Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That liberal rag, The Wall Street Journal contacted several of the people quoted in the Post story, or people close to them:

- “I stand by the interview I gave the Washington Post"
- "I stand by my statement"
- “This happened, this is not fake news.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-senators-say-roy-moore-should-quit-alabama-race-if-sexual-misconduct-claims-are-true-1510258993

The Post reporter recently left that liberal rag, the WSJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.

Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "

Stop being obtuse. If they'd only reported he'd whipped out his dick for a 14 year to rub you'd have said prove it.

And you think it's okay for a 30 something to start propositioning a 16 year old and then
start dating her and giving her alcohol when she turned 18? I hope you don't have daughters.

[Anonymous]

If Moore does falsely deny the claim publicly, he gives his victim a distinct defamation claim that isn't time-barred.

How does this apply to the statement that his campaign released (from him)?

[Anonymous]

Mateus Rose. Pedophile approved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If Moore does falsely deny the claim publicly, he gives his victim a distinct defamation claim that isn't time-barred.

And if he truthfully denies it, she gives him one as well.

Good luck with that.

Given the nature of the allegation, and the time that's passed, they would both have trouble proving defamation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked, SHOCKED that someone who espouses moral superiority and judgement over the sovereignty of others, has sick skeletons in his closet.

Anthony Weiner, is that you? or is this Ted kennedy?

Well, no, because they don't/didn't the moral high ground and judge people like the party of "family values" does. So, not the same thing.

Also, nice try and deflection. Typical, you can't defend your party's guy so you attack others. Maybe instead of being on here, you should do some soul searching to reconcile your need to do that.

Not the PP, but spare us your sanctimony. No one is deflecting - we're simply pointing out what hypocrites you are for somehow putting your outrage on mute when it comes to Democrats and their own share of sex scandals. And please - Democrats claim the moral high ground every single day. Moron.

If by moral high ground you mean we don't think a man who brags about grabbing women's genitalia should become president then I plead guilty.

What about a man who receives blow jobs from an intern under his desk in the Oval Office?

I think that's skeevy too.

Your turn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's only the Republicans who rant on about the Ten Commandments and the scourge of homosexuality and the ills of liberal society, and go off and commit pedophilic acts.

At least the Dems who commit sex crimes aren't pretending to be paragons of holiness and rectitude.

Talk about a low bar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More to the point, his buddies in Alabama are on board:

“There’s nothing to see here,” said Jim Zeigler, the state auditor and a longtime supporter of Mr. Moore. “Single man, early 30s, never been married, dating teenage girls. Never been married and he liked younger girls. According to The Washington Post account he never had sexual intercourse with any of them.”

Deplorable Emeritus.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Zeigler

Just part of life in Alabama.

Didn’t their governor refuse to resign after his affair with an employee was exposed and confirmed true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Dems have been busted for pedophila? GOP has two recently, Hastert and Moore. I guess Weiner?

Joseph Morrissey, Jacob Schwartz, Ed Murray...

Who?

Ah, yes. Democratic denial. Google is your friend.

The only name I recognize is Ed Murray, and he resigned on his own volition.

Let's see if Roy Moore does the same, although I doubt he will as he still has the support of republicans who enable his pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What Dems have been busted for pedophila? GOP has two recently, Hastert and Moore. I guess Weiner?

Joseph Morrissey, Jacob Schwartz, Ed Murray...

Who?

Ah, yes. Democratic denial. Google is your friend.

Repeating from above, since apparently you don't understand this:

It's only the Republicans who rant on about the Ten Commandments and the scourge of homosexuality and the ills of liberal society, and go off and commit pedophilic acts.

At least the Dems who commit sex crimes aren't pretending to be paragons of holiness and rectitude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If Moore does falsely deny the claim publicly, he gives his victim a distinct defamation claim that isn't time-barred.

And if he truthfully denies it, she gives him one as well.

Good luck with that.

Given the nature of the allegation, and the time that's passed, they would both have trouble proving defamation.

He’s a public figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More to the point, his buddies in Alabama are on board:

“There’s nothing to see here,” said Jim Zeigler, the state auditor and a longtime supporter of Mr. Moore. “Single man, early 30s, never been married, dating teenage girls. Never been married and he liked younger girls. According to The Washington Post account he never had sexual intercourse with any of them.”

Deplorable Emeritus.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Zeigler

Just part of life in Alabama.

Didn’t their governor refuse to resign after his affair with an employee was exposed and confirmed true?

Correct. And their speaker of the state house was indicted on multiple counts of corruption and eventually served time.

[Anonymous]

Did Moore have the principles to molest the intixicated teenager on a giant replica of the 10 Commandments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If Moore does falsely deny the claim publicly, he gives his victim a distinct defamation claim that isn't time-barred.

And if he truthfully denies it, she gives him one as well.

Good luck with that.

Given the nature of the allegation, and the time that's passed, they would both have trouble proving defamation.

He’s a public figure.

That's correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked, SHOCKED that someone who espouses moral superiority and judgement over the sovereignty of others, has sick skeletons in his closet.

Anthony Weiner, is that you? or is this Ted kennedy?

Well, no, because they don't/didn't the moral high ground and judge people like the party of "family values" does. So, not the same thing.

Also, nice try and deflection. Typical, you can't defend your party's guy so you attack others. Maybe instead of being on here, you should do some soul searching to reconcile your need to do that.

Not the PP, but spare us your sanctimony. No one is deflecting - we're simply pointing out what hypocrites you are for somehow putting your outrage on mute when it comes to Democrats and their own share of sex scandals. And please - Democrats claim the moral high ground every single day. Moron.

If by moral high ground you mean we don't think a man who brags about grabbing women's genitalia should become president then I plead guilty.

What about a man who receives blow jobs from an intern under his desk in the Oval Office?

Are you familiar with the concept of “consent,” and the related concept of “age of consent.”

Sure. But you brought up "moral high ground" and stated you don't think Trump should be president because he grabbed women's genitalia. Clearly, those high moral standards of yours didn't keep you from making Bill Clinton president - twice.