A regular voter's summary of wikileaks

[Anonymous]

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

This website is not owned by or affiliated with WikiLeaks. It was made entirely for free by an American citizen who is sick of government corruption and the lack of accountability and justice in our country. The goal of this website is to open the eyes of the American public to the corruption that is Hillary Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

This website is not owned by or affiliated with WikiLeaks. It was made entirely for free by an American citizen who is sick of government corruption and the lack of accountability and justice in our country. The goal of this website is to open the eyes of the American public to the corruption that is Hillary Clinton.

This sentence is at odds with your thread title. Regular voters are not Hillary hating nutjobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

This website is not owned by or affiliated with WikiLeaks. It was made entirely for free by an American citizen who is sick of government corruption and the lack of accountability and justice in our country. The goal of this website is to open the eyes of the American public to the corruption that is Hillary Clinton.

This sentence is at odds with your thread title. Regular voters are not Hillary hating nutjobs.

I don't think I"m a nut job, but I certainly hate Hillary. can't stand Trump either for that matter

regular voter since 1984

[Anonymous]

A regular voter's summary of wikileaks

You misspelled "deplorable shill."

[Anonymous]

Thanks OP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

[Anonymous]

Some scary stuff in there..not just corruption.

[Anonymous]

A summary can be found in this image:

https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/wikileakssummary1.jpg?w=697&h=829

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

And why is it you think we should just skip over Hillary and focus on the Republicans first?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

Bring it. I welcome bringing darkness into the light in every situation. I'll wait. Until then, I'll focus on what's here to be seen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

And why is it you think we should just skip over Hillary and focus on the Republicans first?

Because the Hillary stuff is fruit of the poisoned tree and we have Republican intransigence going on right now, for at least the last eight years. Why should we skip over that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

Nobody cares about corruption? Are we a banana republic already? It figures...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody cares, except Trump supporters.

In other words, "I do not give a damn about corruption and you cannot make me. It suits my needs not to care."

You sound proud of that stance. Vote for her, sure, but for God's sake, how can you not care about the deteriorated state our country is in that is allowing people to proudly state that they do not care about unethical behavior of its politicians?

Jesus, because you nutters don't care! These leaks come from Russia, and several of you on different threads here have said you don't care, we need to see the corruption! Well, then let's get started on the Republicans, who, may I remind you, have spent the last eight years doing NOTHING and have vowed to do more of the same. That's corruption you can weed out in your own party with a vote - no foreign influence needed! - but will you do it? Of course not. Cowards.

And why is it you think we should just skip over Hillary and focus on the Republicans first?

Because the Hillary stuff is fruit of the poisoned tree and we have Republican intransigence going on right now, for at least the last eight years. Why should we skip over that?

Hillary's running for the highest office in the land. To me, that makes investigating her corruption more important than the Republicans who have "done nothing over the last 8 years."

Has anyone come out and disauthenticated the e-mails? No? So, if we don't have reason to believe they've been modified, why should we focus on the source rather than the content? Has conclusive evidence come out that these leaks are from illegal hacking by the Russians? Nope, just "well this kinda looks like what they do so it might be them."

If a career criminal had evidence of a crime, should that evidence be ignored and not followed up on because of the source? You might look at the evidence a little more carefully due to the source, but it shouldn't be flat out ignored.