The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love that the List had an entire article on Usha's horrible shoes. We have already discussed almost all of these.

https://www.thelist.com/1862422/usha-vance-footwear-fashion-fails-rival-senior-citizen-sneakers/

In the pic at the top of the article, Usha's hair looks amazing (if she dyed it and had this style it would be a knock out the park--30s is too young to succumb to gray hair)

The article picked the worst pics to show her shoes you could barely see them.

Didn't go to the link this time but I think I know which pic that was, with her hair styled. I thought the style was great and lively.

DP, and I agree this is one of the best photos of Usha:

Her hair looks good here (for once), but her eyes look dead. That's a not a real smile. I imagine she is sad being stuck in her life. She's a brown woman trying to make it among racists. Good luck.

[Anonymous]

In this unphotoshopped pic, her face is still scary. Eye makeup is too heavy. Her hair is too long.

But the dress is nice. I’d wear it. Can someone locate it online?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love that the List had an entire article on Usha's horrible shoes. We have already discussed almost all of these.

https://www.thelist.com/1862422/usha-vance-footwear-fashion-fails-rival-senior-citizen-sneakers/

In the pic at the top of the article, Usha's hair looks amazing (if she dyed it and had this style it would be a knock out the park--30s is too young to succumb to gray hair)

The article picked the worst pics to show her shoes you could barely see them.

Didn't go to the link this time but I think I know which pic that was, with her hair styled. I thought the style was great and lively.

DP, and I agree this is one of the best photos of Usha:

Her hair looks good here (for once), but her eyes look dead. That's a not a real smile. I imagine she is sad being stuck in her life. She's a brown woman trying to make it among racists. Good luck.

C'mon. Her eyes do not look dead. She has bags that could be addressed with better makeup, but they look engaged. And I actually think one of Usha's best features is her smile. It really does seem genuine when she smiles.

I'm a pretty vocal critic here of her boring and always-a-little-off fashion, but there's enough real stuff that we don't need to make stuff up about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another Royalty/US crossover - This time with that man, Usha, and the Crown Prince and Princess of Jordan. Usha looks... fine. Appropriate. She is being out-fashioned by Rajwa.

I am her biggest hater but this is...fine

The top looks like a shell (not a seashell but the kind of base layer of clothing called a "shell"), looks like it needs a blazer, cardigan, wrap, scarf or something to complete the look.

No, it's blissfully simple.

Simple would have been a sleeveless sweater or sleeveless silk knit top with an interesting neckline. Not a shell in woven polyester that is obviously meant to be worn under something.

I bet you're the poster who always advocates "nice slacks, a lovely silk scarf, and a spritz of perfume" when people ask for clothing advice. Her top is obviously silk, not polyester.

No, it is not obviously silk, it doesn't look like silk (and yes different fabrics have different looks, another example, an acrylic sweater does not look wool).

Your "I bet" doesn't make any sense...when you are prone to put words in people's mouths, of course you think you know what they will say in random circumstances

Sorry, her top was definitely silk. But thanks for the lecture about different fabrics looking different, I had no idea!

NP, but I would say questionable. I can see her bra through it on one side, which doesn’t normally happen with a silk shell and is most unfortunate. You would think they would photoshop that out?

This is silly. Unless it's very cheap poly, you can't tell the difference in a picture at this resolution. There is also a lot of low quality silk and high quality poly these days.

Yes, you can tell the difference. The sheen, drape, texture are different between the two.

Do you all think this might be the blouse: https://www.brooksbrothers.com/sleeveless-shell-in-washable-silk/WV01334.html

Yes.

BUT IS IT SILK?!
Jk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

In this unphotoshopped pic, her face is still scary. Eye makeup is too heavy. Her hair is too long.

But the dress is nice. I’d wear it. Can someone locate it online?

Just read Vampyra's Wiki. There ARE photos. In it I learned that she is the child of an immigrant and maybe a POC. She was married but got pregnant with another man. She cheated with Don Jr while he was married but I think we know that and she was a lingerie model. Recently, she was sued for sexual harassment and is very naughty but in a thirsty way which makes me uncomfortable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberly_Guilfoyle#:~:text=Their%20divorce%20was%20final%20on,birth%20to%20their%20son%2C%20Ronan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think we can all agree that Usha looking like a normal woman is much preferrable than Usha looking like a Trump woman.

“I think we can all agree that Usha looking like a normal woman is much preferable than Usha looking like a Trump woman” relies on a couple of rhetorical moves.

It uses an appeal to false consensus with the phrase “I think we can all agree,” which suggests universal agreement where none has been demonstrated. This pressures the audience into accepting the statement as common sense or mainstream.

It also relies on loaded language, contrasting “normal woman” with “Trump woman” in a way that assigns positive value to one and negative value to the other, steering the audience without providing evidence.

Finally, it presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as only between two possibilities, ignoring other options or more nuanced perspectives.