Is this true if you only look at top 25 schools? |
For the most part, yes. Sometimes the ratio is not terribly different, but most schools now have a larger female population. |
It is not true in many of the land grant state schools or STEM focused schools. It is true in the liberal arts types of schools. |
Less true at top 25 universities because they have enough applicants that they can admit a quality gender balanced class even if their applicant pool skews heavily women. You can look this up in the common data set. Some top schools applicant pools are 60% or more women but the resulting class is closer to 50/50. |
Very true at most of the SLACs, which is why they are so competitive for female applicants. |
GIRL POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
May our daughters take over the world that white men will leave a mess - typical! |
In dateconomics the author talks about this being an issue why college educated women can't find college educated men to marry and predicts the numbers will become worse. |
Book Summary:
"It’s not that he’s just not that into you—it’s that there aren’t enough of him. And the numbers prove it. Using a combination of demographics, statistics, game theory, and number-crunching, Date-onomics tells what every single, college-educated, heterosexual, looking-for-a-partner woman needs to know: The “man deficit” is real. It’s a fascinating, if sobering read, with two critical takeaways: One, it’s not you. Two, knowledge is power, so here’s what to do about it. The shortage of college-educated men is not just a big-city phenomenon frustrating women in New York and L.A. Among young college grads, there are four eligible women for every three men nationwide. This unequal ratio explains not only why it’s so hard to find a date, but a host of social issues, from the college hookup culture to the reason Salt Lake City is becoming the breast implant capital of America." |
That book is completely bullshit because it wants to have its cake and eat it too. It wants women to be equal earners and equally educated with men (great idea - truly fully support this but hasn't been this historic norm) but it doesn't want women to do what men have done since the beginning of time (date and marry someone of lower education/lower earners). So yes 'it is you'. "you" are free to be as open minded as men when it comes to dating (i.e. change the historical norm for women just as the female education/earning gap has changed over history), which would relieve pressure in the 'market place'. |
From the latest CDS
UPENN: Applied (Men): 18286 Applied (Women): 17580 Accepted (Men): 1771 Accepted (Women): 1947 For Penn, the posters are wrong - women definitely get a boost at penn. CDS doesn't break down gpa and sat's by gender but my hypothesis for Penn is that Wharton is the hardest school to get into penn and is very attractive to men and Penn has a big nursing school (which is a lot easier to get into) that attracts a lot more women. |
Harvard:
Applied (Men): 18327 Applied (Women): 16696 Accepted (Men): 1092 Accepted (Women): 955 |
Yale:
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who applied 14,803 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who applied 16,129 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who were admitted 1,020 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who were admitted 930 Girls love yale. posters are correct for aspiring Elis. |
Stanford:
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who applied: 22,536 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who applied: 19,631 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who were admitted: 1,083 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who were admitted: 1,062 STEM name brand so it makes sense. More male applicants. |
Princeton:
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who applied: 14614 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who applied:12676 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who were admitted:1003 Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who were admitted: 945 More male competition and harder to get in @ P |