Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

I did lose a lot of respect for him after airing out their dirty laundry like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey team, it's the guy that works for iHeart again. I actually have no problem saying Roses is fake. 100%. That doesn't mean they aren't entertaining, but the whole benchmark is recorded by voice actors and syndicated to morning shows across the country.

As a former intern for the show I can also confirm that roses is fake. Voice actors, but I agree with that it doesn't mean it's less entertaining. We all know reality television is fake but millions of people watch it.

Where's your proof that it's fake? I could also say I work for the show and that it is real. Just reading a post somewhere doesn't mean it's true so I refuse to believe it's fake until I see some proof.

Its obvious it's fake...quite a few times they used to same actors to do WOTR using the same or different names and different scenarios. This was early on. I called Kane out on it and never heard back

I switched to STM because John and Dani didn't do it for me. I always had felt there was more behind Sarah leaving and really didn't like how the Mel situation was handled.

While STM may be a bit more boring, its like that peppy news program you have on your TV, perfect for background noise that entertains you enough when you need

[Anonymous]

Sarah Fraser just posted on her blog her response to the whole situation.

[Anonymous]

http://heyfrase.com/blog/2015/7/26/i-want-to-clarify-a-recent-post-i-made-on-social-media

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Fraser just posted on her blog her response to the whole situation.

Yeah, just seems like she's doing damage control now.

It's just sometimes very unfortunate that social media is such a huge part of society now. No thoughts or words are private anymore- especially when in a spotlight of any sort. It makes a lot of messy situations worse when you type things out in an emotional state, and those thoughts don't go away afterwards.

[Anonymous]

Let's be honest, though. It's one thing to leave your spouse. And she may have had her reasons for doing so.

But, assuming what he said was true..It's a whole nother ballgame to methodically steal from your spouse, hide it, let your bills lapse, and lie to their face about it (and if I'm remembering correctly, the whole SAG dues thing cost them their insurance coverage for a short while -- so assuming she did let that lapse as well, she hurt herself, her husband, and her children by denying them health coverage, if only for a short while). And then to jovially eat pizza when your spouse is gone, and systematically go through the house removing every shred of evidence that you even had a family with this person, and steal all family photos (harddrives and she fucking took pictures out of the frames? Who the fuck does that?), his passport (wtf does she even need that for???), all of their money, all of their valuables, the children, AND the pets...That's some fucked up psychological warfare shit. She was basically saying, "Look, I have the power to ruin you and take everything..and I will." And then to not only drain all the money, but further assert her power over him by denying him the ability to let his children see THEIR SICK DYING GRANDMOTHER??

There is literally no other reason to act in that manner than to inflict as much pain and hurt on him as humanly possible by stripping all memories of their life and children, and taking everything he worked for to provide them with. That is callous, heartless motivation. That is not the actions of someone who feared for herself and her children, that is the actions of someone who was spiteful, ateful, and resentful. It is not okay, no matter what your reasons are. And then to say you took the high road? No, you stole everything and set a horrible example for your children. When they are grown and understand what you did to their father, they will resent you and hate you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest, though. It's one thing to leave your spouse. And she may have had her reasons for doing so.

But, assuming what he said was true..It's a whole nother ballgame to methodically steal from your spouse, hide it, let your bills lapse, and lie to their face about it (and if I'm remembering correctly, the whole SAG dues thing cost them their insurance coverage for a short while -- so assuming she did let that lapse as well, she hurt herself, her husband, and her children by denying them health coverage, if only for a short while). And then to jovially eat pizza when your spouse is gone, and systematically go through the house removing every shred of evidence that you even had a family with this person, and steal all family photos (harddrives and she fucking took pictures out of the frames? Who the fuck does that?), his passport (wtf does she even need that for???), all of their money, all of their valuables, the children, AND the pets...That's some fucked up psychological warfare shit. She was basically saying, "Look, I have the power to ruin you and take everything..and I will." And then to not only drain all the money, but further assert her power over him by denying him the ability to let his children see THEIR SICK DYING GRANDMOTHER??

There is literally no other reason to act in that manner than to inflict as much pain and hurt on him as humanly possible by stripping all memories of their life and children, and taking everything he worked for to provide them with. That is callous, heartless motivation. That is not the actions of someone who feared for herself and her children, that is the actions of someone who was spiteful, ateful, and resentful. It is not okay, no matter what your reasons are. And then to say you took the high road? No, you stole everything and set a horrible example for your children. When they are grown and understand what you did to their father, they will resent you and hate you.

i hadn't heard that (didn't hear his speech on the radio) but i agree, that is more than "i'm scared and leaving" ... it's totally psychotic and resentful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest, though. It's one thing to leave your spouse. And she may have had her reasons for doing so.

