2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they keep losing, the roster may change by next weekend…

How did Cap Blue 28's do today? Have they already played?

O-fer…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If they keep losing, the roster may change by next weekend…

Not really an option for this year. Just need to keep hitting on other teams' moms and dads until next July if that's what they want. Bring up recruiting for other years. Yada. For the dozen MD defectors, explain the 40 minute ride is shorter than 50 minutes for practice. It's still early, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they keep losing, the roster may change by next weekend…

Not really an option for this year. Just need to keep hitting on other teams' moms and dads until next July if that's what they want. Bring up recruiting for other years. Yada. For the dozen MD defectors, explain the 40 minute ride is shorter than 50 minutes for practice. It's still early, though.

This would be really interesting if I could understand it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they keep losing, the roster may change by next weekend…

Not really an option for this year. Just need to keep hitting on other teams' moms and dads until next July if that's what they want. Bring up recruiting for other years. Yada. For the dozen MD defectors, explain the 40 minute ride is shorter than 50 minutes for practice. It's still early, though.

This would be really interesting if I could understand it.

I think it is meant to say moms should hit on the dads of other teams because that is what they want. Not sure who is “they”, but it’s probably both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they keep losing, the roster may change by next weekend…

Not really an option for this year. Just need to keep hitting on other teams' moms and dads until next July if that's what they want. Bring up recruiting for other years. Yada. For the dozen MD defectors, explain the 40 minute ride is shorter than 50 minutes for practice. It's still early, though.

This would be really interesting if I could understand it.

I think it is meant to say moms should hit on the dads of other teams because that is what they want. Not sure who is “they”, but it’s probably both.

27 Blue also went winless today (not in one of the top divisions either) so I don’t know that waiting is the answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they keep losing, the roster may change by next weekend…

Not really an option for this year. Just need to keep hitting on other teams' moms and dads until next July if that's what they want. Bring up recruiting for other years. Yada. For the dozen MD defectors, explain the 40 minute ride is shorter than 50 minutes for practice. It's still early, though.

This would be really interesting if I could understand it.

'28 might be short players. But nothing they can do about it until July. Hope that helps.

[Anonymous]

Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

I was replying to a sarcaatic post saying they'll be looking for changes inside a week. No need for a full autopsy on the point you're making. We're probably on the same side of the topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

I was replying to a sarcaatic post saying they'll be looking for changes inside a week. No need for a full autopsy on the point you're making. We're probably on the same side of the topic.

They will be fine. Faced some very tough competition today so not a totally unexpected outcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

I was replying to a sarcaatic post saying they'll be looking for changes inside a week. No need for a full autopsy on the point you're making. We're probably on the same side of the topic.

They will be fine. Faced some very tough competition today so not a totally unexpected outcome.

Decent chance. Results weren't terrible. Played top teams.
Posited a bit ago that "likely top 10" was a weird conclusion to make for a group that hadn't played yet, and I guess it was a boring take.

This weekend probably points to mid-teens+ or so, but it's small sample size. And early, every team out there has the opportunity to improve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

I was replying to a sarcaatic post saying they'll be looking for changes inside a week. No need for a full autopsy on the point you're making. We're probably on the same side of the topic.

They will be fine. Faced some very tough competition today so not a totally unexpected outcome.

Decent chance. Results weren't terrible. Played top teams.
Posited a bit ago that "likely top 10" was a weird conclusion to make for a group that hadn't played yet, and I guess it was a boring take.

This weekend probably points to mid-teens+ or so, but it's small sample size. And early, every team out there has the opportunity to improve.

Boring take indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

I was replying to a sarcaatic post saying they'll be looking for changes inside a week. No need for a full autopsy on the point you're making. We're probably on the same side of the topic.

They will be fine. Faced some very tough competition today so not a totally unexpected outcome.

Decent chance. Results weren't terrible. Played top teams.
Posited a bit ago that "likely top 10" was a weird conclusion to make for a group that hadn't played yet, and I guess it was a boring take.

This weekend probably points to mid-teens+ or so, but it's small sample size. And early, every team out there has the opportunity to improve.

If they don’t beat M&D Red tomorrow, probably outside of top 25 at best this fall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Short players? This is what they got. How many players are going to come in and make a difference.

I was replying to a sarcaatic post saying they'll be looking for changes inside a week. No need for a full autopsy on the point you're making. We're probably on the same side of the topic.

They will be fine. Faced some very tough competition today so not a totally unexpected outcome.

Decent chance. Results weren't terrible. Played top teams.
Posited a bit ago that "likely top 10" was a weird conclusion to make for a group that hadn't played yet, and I guess it was a boring take.

This weekend probably points to mid-teens+ or so, but it's small sample size. And early, every team out there has the opportunity to improve.

Boring take indeed.

Why Caps think they're gilded top 10 is pretty boring, but you don't hear me banging on that as often as possible.

[Anonymous]

I wonder if Data Guy is out there somewhere pondering whether to come out of retirement. The analysis here is too opinion driven and devoid of facts. Come back, DG.

[Anonymous]

Who would have thought that capital orange would be the star team of the 2028s.