Robin Hood just ended trading on GameStop and AMC

[Anonymous]

from T. Rowe Price:

enator Warren sort of talked about a tax. That is sort of
a tax on the system. All the money that the high frequency
crowd is taking out--they are not taking risk overnight, they
are flat every day, they never lose money--all the profits they
are making are coming from someone else. That might be the
longer-term investors, everybody in their 401(k)s, their 529
plans, et cetera.
So, we are very concerned about intraday volatility and
that is why we would like to see some pilot programs to
examine, can we constrain that a little bit? Can we make the
markets a little deeper, a little more transparent to bring
that intraday volatility in, narrow it? We do not have the
answer until we try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Frankly, you should have to hold any stock you buy for at least 3 months. Also, when you put in a buy or sell, a random number generator should choose the time when it occurs during the next day.

This would ruin al sorts of HFT firms. They don't hold any stocks for a single day and have no positions when they close. Somewhat agree though. Or just have a transaction tax.

Good. What value do they provide beyond enriching themselves by skimming from others?

Is that what our stock market is for?

Yes. They provide liquidity. That means whenever someone needs to sell there is a buyer. They make money but provide a real service. Your idea on the random number generator is illegal. It would breach a large number of duties and if you did that it would create yet another place for mischief at the securities firms.

Not a popular opinion here but markets work fine. There are issues from time to time. But most of this nonsense this week comes from people who do not know what they are doing or what they are talking about.

How can you say they work fine when Tesla is so over valued? when the stock market didn't go down during COVID? I trust Elizabeth Warren, and she says it is not fine.

Tesla's stock is kept from going higher by shorts. It's the reason he is stoking WSB and GME.

[Anonymous]

Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

You are wrong. When people's recklessness and idiocy endangers our nation, it is time for regulation. Look at 2008. Look at 1929. Look at 6 Jan. People need regulation. Very few people are libertarians and I strongly suspect most so-called liberatarians would hate if they actually got what they are asking for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

You are wrong. When people's recklessness and idiocy endangers our nation, it is time for regulation. Look at 2008. Look at 1929. Look at 6 Jan. People need regulation. Very few people are libertarians and I strongly suspect most so-called liberatarians would hate if they actually got what they are asking for.

What would you regulate? What is the new regulation?

2008 regulation was foolish, not well thought out and did nothing real. Want that again? PR victory but that is all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

You are wrong. When people's recklessness and idiocy endangers our nation, it is time for regulation. Look at 2008. Look at 1929. Look at 6 Jan. People need regulation. Very few people are libertarians and I strongly suspect most so-called liberatarians would hate if they actually got what they are asking for.

What would you regulate? What is the new regulation?

2008 regulation was foolish, not well thought out and did nothing real. Want that again? PR victory but that is all.

If we never allow big money to fail it just gets worse. The potential fallout is contained according to the analysts. Just let it play out. We can tinker with the short versus long term capital gains tax rates, incentivize dividends over buybacks, decrease margin rates etc.but something drastic will cause more problems than it solves. The market is insane because there is nowhere else to put money. This is what happens when interest rates have been close to zero for over a decade.

[Anonymous]

The plan does not seem to be working today for GME. WSB said Friday was going to be some big magic moment, and that never happened. They'll wear out soon. Days of anxiously watching the ticker go down and then up leaves them nothing to do but ponder what it means to their bottom line if they are the last to sell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The plan does not seem to be working today for GME. WSB said Friday was going to be some big magic moment, and that never happened. They'll wear out soon. Days of anxiously watching the ticker go down and then up leaves them nothing to do but ponder what it means to their bottom line if they are the last to sell.

It went to $450 on thursday night/friday morning. It was a big moment but a lot of the pressure was relieved by the forced thursday selling.

It will wear out, you are stating the obvious. Everyone knows that and knew that. Those that are still holding generally did cash out some on friday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

You are wrong. When people's recklessness and idiocy endangers our nation, it is time for regulation. Look at 2008. Look at 1929. Look at 6 Jan. People need regulation. Very few people are libertarians and I strongly suspect most so-called liberatarians would hate if they actually got what they are asking for.

What would you regulate? What is the new regulation?

