Another ICE Shooting in Minnesota

[Anonymous]

I don’t know why ICE doesn’t wait to put out a statement. They knew the video was going to come out. The domestic terrorist line is absurd.

[Anonymous]

The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?

Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning

He's a lawfully registered gun owner. He never touched the gun during the incident and was shot after the gun was taken from him.

This. Never pulled his gun out, never a threat. Bad, sloppy and very dangerous police work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.

Nope. The guy who shot had clear eyes on the other one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.

Maybe if they didn’t have 7 people on him at the same time they would have been able to see he didn’t have a gun in his hand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?

Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning

He's a lawfully registered gun owner. He never touched the gun during the incident and was shot after the gun was taken from him.

WTF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why ICE doesn’t wait to put out a statement. They knew the video was going to come out. The domestic terrorist line is absurd.

You can see it in the comments in the first 10 minutes on this thread...get their adherents to buy into whatever they put out so they maintain that line despite any evidence that follows. Orwell warned us of this, or at least those of us who read his books.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.

If only there were audio to go along with video so anyone watching and listening can hear exactly what happened.



don't need an anonymous poster theorizing needlessly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.

Yay for you for rationalizing shooting a man in the back 6 times while six men held him down after beating him and pistol whipping him. And the gun he legally had on his person was in a holster so your theory makes no sense-he wasn’t wielding it. There is no simple explanation other than this was an execution and if you can’t see that shame on you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New video that shows the moments leading up to the shooting. I believe the person on the left of the screen in the first few seconds is the victim of the shooting.

Indefensible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tim Pool is a MAGA-aligned influencer and podcaster and a supporter of Donald Trump.

Wait, what does he mean "neither side cares any more what justifies it (the greater conflict) or doesn't?"

The side the supports the Constitution cares very much about what justifies this conflict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?

Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning

He's a lawfully registered gun owner. He never touched the gun during the incident and was shot after the gun was taken from him.

This. Never pulled his gun out, never a threat. Bad, sloppy and very dangerous police work.

ICE and CPB are not police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why ICE doesn’t wait to put out a statement. They knew the video was going to come out. The domestic terrorist line is absurd.

You can see it in the comments in the first 10 minutes on this thread...get their adherents to buy into whatever they put out so they maintain that line despite any evidence that follows. Orwell warned us of this, or at least those of us who read his books.

I mean, is there no point at which you start asking yourself, maga, if they just think you are stupid and they are pulling the wool over your eyes at every turn?

[Anonymous]

MN House Republican:

https://x.com/GOPMajorityWhip/status/2015129275293131229

[Anonymous]

This is who is governing us now