it reflected his fervent stance against abortion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/07/us/politics/josh-hawley.html

Whoa. This explains a lot. Also, he’s got great taste in men

I used to have that poster. I wonder what ever happened to it haha.

I knew SO MANY women with that poster. Sigh. It is a good one.

What was the message of the poster? Was it a pro life promotion? Nothing like warning college boys that you’re only in college to get a MRS degree.

Uh, did you see that poster? The message of the poster was “I like d!ck, especially if the guy attached to ithas a sweet sensitive side.” You could put a puppy in there instead of a baby—same basic message.

It's another matter that Josh is a dishonest, hypocrite who likes to funnel propaganda for power... but why would you be so disrespectful to the concept of people being gay? You are showing your homophobic side here.

Pointing out behaviors that would be common in a gay man is not homophobic. It is just pointing out the irony that hawley is a closeted gay man.

It is homophobic to mock anyone, even a closeted hypocritical GOP rep, with disrespectful language gays are targeted against. How hard it is to understand?

Homophobic?

Um, hun, it was the gay community that started circulating the nickname Lady G for him in the first place.

Oh hell yeah now it's open season. I'm going in deeper than Chris Rock!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yup, Josh, the anti-elitist with degrees from Stanford and Yale. Thank goodness he is saving us from Socialism.

Don't forget his $1.3 million house in Vienna, VA. Only a man of the people would live in such a shack. With his wife with her Yale law degree and job at a prestigious DC law firm.

Puke. Such gross, grasping, nasty people. I feel bad for their kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, Josh, the anti-elitist with degrees from Stanford and Yale. Thank goodness he is saving us from Socialism.

Don't forget his $1.3 million house in Vienna, VA. Only a man of the people would live in such a shack. With his wife with her Yale law degree and job at a prestigious DC law firm.

Puke. Such gross, grasping, nasty people. I feel bad for their kids.

A Senator living in a 1.3 million house in Vienna doesn't sound extravagant. Hell my house is worth half that and im a GS-12 government worker with a family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, Josh, the anti-elitist with degrees from Stanford and Yale. Thank goodness he is saving us from Socialism.

Don't forget his $1.3 million house in Vienna, VA. Only a man of the people would live in such a shack. With his wife with her Yale law degree and job at a prestigious DC law firm.

Puke. Such gross, grasping, nasty people. I feel bad for their kids.

A Senator living in a 1.3 million house in Vienna doesn't sound extravagant. Hell my house is worth half that and im a GS-12 government worker with a family.

Half that. His home is worth twice what yours is worth. A 1.3 million dollar home is indeed extravagant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, Josh, the anti-elitist with degrees from Stanford and Yale. Thank goodness he is saving us from Socialism.

Don't forget his $1.3 million house in Vienna, VA. Only a man of the people would live in such a shack. With his wife with her Yale law degree and job at a prestigious DC law firm.

Puke. Such gross, grasping, nasty people. I feel bad for their kids.

A Senator living in a 1.3 million house in Vienna doesn't sound extravagant. Hell my house is worth half that and im a GS-12 government worker with a family.

A *Missouri* senator.