2008 regulation was foolish, not well thought out and did nothing real. Want that again? PR victory but that is all.

Whatever regulations Elizabeth Warren wants. She knows her stuff, and is for the common person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

This is an argument that market bubbles do not matter.

Even Alan Greenspan didn't believe that, an he is an Ayn Rand devotee. Alan Greenspan not only acknowledged that they matter, but he admitted that his biggest mistake was to believe that markets would regulate them. They didn't.

The government controls the money supply. The government chooses to keep interest rates low. And therefore the government assumes responsibility for the secondary effects of that policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l9cz1k/for_everyone_that_just_joined_because_of_gme_and/

This is exactly why WSB is going to ruin a lot of individuals who get suckered into a ponzi scheme. Tiny disclaimer at the bottom does not absolve them of guilt.

Regular people will go bankrupt listening to this. Meanwhile Melvin Capital will have a bad year, and then they will keep on managing a hedge fund until they retire.

If this frenzy is artificially popped by tilting the scales even further in favor of the hedge funds then the people you are concerned about will get hurt worse. We have to let this play out naturally. Those risks are forseeable. The risks of popping this artificially are not.

No, those people will get hurt by the same amount. There will be fewer winners in the ponzi scheme though.

And frankly there is no "scales tipping" going on. If you are butthurt about Thursday, get a bigger and better broker. Honestly you can't expect to take on the seventh fleet from a speedboat with a machine gun on it. Talk about how a little company like Robin Hood somehow rigged the system is a conspiracy theory. And ultimately the SEC will write a report that says they were in danger of going below their required capital ratios. WSB will, like good conspiracy theorists, claim that this is proof that "THE CONSPIRACY GOES EVEN DEEPER".

The WSB instructions on Thursday were to hold. And RH never restricted holding. WSB was mad that people might sell what they freely own. Think about that.

Ultimately the WSB plan will fall apart because they aren't a unified syndicate with pooled profits, and when profit taking comes, it's every man for himself. There will be no settlement day where the people who got in at $300 or $400 get money. You could already be suckered. For all you know, some of the paper multimillionaires may have already hedged their positions. If you are relying on their portfolio screenshots to tell the truth, good luck with that. The guy who started this never intended to launch a crusade to destroy short selling. Why would you expect him to take up the cause now? Fear that his life will be threatened if he does, maybe. It is rational to expect that he is looking out or his family right now. He's a renter who currently has $40M. and knows how to lock in those profits without showing his cards. Not saying he did, but why wouldn't he?

Most squeezes and market cornering efforts fail. Sometimes both sides go down the toilet. And those efforts are an individual or a small group of highly unified individuals. In this case you have thousands of people with indvidual motives. Those range from a $500 bet to "stick it to the man", to someone going all in to pay off college debt, to someone else who doesn't even understand what buying on margin means but sees a boat or a house in his future.

I have seen a few people describe them as "collateral damage". Hey, you aren't a bond villain. You're a person who must weigh the ethics of participating in this scheme based on misinformation, in the same way a member of Congress needs to weigh the ethics of challenging certification of the vote with an uneducated/delusional mob outside.

Wow, how deep in the hole are you? Because this is some hillarious paranoia. It'll be ok, you'll be fine. Cover your shorts and take your losses. You shouldn't be in the game if you can't handle the consequences.

If you must know. I do use multiple of those "real" brokerages. What's more the only position I have in GME are puts. That doesn't change the fundamental analysis of what happened or what will happen. It also doesn't change the policy position I advocate. So called smart money has been taking a pound of flesh from retail constantly. The front run the order flow to take a skim. The pump up penny stocks to start momentum and then crash it when retail jumps in. They do all this simply be virtue of having more capital, more leverage, and more information. For once, due to a confluence of unique situations, they turned the tables and succeeded. They did this through hard work and smart analysis. The idiots should be praised not villified.

And seriously, may a thousand perils rain down upon you for comparing them to seditionist traitors. I dont care how much money you are loosing. That's not cool.