But, assuming what he said was true..It's a whole nother ballgame to methodically steal from your spouse, hide it, let your bills lapse, and lie to their face about it (and if I'm remembering correctly, the whole SAG dues thing cost them their insurance coverage for a short while -- so assuming she did let that lapse as well, she hurt herself, her husband, and her children by denying them health coverage, if only for a short while). And then to jovially eat pizza when your spouse is gone, and systematically go through the house removing every shred of evidence that you even had a family with this person, and steal all family photos (harddrives and she fucking took pictures out of the frames? Who the fuck does that?), his passport (wtf does she even need that for???), all of their money, all of their valuables, the children, AND the pets...That's some fucked up psychological warfare shit. She was basically saying, "Look, I have the power to ruin you and take everything..and I will." And then to not only drain all the money, but further assert her power over him by denying him the ability to let his children see THEIR SICK DYING GRANDMOTHER??

There is literally no other reason to act in that manner than to inflict as much pain and hurt on him as humanly possible by stripping all memories of their life and children, and taking everything he worked for to provide them with. That is callous, heartless motivation. That is not the actions of someone who feared for herself and her children, that is the actions of someone who was spiteful, ateful, and resentful. It is not okay, no matter what your reasons are. And then to say you took the high road? No, you stole everything and set a horrible example for your children. When they are grown and understand what you did to their father, they will resent you and hate you.

...unless she had a reason to be THAT upset and do something SO drastic, right?

We don't know what happened. Period. But rational grown ups don't behave this way, right? They both seem a bit immature and off to me.

And I wonder if this is just how they roll. Some couples fight passionately and love passionately. Maybe this is just their crazy love dance? Who knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest, though. It's one thing to leave your spouse. And she may have had her reasons for doing so.

But, assuming what he said was true..It's a whole nother ballgame to methodically steal from your spouse, hide it, let your bills lapse, and lie to their face about it (and if I'm remembering correctly, the whole SAG dues thing cost them their insurance coverage for a short while -- so assuming she did let that lapse as well, she hurt herself, her husband, and her children by denying them health coverage, if only for a short while). And then to jovially eat pizza when your spouse is gone, and systematically go through the house removing every shred of evidence that you even had a family with this person, and steal all family photos (harddrives and she fucking took pictures out of the frames? Who the fuck does that?), his passport (wtf does she even need that for???), all of their money, all of their valuables, the children, AND the pets...That's some fucked up psychological warfare shit. She was basically saying, "Look, I have the power to ruin you and take everything..and I will." And then to not only drain all the money, but further assert her power over him by denying him the ability to let his children see THEIR SICK DYING GRANDMOTHER??

There is literally no other reason to act in that manner than to inflict as much pain and hurt on him as humanly possible by stripping all memories of their life and children, and taking everything he worked for to provide them with. That is callous, heartless motivation. That is not the actions of someone who feared for herself and her children, that is the actions of someone who was spiteful, ateful, and resentful. It is not okay, no matter what your reasons are. And then to say you took the high road? No, you stole everything and set a horrible example for your children. When they are grown and understand what you did to their father, they will resent you and hate you.

...unless she had a reason to be THAT upset and do something SO drastic, right?

We don't know what happened. Period. But rational grown ups don't behave this way, right? They both seem a bit immature and off to me.

And I wonder if this is just how they roll. Some couples fight passionately and love passionately. Maybe this is just their crazy love dance? Who knows.

ehh, imo any 35 year old woman who precipitately does that is off her rocker. no excuses in the world justifies planning and executing that behavior. not saying the same isn't true for P though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest, though. It's one thing to leave your spouse. And she may have had her reasons for doing so.

But, assuming what he said was true..It's a whole nother ballgame to methodically steal from your spouse, hide it, let your bills lapse, and lie to their face about it (and if I'm remembering correctly, the whole SAG dues thing cost them their insurance coverage for a short while -- so assuming she did let that lapse as well, she hurt herself, her husband, and her children by denying them health coverage, if only for a short while). And then to jovially eat pizza when your spouse is gone, and systematically go through the house removing every shred of evidence that you even had a family with this person, and steal all family photos (harddrives and she fucking took pictures out of the frames? Who the fuck does that?), his passport (wtf does she even need that for???), all of their money, all of their valuables, the children, AND the pets...That's some fucked up psychological warfare shit. She was basically saying, "Look, I have the power to ruin you and take everything..and I will." And then to not only drain all the money, but further assert her power over him by denying him the ability to let his children see THEIR SICK DYING GRANDMOTHER??

