OJ simpson Died

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you also know If I Did It was ghostwritten by Nicole’s neighbor Pablo Fenjes who testified for the prosecution? OJ was broke at the time and needed a shock value book to sell. It wasn’t even written by him. It was written completely by Nicole’s ex neighbor who wanted cash also

With very few exceptions, all celebrity books are ghostwritten. OJ told his story to Pablo Fenjes, who was a screenwriter and a frequent ghostwriter. Judith Regan and Pablo Fenjes both claim that OJ was interviewed extensively for the book. (Only OJ’s manager later said he wasn’t involved.)

Judith Regan lost her job at Harper Collins over it. That’s how egregious the whole project was. Why?

Because OJ details how he committed the crimes. There could have been a camera crew following him, taking him committing the murders, and you still wouldn’t believe it. You are hopeless, PP.

Oj never told this story . He was broke.

Ron’s family are also co-authors of this book. They make money from If I Did it as well.

All of the people in this case are scummy. The Brown family and Ojs kids are the only ones who act with class .

Simpson's former manager, Norman Pardo, claimed that Simpson was not involved in writing the book but rather accepted $600,000 to say he had written it and to conduct an interview

Ron’s family were not coauthors of the book. They were not remotely involved in this foul project. They were awarded all proceeds from the book to stop OJ from profiting from it.

You are beyond offensive and STUPID.

I never got the impression that the Goldmans tried to profit from their son Ron’s brutal murder.

Not at all.

I got the impression that they were just angry (rightfully so!) that this monster brutally stabbed their loved one to death in the most heinous manner and thanks to the dumbest. jury. ever. he got away with it.

And since Ron’s killer never had to be penalized for his obvious crime by serving hard time > the only other way to penalize him would be to take away his livelihood.

I bet if they could have had Ron alive they definitely would have considered that the ultimate “option” for lack of a better term.
No amount of $$ can ever replace the pain + grief that they have endured the past three decades for sure. 💔💔💔
I see no blood on their hands.
All I see is a grieving family who has suffered the most anguishing pain that any human being could suffer.
No dollar amount could ever erase that kind of pain.

So if they could make the monster who inflicted this horrendous pain suffer for what he did, even in small part it is worth it.

Unless you have ever been in their situation (thankfully you will not ~ God-willing,) then it is best to not say anything derogatory in their honor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Raging Heart dude, of course, Nicole was acting out, she was married to a narcissistic abuser who made her life a living hell and then ultimately killed her.

Who wouldn’t act out under the circumstances? See how put together you’d be in her shoes, much younger, much poorer, family ready to pump her out, no place to run, constant gaslighting and self-doubt. Most people would probably turn to drugs, too.

I wish I believed in hell. That is where that scumbag, wife beater belongs.

Drugs or no drugs, she was a piece of work when alive. Her own friends and family told all those bad stories in the book. The books premise was showing her scandalous side as if to say that’s why Oj was incensed enough to kill her.

It just is odd that OJ isn’t the one saying these bad things about her . It’s her so called friends

Let’s assume OJ was innocent (in your dreams), he beat the sh-t out of Nicole on multiple occasions. It’s documented. Who cares what he did or didn’t say about her? He abused her in every way possible.

The only piece of work is you, libeling an abused wife who has been dead for 30 years. You’re a disgusting piece of work.

Did she go to the hospital? He never beat the shit out of her. Nicole’s own parents told Marcia Clark she lied and exaggerated DV claims to try and get more spousal support. In the 1993 call, Nicole says OJ hadn’t hit her in 4 years since 1989 and it only happened one time. OJ also added to the settlement a clause that if he ever put his hand on Nicole again, he would pay her 5 million dollars. A stupid idea. That’s probably why she kept stalking his girlfriends and called 911 in 1993.

You really don’t know anything about domestic violence, do you?

Do you think she deserved to be beaten? Do you think it was ok that she made him so mad he killed her?

She hit him first. In her therapy notes and in the Divorce case (many components of which are also sealed), she talks about her temper as well.

Nobody knows who killed her. Everyone’s so sure Oj did it but you weren’t there and I wasn’t there either so you don’t know that he did it.

Circumstantial evidence isn’t compelling. Scott cheated on Laci. Oj hit Nicole.

