Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle Controversy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeans are the perfect mega product. She should really just start her own brand and sell Sweeney Jeanies And make a maga fortune. Can she get Trump to wear a pair and make jeans great again?

Make them pullups.

[Anonymous]

She should totally launch her own line of jeans!

American Blue Jeans

ABJ for short.

Better yet: American BJ

“Nobody does a better BJ than Sydney Sweeney.”

“Sydney Sweeney’s BJs are amazingly American!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

Maybe it was made just to piss off people like you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

Not very inclusive of non athletes or people who have physical limitations. Do they have bad genes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

Not very inclusive of non athletes or people who have physical limitations. Do they have bad genes?

No. The message is very simple that this pretty lady has good genes. It Is not a referendum on everyone in society. It must be exhausting to be Gen Z sitting around masturbating to your social superiority. Good lord.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

Maybe it was made just to piss off people like you?

And presumably sell jeans to people that like to piss off anti-magas. Some brand has to dress the magas and American eagle would like to be that brand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

Maybe it was made just to piss off people like you?

And presumably sell jeans to people that like to piss off anti-magas. Some brand has to dress the magas and American eagle would like to be that brand.

Go buy some FUBU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It feels like a pushback to the body positivity/body inclusivity movement we've been on. It feels like a throwback to the toxic hyper-sexualization of one type of beauty ideal of the 90s/early 2000s.

If you really wanted to extoll someone with "great genes," putting some GOAT athletes in the campaign would be more fitting.

I agree. Clearly the subtext is made to appeal to MAGA types. It's indisputable. Now I'm not going to judge the model, because maybe she didn't know she would be the only face of the campaign.

Maybe it was made just to piss off people like you?

And presumably sell jeans to people that like to piss off anti-magas. Some brand has to dress the magas and American eagle would like to be that brand.

American Eagle was around way before "MAGA" ever existed.

[Anonymous]

Ooh I sm going to burn Sydney Sweeney on Instagram. while masturbating about my superiority. The ultimate Gen Z intersection of social superiority and sexual interest in oneself because the can't put their smart phone down long enough to have sex with another person.