IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

You know the guy was convicted of a $60M fraud, right?

And, please tell us who his business partner was.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

Not going to read anything by Miranda Devine. She’s a Trump fangirl and a Big Lie proponent. Do you have any credible sources to quote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

Not going to read anything by Miranda Devine. She’s a Trump fangirl and a Big Lie proponent. Do you have any credible sources to quote?

That's right, blame the messenger.

Didn't Miranda Devine report on Hunter's laptop--you know the one that 52 former intelligence people claimed had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation? And, that Biden stated in the debate that they said it was Russian disinformation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

Not going to read anything by Miranda Devine. She’s a Trump fangirl and a Big Lie proponent. Do you have any credible sources to quote?

That's right, blame the messenger.

Didn't Miranda Devine report on Hunter's laptop--you know the one that 52 former intelligence people claimed had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation? And, that Biden stated in the debate that they said it was Russian disinformation.

I generally don't get my news from Twitter. And I don't tend to really pay attention to a news story until several mainstream publications report on it. But you do you...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

Not going to read anything by Miranda Devine. She’s a Trump fangirl and a Big Lie proponent. Do you have any credible sources to quote?

That's right, blame the messenger.

Didn't Miranda Devine report on Hunter's laptop--you know the one that 52 former intelligence people claimed had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation? And, that Biden stated in the debate that they said it was Russian disinformation.

I generally don't get my news from Twitter. And I don't tend to really pay attention to a news story until several mainstream publications report on it. But you do you...

Fox News has the letter asking the judge to demand Archer's surrender. Wonder why? He is schedule to testify tomorrow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

Not going to read anything by Miranda Devine. She’s a Trump fangirl and a Big Lie proponent. Do you have any credible sources to quote?

That's right, blame the messenger.

Didn't Miranda Devine report on Hunter's laptop--you know the one that 52 former intelligence people claimed had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation? And, that Biden stated in the debate that they said it was Russian disinformation.

I generally don't get my news from Twitter. And I don't tend to really pay attention to a news story until several mainstream publications report on it. But you do you...

Fox News has the letter asking the judge to demand Archer's surrender. Wonder why? He is schedule to testify tomorrow

Yes pretty interesting that Fox would have a letter? Let’s face it not even the republicans of the committee care. They all went on vacation …lol! Maybe you should do they same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The timing of this from the DOJ is interesting.

Not going to read anything by Miranda Devine. She’s a Trump fangirl and a Big Lie proponent. Do you have any credible sources to quote?

That's right, blame the messenger.

Didn't Miranda Devine report on Hunter's laptop--you know the one that 52 former intelligence people claimed had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation? And, that Biden stated in the debate that they said it was Russian disinformation.

I generally don't get my news from Twitter. And I don't tend to really pay attention to a news story until several mainstream publications report on it. But you do you...

Fox News has the letter asking the judge to demand Archer's surrender. Wonder why? He is schedule to testify tomorrow

More right wing misinformation:
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/30/devon-archer-hunter-biden-testimony-00108902

[Anonymous]

This isn't hard. Archer lost his appeal, so now it is time to face the pokey. It has NOTHING to do with Hunter Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn't hard. Archer lost his appeal, so now it is time to face the pokey. It has NOTHING to do with Hunter Biden.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weiss is going to be forced to drop the charges now. No way he can prosecute with the investigators on record saying they refused to turn over exculpatory evidence.

Actually, Merrick Garland should appoint a special prosecutor as he should have done from the beginning.

Why? If Barr couldn't prosecute anything and didn't think it was worth pursuing, what has changed? The FBI and DOJ have known the facts since at least 2019.

What has changed? The president.

Biden's DOJ cannot be relied on to investigate and prosecute a case involving the president's son. And, then there is the possibility that the president himself may be implicated.

Trump appointed Weiss to investigate and prosecute. Biden has not touched him, Garland has not touched him. He has the ability to investigate and prosecute as needed. Or are you saying that Trump appointed someone who should not have been appointed?

Trump appointee who had to be approved by the Democrat Senators from Delaware, just like the judges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CEFC chairman Ye Jianming, director Zang and Patrick Ho paid Hunter and Jim Biden millions. Exact same guys, same company, same modus operandi in the FARA charges slapped on Israeli fugitive Gal Luft, only he was paid a lot less. Luft's lobbying was of a retired CIA director on his think tank advisory board, not the then current vice president who ferried Hunter to Beijing with him on Air Force Two for an official visit with President Xi.

