Epstein letter: Trump knew

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

More kids for them to traffic. Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?

You sound like a foreign troll.

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

Thank you. Now we know some of our trolls are ICE. Makes sense. F ICE.

Chinga la migra

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.

(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

Tender years is a legal designation for a child under 7. I'm a long-time investigator. Why is KKKaroline not raising her own child? She was in Alaska for his first birthday, Weird.

[Anonymous]

FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638

I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.

"Tender years" is a legal designation for a child under 7. Long before ICE. I'm a long-time investigator. Why is KKKaroline not raising her own child? She was in Alaska for his first birthday, Weird.

[Anonymous]

Thank you. Now we know some of our trolls are ICE. Makes sense. F ICE.

Chinga la migra

You are really, really stupid if you think ICE is on here criticizing KKKaroline and Trump.

F ICE though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We do not know whose name was redacted.

Republicans have stated that it was a victim who has stated that Mr. Trump did nothing inappropriate. This helps Mr. Trump if, in fact, that was the name which was redacted.

A real concern regarding the Epstein files is whether or not it contains allegations and details of money laundering for Russia. This concern was raised recently by a prominent Democrat strategist on a major cable news network a couple of days ago.

That’s far from the only real concern. Who knows what’s in there but there is obviously stuff in there that Trump is desperate to keep hidden.

To me, to strangest rumor going around (based on the emails) has to do with a possible sexual relationship between Trump and “bubba,” who people assume is exactly who you think it is.

There is allegedly an email between the brothers epstein where the one who wasn't a convicted pedo asks the other if "Putin has the photo of trump blowing bubba"

I don't believe it. The emails are now publicly available. You can post any of them here. Do so.

Searchable database:

https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/

It’s true.

The reference to the movie "Get Hard" can be taken two ways:

1. Trump did blow bubba
2. Trump did something illegal and might go to prison, referencing this movie about a white man turning to a black man to help him get ready to go to prison

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2561572/

"the photo" It seems beyond belief the donnie tee would blow anyone, much less bubba (charismatic as he was) but trump has done so much unbelievable sh it in public at his rallies, pressers and on twitter. I think he did blow bubba and there is a picture of it somewhere.

If Putin does have it, it would indeed go a long way to explaining why Trump does whatever Putin wants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:lol

I mean, asking Bill Clinton would also work.

[Anonymous]

"Newly released emails from the House Oversight Committee suggest that Jeffrey Epstein’s flights were deliberately coordinated around President Donald Trump’s movements during his first term—a startling revelation that raises more questions about the closeness of their ties."

https://dailyboulder.com/jeffrey-epsteins-flights-were-coordinated-with-trumps-schedule-multiple-times-during-first-term-new-emails-show/

[Anonymous]

My prediction for the Epstein files is that when released, they will once again vindicate Trump (just as the emails do, and all other evidence points to)

Dems will get rug-pulled once again and have a 72-hour meltdown where they go through the five stages of grief:

-Denial: misinformation zoneflood via paid influencers
-Anger: seething/sperging on the TL
-Bargaining: "Trump messed with them!" "Why didn't he just release them if he's innocent"
-Depression: deactivation or a 4-hour break
-Acceptance: they'll move on to calling him a fascist again or something

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My prediction for the Epstein files is that when released, they will once again vindicate Trump (just as the emails do, and all other evidence points to)

Dems will get rug-pulled once again and have a 72-hour meltdown where they go through the five stages of grief:

-Denial: misinformation zoneflood via paid influencers
-Anger: seething/sperging on the TL
-Bargaining: "Trump messed with them!" "Why didn't he just release them if he's innocent"
-Depression: deactivation or a 4-hour break
-Acceptance: they'll move on to calling him a fascist again or something

I have two questions for you: was January 6 the best day of your life? Or was it when you got the pardon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My prediction for the Epstein files is that when released, they will once again vindicate Trump (just as the emails do, and all other evidence points to)

Dems will get rug-pulled once again and have a 72-hour meltdown where they go through the five stages of grief:

-Denial: misinformation zoneflood via paid influencers
-Anger: seething/sperging on the TL
-Bargaining: "Trump messed with them!" "Why didn't he just release them if he's innocent"
-Depression: deactivation or a 4-hour break
-Acceptance: they'll move on to calling him a fascist again or something

You’re in a cult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My prediction for the Epstein files is that when released, they will once again vindicate Trump (just as the emails do, and all other evidence points to)

Dems will get rug-pulled once again and have a 72-hour meltdown where they go through the five stages of grief:

-Denial: misinformation zoneflood via paid influencers
-Anger: seething/sperging on the TL
-Bargaining: "Trump messed with them!" "Why didn't he just release them if he's innocent"
-Depression: deactivation or a 4-hour break
-Acceptance: they'll move on to calling him a fascist again or something

We're currently seeing Trump go through these five stages with respect to his pedophilia and close association with Epstein. Thank you for laying it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My prediction for the Epstein files is that when released, they will once again vindicate Trump (just as the emails do, and all other evidence points to)

Dems will get rug-pulled once again and have a 72-hour meltdown where they go through the five stages of grief:

-Denial: misinformation zoneflood via paid influencers
-Anger: seething/sperging on the TL
-Bargaining: "Trump messed with them!" "Why didn't he just release them if he's innocent"
-Depression: deactivation or a 4-hour break
-Acceptance: they'll move on to calling him a fascist again or something

Releasing the files is for the victims, who deserve justice.

It's Trump who is making it about himself.

[Anonymous]

Democrat Melanie Stansbury on CNN:“We’ve all seen the photographs of Donald Trump with underage girls sitting on his lap.”

I’m sorry what? Where are these pictures? Or are we just saying things now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrat Melanie Stansbury on CNN:“We’ve all seen the photographs of Donald Trump with underage girls sitting on his lap.”

I’m sorry what? Where are these pictures? Or are we just saying things now?

Apparently they're out there, and they've been mentioned for decades. But she's lying when she says we've all seen them.