Ahead by 15 points according to Jason Easley. I can't do links but here is website.
www.politicususa.com |
I saw this too but is this a respectable poll? I couldn't find anything on the major sites. |
Sounds too good to be true. But it will make for a happier afternoon, so I'll believe (until I hear otherwise ![]() |
I sure hope so. This guy cannot come anywhere close to the oval. |
Good. |
I hope this is true, but I'll wait for the RCP polling average before I start getting excited. You all should too. |
Clinton is up, albeit by less than a point, after being behind by about the same amount. |
The Reuters poll yesterday showed a 7 point bounce for Clinton. Also the latest poll from Missouri shows a tie where Romney won Missouri by ten points. So far, everything is pointing to a big bounce for Clinton. |
Yes! Especially your imagination! |
Up sharply in two polls is evidence. What do you have? |
Well the Democratic convention should give her a boost. It was much better than the Republican convention. |
I heard on the NPR politics podcast that whoever is in the lead in about three weeks is normally the person who will win. I don't believe any rules apply this year. But I hope it's her |
The Reuters poll was after a change in methodology. It is explained by Reuters on their website. In a matchup with the nominees for the Libertarian and Green parties, Reuters shows Trump and Clinton to be in a tie. |
FWIW, Raba Research who conducted the poll that OP referenced is rated B- by 538. |
They don't say what the actual impact was, but I am guessing the original wording benefited Clinton because two weeks ago she was doing about 6 points in Reuters than in any other poll. |