"majority of college students female"

Anonymous
Is this true if you only look at top 25 schools?
Anonymous
For the most part, yes. Sometimes the ratio is not terribly different, but most schools now have a larger female population.
Anonymous
It is not true in many of the land grant state schools or STEM focused schools. It is true in the liberal arts types of schools.
Anonymous
Less true at top 25 universities because they have enough applicants that they can admit a quality gender balanced class even if their applicant pool skews heavily women. You can look this up in the common data set. Some top schools applicant pools are 60% or more women but the resulting class is closer to 50/50.
Anonymous
Very true at most of the SLACs, which is why they are so competitive for female applicants.
Anonymous
GIRL POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous
May our daughters take over the world that white men will leave a mess - typical!
Anonymous
In dateconomics the author talks about this being an issue why college educated women can't find college educated men to marry and predicts the numbers will become worse.
Anonymous
Book Summary:
"It’s not that he’s just not that into you—it’s that there aren’t enough of him. And the numbers prove it. Using a combination of demographics, statistics, game theory, and number-crunching, Date-onomics tells what every single, college-educated, heterosexual, looking-for-a-partner woman needs to know: The “man deficit” is real. It’s a fascinating, if sobering read, with two critical takeaways: One, it’s not you. Two, knowledge is power, so here’s what to do about it.

The shortage of college-educated men is not just a big-city phenomenon frustrating women in New York and L.A. Among young college grads, there are four eligible women for every three men nationwide. This unequal ratio explains not only why it’s so hard to find a date, but a host of social issues, from the college hookup culture to the reason Salt Lake City is becoming the breast implant capital of America."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Book Summary:
"It’s not that he’s just not that into you—it’s that there aren’t enough of him. And the numbers prove it. Using a combination of demographics, statistics, game theory, and number-crunching, Date-onomics tells what every single, college-educated, heterosexual, looking-for-a-partner woman needs to know: The “man deficit” is real. It’s a fascinating, if sobering read, with two critical takeaways: One, it’s not you. Two, knowledge is power, so here’s what to do about it.

The shortage of college-educated men is not just a big-city phenomenon frustrating women in New York and L.A. Among young college grads, there are four eligible women for every three men nationwide. This unequal ratio explains not only why it’s so hard to find a date, but a host of social issues, from the college hookup culture to the reason Salt Lake City is becoming the breast implant capital of America."


That book is completely bullshit because it wants to have its cake and eat it too. It wants women to be equal earners and equally educated with men (great idea - truly fully support this but hasn't been this historic norm) but it doesn't want women to do what men have done since the beginning of time (date and marry someone of lower education/lower earners).

So yes 'it is you'. "you" are free to be as open minded as men when it comes to dating (i.e. change the historical norm for women just as the female education/earning gap has changed over history), which would relieve pressure in the 'market place'.

Anonymous
From the latest CDS

UPENN:

Applied (Men): 18286
Applied (Women): 17580

Accepted (Men): 1771
Accepted (Women): 1947

For Penn, the posters are wrong - women definitely get a boost at penn. CDS doesn't break down gpa and sat's by gender but my hypothesis for Penn is that Wharton is the hardest school to get into penn and is very attractive to men and Penn has a big nursing school (which is a lot easier to get into) that attracts a lot more women.
Anonymous
Harvard:

Applied (Men): 18327
Applied (Women): 16696

Accepted (Men): 1092
Accepted (Women): 955
Anonymous
Yale:

Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who applied 14,803
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who applied 16,129
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who were admitted 1,020
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who were admitted 930

Girls love yale. posters are correct for aspiring Elis.
Anonymous
Stanford:

Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who applied: 22,536
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who applied: 19,631
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who were admitted: 1,083
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who were admitted: 1,062

STEM name brand so it makes sense. More male applicants.
Anonymous
Princeton:

Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who applied: 14614
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who applied:12676
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) men who were admitted:1003
Total first-time, first-year (freshman) women who were admitted: 945

More male competition and harder to get in @ P
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: