If you voted for Youngkin, what was the number one reason?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it fascinating that people voted for Youngkin because of this mysterious undefined "wokeness" that the right has convinced them of. Of course, you don't know what that means or how it would manifest itself.

You also discuss CRT, but don't know what that means either. None of these issues are happening in VA, but you bought it hook, line and sinker.

It's scary that you lack any critical thinking skills. Fox and Facebook are powerful things.

It's scary that you prefer to parrot the same talking points, over and over again. Especially in the face of numerous links that have been posted to the "anti-bias" curriculum implemented in FCPS, LCPS, and other school systems. "CRT" is merely shorthand. You know, like "Defund the Police."

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BTFRCZ6CA62E/$file/Final%20Anti-Racism%20Anti-Bias%20Curriculum%20Work%20Session%20Sept%2014%202020.pdf

LOL. You voted for Youngkin because some teachers took anti-bias training? You realize that has been around forever and is standard corporate training?

At Carlyle, it looks like Youngkin went WAY farther than that for D&I:
https://www.carlyle.com/impact/diverse-teams

You been had.

If you can't tell the difference between a private business and a public school at this point in your life, I don't think we can help you either.

It’s like the most basic “how to be a decent human” training.

How is it offensive in any way?

Answer noted as non-responsive.

Yup. Crickets.

It’s so benign. I don’t get it.

Is this also benign?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nupaP3IQwM

This woman is the perfect example of a vile racist. Who also desperately needs a stylist.

And that’s not anti-bias training. Or a VA teacher. Or relevant to what we were discussing.

You guys have zero substance. All frenzied fear, no facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was it education? taxes? you like the fleece?

In all seriousness, I'd like to hear (see) your answer.

Democrats will expand immigration and pass amnesty for 11 million causing a huge increase in immigration

"Coretta Scott King, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s wife, warned that "cheap labor" from increased immigration would devastate communities of color. Barbara Jordan, a pioneer in the Democratic Party and the first Southern Black woman elected to the House of Representatives, said it best: 'It is both a right and a responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so that it serves the national interest.'

"Considering that almost 5.4 million more Americans are unemployed than before the pandemic, it's absurd to argue that amnesty serves the national interest. Chuck Schumer might not recognize that. But hopefully, Sinema and Kelly do."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was it education? taxes? you like the fleece?

In all seriousness, I'd like to hear (see) your answer.

Democrats will expand immigration and pass amnesty for 11 million causing a huge increase in immigration

"Coretta Scott King, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s wife, warned that "cheap labor" from increased immigration would devastate communities of color. Barbara Jordan, a pioneer in the Democratic Party and the first Southern Black woman elected to the House of Representatives, said it best: 'It is both a right and a responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so that it serves the national interest.'

"Considering that almost 5.4 million more Americans are unemployed than before the pandemic, it's absurd to argue that amnesty serves the national interest. Chuck Schumer might not recognize that. But hopefully, Sinema and Kelly do."

I also am against the governor of Virginia giving amnesty to immigrants in Texas