Haha I don't have a dime in this. Your thousand perils missed. And way to go, you're shorting the market, just like the big boys. You're just mad they have more $$, not that they do anything wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l9cz1k/for_everyone_that_just_joined_because_of_gme_and/

This is exactly why WSB is going to ruin a lot of individuals who get suckered into a ponzi scheme. Tiny disclaimer at the bottom does not absolve them of guilt.

Regular people will go bankrupt listening to this. Meanwhile Melvin Capital will have a bad year, and then they will keep on managing a hedge fund until they retire.

If this frenzy is artificially popped by tilting the scales even further in favor of the hedge funds then the people you are concerned about will get hurt worse. We have to let this play out naturally. Those risks are forseeable. The risks of popping this artificially are not.

No, those people will get hurt by the same amount. There will be fewer winners in the ponzi scheme though.

And frankly there is no "scales tipping" going on. If you are butthurt about Thursday, get a bigger and better broker. Honestly you can't expect to take on the seventh fleet from a speedboat with a machine gun on it. Talk about how a little company like Robin Hood somehow rigged the system is a conspiracy theory. And ultimately the SEC will write a report that says they were in danger of going below their required capital ratios. WSB will, like good conspiracy theorists, claim that this is proof that "THE CONSPIRACY GOES EVEN DEEPER".

The WSB instructions on Thursday were to hold. And RH never restricted holding. WSB was mad that people might sell what they freely own. Think about that.

Ultimately the WSB plan will fall apart because they aren't a unified syndicate with pooled profits, and when profit taking comes, it's every man for himself. There will be no settlement day where the people who got in at $300 or $400 get money. You could already be suckered. For all you know, some of the paper multimillionaires may have already hedged their positions. If you are relying on their portfolio screenshots to tell the truth, good luck with that. The guy who started this never intended to launch a crusade to destroy short selling. Why would you expect him to take up the cause now? Fear that his life will be threatened if he does, maybe. It is rational to expect that he is looking out or his family right now. He's a renter who currently has $40M. and knows how to lock in those profits without showing his cards. Not saying he did, but why wouldn't he?

Most squeezes and market cornering efforts fail. Sometimes both sides go down the toilet. And those efforts are an individual or a small group of highly unified individuals. In this case you have thousands of people with indvidual motives. Those range from a $500 bet to "stick it to the man", to someone going all in to pay off college debt, to someone else who doesn't even understand what buying on margin means but sees a boat or a house in his future.

I have seen a few people describe them as "collateral damage". Hey, you aren't a bond villain. You're a person who must weigh the ethics of participating in this scheme based on misinformation, in the same way a member of Congress needs to weigh the ethics of challenging certification of the vote with an uneducated/delusional mob outside.

Wow, how deep in the hole are you? Because this is some hillarious paranoia. It'll be ok, you'll be fine. Cover your shorts and take your losses. You shouldn't be in the game if you can't handle the consequences.

If you must know. I do use multiple of those "real" brokerages. What's more the only position I have in GME are puts. That doesn't change the fundamental analysis of what happened or what will happen. It also doesn't change the policy position I advocate. So called smart money has been taking a pound of flesh from retail constantly. The front run the order flow to take a skim. The pump up penny stocks to start momentum and then crash it when retail jumps in. They do all this simply be virtue of having more capital, more leverage, and more information. For once, due to a confluence of unique situations, they turned the tables and succeeded. They did this through hard work and smart analysis. The idiots should be praised not villified.

And seriously, may a thousand perils rain down upon you for comparing them to seditionist traitors. I dont care how much money you are loosing. That's not cool.

Haha I don't have a dime in this. Your thousand perils missed. And way to go, you're shorting the market, just like the big boys. You're just mad they have more $$, not that they do anything wrong.

I'm not mad about anything. I do what I do and I do it well. I just don't take kindly to your lies and distortions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l9cz1k/for_everyone_that_just_joined_because_of_gme_and/

This is exactly why WSB is going to ruin a lot of individuals who get suckered into a ponzi scheme. Tiny disclaimer at the bottom does not absolve them of guilt.

Regular people will go bankrupt listening to this. Meanwhile Melvin Capital will have a bad year, and then they will keep on managing a hedge fund until they retire.

If this frenzy is artificially popped by tilting the scales even further in favor of the hedge funds then the people you are concerned about will get hurt worse. We have to let this play out naturally. Those risks are forseeable. The risks of popping this artificially are not.

No, those people will get hurt by the same amount. There will be fewer winners in the ponzi scheme though.

And frankly there is no "scales tipping" going on. If you are butthurt about Thursday, get a bigger and better broker. Honestly you can't expect to take on the seventh fleet from a speedboat with a machine gun on it. Talk about how a little company like Robin Hood somehow rigged the system is a conspiracy theory. And ultimately the SEC will write a report that says they were in danger of going below their required capital ratios. WSB will, like good conspiracy theorists, claim that this is proof that "THE CONSPIRACY GOES EVEN DEEPER".

The WSB instructions on Thursday were to hold. And RH never restricted holding. WSB was mad that people might sell what they freely own. Think about that.

Ultimately the WSB plan will fall apart because they aren't a unified syndicate with pooled profits, and when profit taking comes, it's every man for himself. There will be no settlement day where the people who got in at $300 or $400 get money. You could already be suckered. For all you know, some of the paper multimillionaires may have already hedged their positions. If you are relying on their portfolio screenshots to tell the truth, good luck with that. The guy who started this never intended to launch a crusade to destroy short selling. Why would you expect him to take up the cause now? Fear that his life will be threatened if he does, maybe. It is rational to expect that he is looking out or his family right now. He's a renter who currently has $40M. and knows how to lock in those profits without showing his cards. Not saying he did, but why wouldn't he?

Most squeezes and market cornering efforts fail. Sometimes both sides go down the toilet. And those efforts are an individual or a small group of highly unified individuals. In this case you have thousands of people with indvidual motives. Those range from a $500 bet to "stick it to the man", to someone going all in to pay off college debt, to someone else who doesn't even understand what buying on margin means but sees a boat or a house in his future.

I have seen a few people describe them as "collateral damage". Hey, you aren't a bond villain. You're a person who must weigh the ethics of participating in this scheme based on misinformation, in the same way a member of Congress needs to weigh the ethics of challenging certification of the vote with an uneducated/delusional mob outside.

Wow, how deep in the hole are you? Because this is some hillarious paranoia. It'll be ok, you'll be fine. Cover your shorts and take your losses. You shouldn't be in the game if you can't handle the consequences.

If you must know. I do use multiple of those "real" brokerages. What's more the only position I have in GME are puts. That doesn't change the fundamental analysis of what happened or what will happen. It also doesn't change the policy position I advocate. So called smart money has been taking a pound of flesh from retail constantly. The front run the order flow to take a skim. The pump up penny stocks to start momentum and then crash it when retail jumps in. They do all this simply be virtue of having more capital, more leverage, and more information. For once, due to a confluence of unique situations, they turned the tables and succeeded. They did this through hard work and smart analysis. The idiots should be praised not villified.

And seriously, may a thousand perils rain down upon you for comparing them to seditionist traitors. I dont care how much money you are loosing. That's not cool.

Haha I don't have a dime in this. Your thousand perils missed. And way to go, you're shorting the market, just like the big boys. You're just mad they have more $$, not that they do anything wrong.

I'm not mad about anything. I do what I do and I do it well. I just don't take kindly to your lies and distortions.

I have told the truth for the sake of those who have been suckered into this ponzi scheme.

Glad you are good at speculating. It seems like an important contribution to the economy. /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l9cz1k/for_everyone_that_just_joined_because_of_gme_and/

This is exactly why WSB is going to ruin a lot of individuals who get suckered into a ponzi scheme. Tiny disclaimer at the bottom does not absolve them of guilt.

Regular people will go bankrupt listening to this. Meanwhile Melvin Capital will have a bad year, and then they will keep on managing a hedge fund until they retire.

If this frenzy is artificially popped by tilting the scales even further in favor of the hedge funds then the people you are concerned about will get hurt worse. We have to let this play out naturally. Those risks are forseeable. The risks of popping this artificially are not.

No, those people will get hurt by the same amount. There will be fewer winners in the ponzi scheme though.