So what? What’s the evidence on the actual scenes? Both victims got down and fought bravely and hard with their attacker for over 5-10 minutes. There should be a pot full of DNA evidence, hairs, blood, fingerprints all over their bodies.

OJ should’ve have blood on his eyelashes and all over his feet and hands after two stabbings of that magnitude . His Bronco having 1/8 of 1 drop of blood makes no sense. His white fixtures and wall to wall carpeting in his room and his sink and bathroom would be covered in blood. How would he kill people, not get mauled to death by the dog, clean up, get home without leaving a trace (except for a glove and sock) , get the Bronco cleaned , and get in the Limo to the airport in 20 minutes?

Is he Superman?

The reason that Nicole’s dog did not maul OJ is because it was not a pit bull (j/k) but because the dog knew OJ very well.

That’s bull. A dog would not their owner get attacked af all. The dog didn’t know OJ that well. They were divorced . The dog belonged to Nicole. At the very least, the dog would’ve done something while two fights and confrontations went on. I can’t get enough of this case if got can’t tell because I just can’t understand how the logistics of this went down. How can two people get stabbed together? Wouldn’t one run for it and call 911? Were their deaths staggered and at different times? If OJ did this, he wood he holding a knife with one dominant hand and how can he hold two people down with the other ?

The prosecutions/Marcias story is Ron must have walked in on the slaying and tried to play hero (I doubt anyone would walk to a bloody mess like that and confront but let’s say he did that). Darden contradicts Marcia Clark’s own argument by saying seeing Ron and Nicole together set OJ off.

Cochran was able to point this out. Anyone who didn’t have the TV coverage knew the prosecution was screwed. The timeline and logistics imply more than one killer or assailant .

As you can tell, I went down the rabbit hole years ago of this case , and I find it fascinating how every single person even marginally connected to this case seemed super messed up from OJ , his older son, the cops, the neighbors , Nicole’s friends, Ron’s friends and family . What a messed up web and group of people these all were.

[Anonymous]

How would he hold a knife*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were able to bring top of the line scientists and forensic experts to explain how EDTA isn’t man made and how two human stabbings leading to no blood in the getaway vehicle or home is absurd and not humanly possible. Stabbings of the chest are basically as bloody and messy as open heart surgery.

The jury made the right decision . The prosecutions entire case relied on the cops /Furhman and his racist tapes , the missing blood from the vial, and the EDTA found on the sock ruined it.

Usually, someone without OJ’s money , like a Scott Peterson is screwed when it comes to fighting the police detectives work but OJ went broke to hire the best of the best

Why on earth would the police try to pin a heinous murder on Scott Peterson? Wouldn’t they be more concerned about public safety, when there was a deranged lunatic running around snatching up pregnant women and murdering them?

The police try to solve crimes to keep the public safe. Yes, sometimes they’re corrupt, but most of the time, they are looking to solve crimes and get dangerous perpetrators off the streets. They had nothing to gain from railroading Scott Peterson.

Your comment make me wish there was an iq test for having children and voting.

I think you’re the one in need of an Iq test and your brain examined . If you had a problem with your neighbor Suzie, and Suzie perishes, if no leads or traces come in, you will become a suspect just because you once had a contentious history with Suzie. It’s enough for someone to build motive even if no forensic evidence is on the scene tying you to it. Cops’ jobs are to pin it on someone. They will even find eyewitnesses who will say you were there even if you weren’t there because people naturally skew their memories to help the police since they’re the so called good guys.

“Wrong place, wrong time” has convicted many innocent people. Scott going fishing and Nicole’s exaggerated diaries for spousal support don’t mean they did the crimes. Only the forensic evidence on the scene can prove that. There is no forensics tying Scott or OJ to the deaths and no hair, blood, or clothing of the victims in their homes. Do you know how long and how personal a strangulation and stabbing is? Skin, sweat, fingerprints, blood, clothing , hair would be all over the place .

Do you know many thousands of people are getting their convictions overturned for crimes they didn’t ever commit ? It simply is because they had the last conflict with the victim that cops pin it on them and plant the evidence/make the states case . The burden of proof is on the state to find a suspect, convict, and sentence.

Conviction rates are how sherriffs get elected and judges and prosecutors as well . The truth is most people that kill are expert enough to leave no obvious trace behind but having so many cold cases/murder mysteries are just a bad look for any district so they need to be wrapped up and solved.

In reality, it often takes years to actually crack a case. Rushing things is what causes bad police work and detective work.

Please stop, you are really dumb and only making people feel sorry for you.

No man goes fishing on Christmas Eve when his wife is eight months pregnant. The fact that you don’t get that speaks to your stupidity. You don’t need CSI type evidence to convict someone of murder. You do realize people used to get convicted for crimes before DNA was a thing, right?!?!

In Scott Peterson’s case and in OJ’s it was the totality of all of the “coincidences” that proved their guilt to anyone with a sliver of common sense.

You see yourself as an advocate for the wrongfully accused, but you are just a simpleton with absolutely no common sense.

Men also shouldn’t cheat when their wives are pregnant or at all. Scott wasn’t the doting type obviously. He would absolutely be the type to go fishing . Laci was also mopping the kitchen at eight months pregnant before he left. What a Prince , right?

That’s still not enough to convict.

Why are you making it about me instead of the posts I’ve presented from various witnesses, authors, and experts?

Can anyone explain why the cops didn’t look into that home being burglarized that Laci possibly crossed paths with , and the EDTA , sealed phone records of Nicole from that evening , and Ron’s criminal record being sealed because he was a confidential informant .

The police did look at the house that was burglarized, the Miranda house. They found the burglars, investigated them, arrested them for burglary and determined that the two men who robbed the house: 1) did so after Laci went missing and 2) had absolutely nothing to do with her disappearance.

Just because you keep repeating the same lies doesn’t make them true.

[Anonymous]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4_v_yrOji2/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

Chappelle on OJ

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For people who have spent any time as victims or with victims of domestic violence, this case was cut and dried. OJ beat his wife and then finally killed her and Ron Goldman, who was in the wrong place.

They were victims who were then dragged through the mud by the press and all the armchair lawyers and forensic pathologists like the people on this thread. They could not speak for themselves because he stabbed them to death so other people killed them again.

How the case turned out is immaterial to the fact that he did it.

It’s not cut and dry. That’s circumstantial which can’t be used to convict . Only forensic evidence matters. There was no forensic evidence that linked Scott Peterson. He was convicted simply because he had an affair and told his AP his wife was gone .

No forensics found in his home, warehouses, or boat to prove Scott had a struggle and killed his wife in those places .

As for the case with OJ, the forensics here are questionable due to the EDTA found and the lead detectives racial motivations /sentiments . Also, the timeline doesn’t add up either. Catching a limo and boarding a flight 15 minutes after hacking two people to death would be impossible. He would be leaking their blood/leaning a trail everywhere he moved yet the Bronco and limo weren’t washed for blood and O.J. had wall to wall carpet in his bedroom in his home . No blood stains found there either.

Nicole and Oj’s contentious divorce/relationship doesn’t prove anything about the murders. Lots of divorced couples get into fights about the kids or anything else . That doesn’t mean one killed a person. Nicole wouldn’t have told O.J. about sleeping with Marcus Allen or about her dating life if he was possessive or jealous over her. OJ wouldn’t have befriended and invited the kids’ babysitter/Nicole’s male friend Kato Kaelin (a straight man) to live in his guest house if he was a jealous guy.

You lost any credibility when you’re trying to even deny he was a jealous guy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So a murderer died?

Yup. Lived nearly thirty years longer and spent all that time hunting for the “real” killer. He should have posted to DCUM and enlisted all these great researchers to help him.

All these great researchers? There is one on this thread with no proof of anything he’s spouting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One possibility is Goldman’s convoluted family background. His father Fred Goldman had married a woman named Patti Glass, the ex-wife of a Mafia lawyer and drugs dealer named Marvin Glass.

Goldman had married Patti Glass shortly after Marvin was jailed for his part in a huge drugs money laundering operation, and took custody of three of Glass’ children. According to one of the sons who became part of this makeshift new Goldman family, Fred was cruel and abusive to them.

Was Ron feeding the authorities information about Marvin Glass? Or was Glass, released and in LA on the night of the murders, directly involved in them? According to Glass’ son Brian, his father had developed a deep resentment to Fred Goldman about the perceived mistreatment of his sons whilst he was in prison.

