First, you're replying to more than one person. The one you answered was not the one you said was "whining." And as far as supporting racism by voting for Trump, that's YOUR opinion. I don't think the man is racist. I just think he shoots from the hip and says obnoxious things. True, not a good trait for a president. (And given last week, I'm reconsidering my support, actually.) But OTOH, you are supporting (!!) public corruption and power-at-all-costs, and I don't think someone who is as corrupt as HRC is a good choice for a president, either. So, they're both horribly flawed. It comes down to which one's flaws are worse. |
| Hint: The worse one is the one who flies off the handle anytime someone looks at him sideways and will stop at nothing to get back. That's someone who is unfit to be president. |
I'm tending to agree with you, since as I mentioned above I'm rethinking my support for Trump. But it remains a matter of opinion - not fact - and I have not yet made a final decision. Lots of time to see how things play out....on both sides. |
| It's looking very safe to vote for Trump now! So if you don't like Clinton vote for Trump! |
| Trump's being heavily supported by the Russians. If this is OK with you, go right ahead. |
I think this thread may be the best troll I've seen here in months. |
Hello CLOWN! You are obviously not a woman or hispanic. Do some research on rape stats among hispanic or minority women then get back to me. |
Why did you respond as if you were the PP, then? And again, who is infringing upon your right to vote? That's your argument for why liberals aren't allowed to be harsh about your choice of candidate. Yes, it is my opinion that when you support Trump, you are supporting racism, sexism, and misogyny. And it's the opinion of a LOT of other people, including some very prominent Republicans. I'm glad you're rethinking your support for him. I am not choosing to support public corruption of any kind. There is no credible evidence of any public corruption with regard to Clinton. The only stuff you can cite is nonsense conspiracy crap. She has a foundation -- that's corruption? Somebody better tell George W Bush that, since he has one too. Emails? Puhleeze. My private information was hacked by the Chinese on a secure government server. Please excuse me if I'm unimpressed. And what else? She took money for speeches. SO HAS EVERYONE ELSE. But it's only a problem when it's the only woman with a serious shot at the presidency. Right. |
No one likes how fake the clintons are and no one with a brain believes the 2 are together and faithful to one another. Those with brain know hillary is ambitious and cutthroat. Everything she has done points to it. As for trump being racist, misogynistic, etc well so is everyone else! Especially liberals who oppress illegals and want to squeeze cheap labor out of them. People love that trump is not fake and doubt hillary because she deleted the emails as if she was hiding something. |
| Im a NP ^^ |
Here, have a sip of reality. It's a little bitter at first, but you'll get used to it. |
There was an interesting article in the NY Post about how Hillary will have to make some decisions about whether or not to have interns around should she win the presidency. Yeah, it’s the NY Post, but it is a real dilemma......Pretty sad, really.
http://nypost.com/2016/08/14/if-elected-will-hillary-let-bill-have-female-interns-again/ |
Oh you hilbots and your sarcasm and ignorance |
"Liberals who oppress illegals"? What? You mean like Trump who hires them for wages no one could live on? And seriously, you hate Hillary because she's "ambitious"? No shit! Everyone running for president is ambitious. No one minds when that person is male. And seriously, who gives a flip if they're faithful to each other. I suspect she probably is, but dude, they're old anyway. I doubt there's much going on. And I care a heck of a lot more about how she would run the country than what goes on in their bedroom. You conservatives are OBSESSED with other peoples' personal lives. I've never seen a presidential candidate as racist and misogynistic as Trump. Not even Pat Buchanan, and that's saying something. |
Oh look, namecalling. What a great point you made! Go back to worrying about interns and the sex lives of 70 year olds. The grownups will deal with governing. |