And frankly there is no "scales tipping" going on. If you are butthurt about Thursday, get a bigger and better broker. Honestly you can't expect to take on the seventh fleet from a speedboat with a machine gun on it. Talk about how a little company like Robin Hood somehow rigged the system is a conspiracy theory. And ultimately the SEC will write a report that says they were in danger of going below their required capital ratios. WSB will, like good conspiracy theorists, claim that this is proof that "THE CONSPIRACY GOES EVEN DEEPER".

The WSB instructions on Thursday were to hold. And RH never restricted holding. WSB was mad that people might sell what they freely own. Think about that.

Ultimately the WSB plan will fall apart because they aren't a unified syndicate with pooled profits, and when profit taking comes, it's every man for himself. There will be no settlement day where the people who got in at $300 or $400 get money. You could already be suckered. For all you know, some of the paper multimillionaires may have already hedged their positions. If you are relying on their portfolio screenshots to tell the truth, good luck with that. The guy who started this never intended to launch a crusade to destroy short selling. Why would you expect him to take up the cause now? Fear that his life will be threatened if he does, maybe. It is rational to expect that he is looking out or his family right now. He's a renter who currently has $40M. and knows how to lock in those profits without showing his cards. Not saying he did, but why wouldn't he?

Most squeezes and market cornering efforts fail. Sometimes both sides go down the toilet. And those efforts are an individual or a small group of highly unified individuals. In this case you have thousands of people with indvidual motives. Those range from a $500 bet to "stick it to the man", to someone going all in to pay off college debt, to someone else who doesn't even understand what buying on margin means but sees a boat or a house in his future.

I have seen a few people describe them as "collateral damage". Hey, you aren't a bond villain. You're a person who must weigh the ethics of participating in this scheme based on misinformation, in the same way a member of Congress needs to weigh the ethics of challenging certification of the vote with an uneducated/delusional mob outside.

Wow, how deep in the hole are you? Because this is some hillarious paranoia. It'll be ok, you'll be fine. Cover your shorts and take your losses. You shouldn't be in the game if you can't handle the consequences.

If you must know. I do use multiple of those "real" brokerages. What's more the only position I have in GME are puts. That doesn't change the fundamental analysis of what happened or what will happen. It also doesn't change the policy position I advocate. So called smart money has been taking a pound of flesh from retail constantly. The front run the order flow to take a skim. The pump up penny stocks to start momentum and then crash it when retail jumps in. They do all this simply be virtue of having more capital, more leverage, and more information. For once, due to a confluence of unique situations, they turned the tables and succeeded. They did this through hard work and smart analysis. The idiots should be praised not villified.

And seriously, may a thousand perils rain down upon you for comparing them to seditionist traitors. I dont care how much money you are loosing. That's not cool.

Haha I don't have a dime in this. Your thousand perils missed. And way to go, you're shorting the market, just like the big boys. You're just mad they have more $$, not that they do anything wrong.

I'm not mad about anything. I do what I do and I do it well. I just don't take kindly to your lies and distortions.

For the last ten years, you could literally do nothing and do it well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tesla may be overvalued by assets and revenue for similar companies. But the value of it stock is determined by supply and demand. You are looking at the wrong thing. Yes it is overvalued by those metrics but if everyone wants it and does not care what they pay -- it will be higher. For years Berkshire Hathaway was under valued in terms of its break up value by at one point by more that $50 billion. That is not a stock market issue -- who is to say who has the right value. Stock market is willing sellers and buyers arriving at a price.

Stock market did go down with COVID. It came back for a few reasons: COVID has not been that bad for the economy for most people and certainly for most public companies; there is a lot of money that needs to go somewhere -- people have a lot to invest --- it has to go, and the fundamentals are quite good for the economy assuming we can get back to work.

You are wrong. When people's recklessness and idiocy endangers our nation, it is time for regulation. Look at 2008. Look at 1929. Look at 6 Jan. People need regulation. Very few people are libertarians and I strongly suspect most so-called liberatarians would hate if they actually got what they are asking for.

What would you regulate? What is the new regulation?

2008 regulation was foolish, not well thought out and did nothing real. Want that again? PR victory but that is all.

Whatever regulations Elizabeth Warren wants. She knows her stuff, and is for the common person.

You seem to be either a complete shill for EW or are a troll because it is pretty well known she knows little about how the financial system works.