Glass was by the court’s own account a psychotic individual, who by 1994 was dying of AIDS obtained during a blood transfusion. Did he arrange to wreak the ultimate revenge by depriving Fred of his own son Ron?

Simpson himself now apparently promotes the drug theory, at least according to Jeffrey Felix, a prison guard who says he befriended Simpson following his incarceration for armed robbery in 2007. Felix says OJ told him drug dealers had murdered Nicole and Ron over unpaid debts.

If there was anything to this, it is not surprising it was never pursued. The murky nexus of Hollywood, drugs and organised crime has always been Los Angeles’ darkest secret. The tentacles of illegal narcotics dealing spread deep into every aspect of power in the city and as would be uncovered in the years after the trial this very much included the LAPD.

The Ramparts scandal that blew in the late 90s led to the biggest corruption investigation in American law enforcement history. By the end of it dozens of LAPD officers were implicated in various cases of misconduct, many of them involving the theft and dealing of narcotics.

Valid leads that pointed to drugs as a motive for the crime may well have been overlooked by all concerned, precisely because it risked airing too much dirty laundry, whether relevant to the case and not.

Simpson literally told his agent if Nicole hadn’t answered the door with a knife, she’d be alive

[Anonymous]

Innocent people don’t run. Oj wasn’t a black person worried about getting killed by police. They literally escorted him down the road

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jason stopped taking his meds months before the incident .

All of these potential suspects and damning stories were ignored by the LAPD .

Yea, they stopped researching any other possibility when Oj’s blood was mixed with Nicole’s everywhere. Watch the Oj interrogation when they get back from Chicago

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were able to bring top of the line scientists and forensic experts to explain how EDTA isn’t man made and how two human stabbings leading to no blood in the getaway vehicle or home is absurd and not humanly possible. Stabbings of the chest are basically as bloody and messy as open heart surgery.

The jury made the right decision . The prosecutions entire case relied on the cops /Furhman and his racist tapes , the missing blood from the vial, and the EDTA found on the sock ruined it.

Usually, someone without OJ’s money , like a Scott Peterson is screwed when it comes to fighting the police detectives work but OJ went broke to hire the best of the best

Why on earth would the police try to pin a heinous murder on Scott Peterson? Wouldn’t they be more concerned about public safety, when there was a deranged lunatic running around snatching up pregnant women and murdering them?

The police try to solve crimes to keep the public safe. Yes, sometimes they’re corrupt, but most of the time, they are looking to solve crimes and get dangerous perpetrators off the streets. They had nothing to gain from railroading Scott Peterson.

Your comment make me wish there was an iq test for having children and voting.

I think you’re the one in need of an Iq test and your brain examined . If you had a problem with your neighbor Suzie, and Suzie perishes, if no leads or traces come in, you will become a suspect just because you once had a contentious history with Suzie. It’s enough for someone to build motive even if no forensic evidence is on the scene tying you to it. Cops’ jobs are to pin it on someone. They will even find eyewitnesses who will say you were there even if you weren’t there because people naturally skew their memories to help the police since they’re the so called good guys.

“Wrong place, wrong time” has convicted many innocent people. Scott going fishing and Nicole’s exaggerated diaries for spousal support don’t mean they did the crimes. Only the forensic evidence on the scene can prove that. There is no forensics tying Scott or OJ to the deaths and no hair, blood, or clothing of the victims in their homes. Do you know how long and how personal a strangulation and stabbing is? Skin, sweat, fingerprints, blood, clothing , hair would be all over the place .

Do you know many thousands of people are getting their convictions overturned for crimes they didn’t ever commit ? It simply is because they had the last conflict with the victim that cops pin it on them and plant the evidence/make the states case . The burden of proof is on the state to find a suspect, convict, and sentence.

Conviction rates are how sherriffs get elected and judges and prosecutors as well . The truth is most people that kill are expert enough to leave no obvious trace behind but having so many cold cases/murder mysteries are just a bad look for any district so they need to be wrapped up and solved.

In reality, it often takes years to actually crack a case. Rushing things is what causes bad police work and detective work.

The problem here is that the evidence was overwhelming for Oj and his lawyers didn’t even believe what he was selling. They asked him how the DNA could matched and were perplexed by it. The jury wanted payback and knew he was guilty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also explain why the Bronco had no blood in it, why Faye Resnick ran away, why she moved in with Nicole and within days , Nicole’s dead, her connections to shady guys and being a potential call girl /Heidi Fleiss girl ? And of course, Jason Simpson . His restraining orders , knife threats /assaults on previous employer and girlfriend , his use and discontinuation of Depakote for bipolar , his past suicide attempts and general troubled history ?

Nicole was supposed to dine with her family at Jason’s restaurant and then changed plans to Mezzaluna.

There were lots of potential other suspects that just fell through the cracks .

This isn’t even true. They did find blood in the bronco. Making up facts doesn’t make them true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Menendez Brothers were also unfairly maligned but now they may be released as it’s come out their father was sexually abusing them since childhood.

Wanna take a hunch who didn’t take their word for it? Lapd

What? A jury didn’t take their word for it but also abuse wasn’t allowed in 2nd trial so there’s that.

Oj, no shadow of a doubt, he did it and you fall for the same thing Trumpers do. Maybe, it was this, that, someone else, instead of trump.
Deflection doesn’t work for Oj. The evidence was overwhelming

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One possibility is Goldman’s convoluted family background. His father Fred Goldman had married a woman named Patti Glass, the ex-wife of a Mafia lawyer and drugs dealer named Marvin Glass.

Goldman had married Patti Glass shortly after Marvin was jailed for his part in a huge drugs money laundering operation, and took custody of three of Glass’ children. According to one of the sons who became part of this makeshift new Goldman family, Fred was cruel and abusive to them.

Was Ron feeding the authorities information about Marvin Glass? Or was Glass, released and in LA on the night of the murders, directly involved in them? According to Glass’ son Brian, his father had developed a deep resentment to Fred Goldman about the perceived mistreatment of his sons whilst he was in prison.

Glass was by the court’s own account a psychotic individual, who by 1994 was dying of AIDS obtained during a blood transfusion. Did he arrange to wreak the ultimate revenge by depriving Fred of his own son Ron?

Simpson himself now apparently promotes the drug theory, at least according to Jeffrey Felix, a prison guard who says he befriended Simpson following his incarceration for armed robbery in 2007. Felix says OJ told him drug dealers had murdered Nicole and Ron over unpaid debts.

If there was anything to this, it is not surprising it was never pursued. The murky nexus of Hollywood, drugs and organised crime has always been Los Angeles’ darkest secret. The tentacles of illegal narcotics dealing spread deep into every aspect of power in the city and as would be uncovered in the years after the trial this very much included the LAPD.

The Ramparts scandal that blew in the late 90s led to the biggest corruption investigation in American law enforcement history. By the end of it dozens of LAPD officers were implicated in various cases of misconduct, many of them involving the theft and dealing of narcotics.

Valid leads that pointed to drugs as a motive for the crime may well have been overlooked by all concerned, precisely because it risked airing too much dirty laundry, whether relevant to the case and not.

Simpson literally told his agent if Nicole hadn’t answered the door with a knife, she’d be alive

Do you believe that? Agents lie. Hearsay and eyewitness testimony is notoriously shaky. What matters is the scene and again nobody has any reasonable expalanation as to why the Bronco was clean , why EDTA was found on the sock and gate, and why the glove and sock didn’t appear in evidence until weeks later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Menendez Brothers were also unfairly maligned but now they may be released as it’s come out their father was sexually abusing them since childhood.

Wanna take a hunch who didn’t take their word for it? Lapd

What? A jury didn’t take their word for it but also abuse wasn’t allowed in 2nd trial so there’s that.

Oj, no shadow of a doubt, he did it and you fall for the same thing Trumpers do. Maybe, it was this, that, someone else, instead of trump.
Deflection doesn’t work for Oj. The evidence was overwhelming

Omg. The evidence was not overwhelming. In fact, it was obviously falsified . this will be my last post here as it is obvious people here aren’t open minded .

I don’t think that crime was done by one singular person. You can’t hold a knife, someone’s body, and then another body and a dog unless you have a third hand around