Double standard?

JFC, do a tiny bit of research. This is from the New Yorker in 2019.

Hunter was on the board of the World Food Program USA, a nonprofit that generates support for the U.N. World Food Programme, and he had hoped that Ye would make a large aid donation. At dinner that night [in 2017], they discussed the donation, and then the conversation turned to business opportunities. Hunter offered to use his contacts to help identify investment opportunities for Ye’s company, CEFC China Energy, in liquefied-natural-gas projects in the United States.

… Hunter began negotiating a deal for CEFC to invest forty million dollars in a liquefied-natural-gas project on Monkey Island, in Louisiana, which, he said, was projected to create thousands of jobs. “I was more proud of it than you can imagine,” he told me.

… In February, 2018, Ye was detained by Chinese authorities, reportedly as part of an anti-corruption investigation, and the deal with Hunter fell through. Hunter said that he did not consider Ye to be a “shady character at all,” and characterized the outcome as “bad luck.”

So, this was a legitimate business partnership, not a bribe, not lobbying, not representing the Chinese government, so nothing at all like the Israeli arms dealer, and it happened in 2017 and 2018 when Joe Biden was not in office and not a candidate for President. Where’s the crime, dipshits?

The Chinese disappeared Yi, and let Bidens keep the money. The Curse of Monkey Island indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn't hard. Archer lost his appeal, so now it is time to face the pokey. It has NOTHING to do with Hunter Biden.

I would believe that if this happened on a Monday instead of a Saturday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CEFC chairman Ye Jianming, director Zang and Patrick Ho paid Hunter and Jim Biden millions. Exact same guys, same company, same modus operandi in the FARA charges slapped on Israeli fugitive Gal Luft, only he was paid a lot less. Luft's lobbying was of a retired CIA director on his think tank advisory board, not the then current vice president who ferried Hunter to Beijing with him on Air Force Two for an official visit with President Xi.

Double standard?

JFC, do a tiny bit of research. This is from the New Yorker in 2019.

Hunter was on the board of the World Food Program USA, a nonprofit that generates support for the U.N. World Food Programme, and he had hoped that Ye would make a large aid donation. At dinner that night [in 2017], they discussed the donation, and then the conversation turned to business opportunities. Hunter offered to use his contacts to help identify investment opportunities for Ye’s company, CEFC China Energy, in liquefied-natural-gas projects in the United States.

… Hunter began negotiating a deal for CEFC to invest forty million dollars in a liquefied-natural-gas project on Monkey Island, in Louisiana, which, he said, was projected to create thousands of jobs. “I was more proud of it than you can imagine,” he told me.

… In February, 2018, Ye was detained by Chinese authorities, reportedly as part of an anti-corruption investigation, and the deal with Hunter fell through. Hunter said that he did not consider Ye to be a “shady character at all,” and characterized the outcome as “bad luck.”

So, this was a legitimate business partnership, not a bribe, not lobbying, not representing the Chinese government, so nothing at all like the Israeli arms dealer, and it happened in 2017 and 2018 when Joe Biden was not in office and not a candidate for President. Where’s the crime, dipshits?

The Chinese disappeared Yi, and let Bidens keep the money. The Curse of Monkey Island indeed.

That’s stupid. The money was a retainer from Ye and Hunter performed the work on the project. The Chinese government didn’t “let him keep the money.” It wasn’t their money. They had nothing to do with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Weiss is going to be forced to drop the charges now. No way he can prosecute with the investigators on record saying they refused to turn over exculpatory evidence.

Actually, Merrick Garland should appoint a special prosecutor as he should have done from the beginning.

Why? If Barr couldn't prosecute anything and didn't think it was worth pursuing, what has changed? The FBI and DOJ have known the facts since at least 2019.

What has changed? The president.

Biden's DOJ cannot be relied on to investigate and prosecute a case involving the president's son. And, then there is the possibility that the president himself may be implicated.

Trump appointed Weiss to investigate and prosecute. Biden has not touched him, Garland has not touched him. He has the ability to investigate and prosecute as needed. Or are you saying that Trump appointed someone who should not have been appointed?

Trump appointee who had to be approved by the Democrat Senators from Delaware, just like the judges.

Not to menrioned appointed twice by Obama as Acting AG and Interium AG.

[Anonymous]