There is literally no other reason to act in that manner than to inflict as much pain and hurt on him as humanly possible by stripping all memories of their life and children, and taking everything he worked for to provide them with. That is callous, heartless motivation. That is not the actions of someone who feared for herself and her children, that is the actions of someone who was spiteful, ateful, and resentful. It is not okay, no matter what your reasons are. And then to say you took the high road? No, you stole everything and set a horrible example for your children. When they are grown and understand what you did to their father, they will resent you and hate you.

You don't take all that stuff and do those things if you are going on vacation, as she claimed. She obviously contacted a lawyer after she got to Florida who told her to get her ass back to Maryland because that is desertion/abandonment and he could get full custody because of what she did.

[Anonymous]

...unless he was controlling (OCD) and this was her best option?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:...unless he was controlling (OCD) and this was her best option?

But still, to literally do everything in secret and then take everything but the kitchen sink? She wanted to hurt him and leave him with nothing. She did just that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:...unless he was controlling (OCD) and this was her best option?

But still, to literally do everything in secret and then take everything but the kitchen sink? She wanted to hurt him and leave him with nothing. She did just that.

What else did she take? What did he see on security camera? I didn't hear the broadcast on Friday and trying to piece everything together. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

I have listened to the Kane Show on 99.5 since 2006 so I have heard the ups and downs of the show. I know no one on the show personally, but thought I would provide input on the way I see what happened last week.

I heard the entire audio from Friday when he revealed his impending divorce. While I think the segment did run on too long (I only think it was supposed to last about 15 minutes, but went about 35), I do believe it was honest and raw emotion that Kane showed. While I think it probably did honestly reveal a bit too much of the personal side of the issues between him and Natasha, at the end of the day I found myself wondering if he really had a choice.

For weeks, people have been commenting on nearly any social media post made by him, John, Danni, etc, asking where Natasha was. He had stopped talking about her right around the beginning of May, and I first noticed it when a random comment was made about Kane not being able to attend an event in Harrisburg at the end of May. I can't forget the exact comment that was made, but it was cryptic enough to draw my interest and think about to the last time he had discussed his wife as she was constantly a topic of discussion especially after they came back from Aruba in April and had been remarried there.

The constant badgering on social media about Natasha's whereabouts left him with little choice, but to eventually address this issue. Again, while he probably should have held a bit more inside and private, I think he truly wanted to get out his emotions and let listeners what was going on behind the scenes. Unfortunately, the way things are today, it is unlikely that he could have come on the radio and said that he and Natasha were divorcing and ask for privacy and that be the end of it.

Only a few days earlier right around 630am before they were heading to commercial he finally did answer a text someone had sent about why he was no longer talking about Natasha. Instead of fully addressing the situation though, he simply said that he does not constantly talk about his dogs either and that it was private. Again, this only led to more speculation. It is a sad fact that many people would have been relentless in questioning until the truth appeared or they would have simply made up their own stories to suit the situation.

Realize Sarah and Samy left the show 2-3 years ago each and questions are still asked constantly about why they left the show as no one seems to believe the reasons given at the time of departure. Mel's departure was addressed on the show so the questions about her are less frequently asked.

If he said they were getting divorced and asked for privacy with no further explanation, people would have quickly made their own conclusions as to infidelity, etc. It is just the world we live in right or wrong.

Instead, he started the conversation by clearing stating that no infidelity had occurred on either side, and instead provided what he says happened. As other posters have mentioned, I am sure there are the 3 sides to the story, but at least he got out his side so fully that hopefully answers questions and stops people from commenting constantly and asking about Natasha's whereabouts. Yes, there was a better way of probably doing it, but I think he simply got caught up in the emotion of the moment, and left every thing out at once.

All in all, I think this ultimately was the quickest way to possibly move on from the situation even if the initial firestorm is high.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://heyfrase.com/blog/2015/7/26/i-want-to-clarify-a-recent-post-i-made-on-social-media

I agree with the other PP who said she was just doing damage control. Notice how she didn't even address her snarky "I'm in fairy land like Kane!" (that was the gist) tweet, or the ones where she said we should support Nat.

I used to listen to the Hot Morning Mess, and Sarah always came off as really shallow and catty to me. *shrug*