jsteele
Site Admin
Joined: 11/12/2007 23:38
Messages: 49988
Offline
Let's hear what others have to say. My first reaction is to think that i wouldn't want to see an "I saw your computer geek" forum in which everyone posted each time they saw me screw up. That might be the busiest forum here
To the PP, "I saw your nanny" refers to reporting incidents in which nannies were spotted acting in an unacceptable manner such as mistreating their chargers or endangering them.
Obviously, parents who have hired nannies would generally welcome hearing if their nanny had endangered or otherwise mistreated their child. But, on the other hand, only one side of the story gets reported and such postings often result in tarnishing the reputations of all nannies. I think the reports also increase divisions between stay-at-home moms and work-out-of-the-house moms and the last thing we need is more animosity between those groups.
But, the bottom line is that we don't run this board only for posts that we want, but for those that the community wants. If there is widespread support for this idea, we can try it out.
|
DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
jsteele
Site Admin
Joined: 11/12/2007 23:38
Messages: 49988
Offline
We tried this idea and it didn't work out. I don't think we will be doing it again.
|
DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
jsteele
Site Admin
Joined: 11/12/2007 23:38
Messages: 49988
Offline
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that a picture of someone in a public place is legal. Otherwise, paparazzi would be getting sued left and right. I would allow such a picture to be posted. It is unlikely that I would get sued. Rather, someone would likely sue "John Doe' and subpoena me for evidence to track down the poster.
|
DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele