American Riviera Orchard and Meghan Markle

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You haven’t said what kind of job.


DP - yes someone did. She could keep acting. But evidently she doesn't want to...........or can't get hired? 🤷‍♀️


Clearly she doesn't want to. You can only catch rare glimpses of her, if you are lucky. See the Duchess cooking in the kitchen, her hands arranging flowers, dancing in a black dress but the door is closing...that's all for now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


The Queen said Megan could keep her acting jobs. Megan no longer wanted to act.


Ah, I see. So if Meghan announced she was starring in a new television show, you would be totally fine with that and not complain about how she is embarrassing the royal family and trading on her title to hack her way back into acting, and wouldn't rip apart whatever the show was as unbecoming of someone who married a royal, etc.? You'd be like "okay that is fine, it is after all her chosen profession and she'd been doing it for a long time when she met Harry."

Somehow I don't think so.

I am not the biggest Meghan Markle fan but it's so obvious that some of you will hate her no matter what she does and won't be happy unless Harry divorces her, publicly states he made a mistake in marrying her, and then absconds with he children back to England to grovel to his family to take him back. It is really weird.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You haven’t said what kind of job.


DP - yes someone did. She could keep acting. But evidently she doesn't want to...........or can't get hired? 🤷‍♀️


Clearly she doesn't want to. You can only catch rare glimpses of her, if you are lucky. See the Duchess cooking in the kitchen, her hands arranging flowers, dancing in a black dress but the door is closing...that's all for now.


So lucky are we!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


The Queen said Megan could keep her acting jobs. Megan no longer wanted to act.


Ah, I see. So if Meghan announced she was starring in a new television show, you would be totally fine with that and not complain about how she is embarrassing the royal family and trading on her title to hack her way back into acting, and wouldn't rip apart whatever the show was as unbecoming of someone who married a royal, etc.? You'd be like "okay that is fine, it is after all her chosen profession and she'd been doing it for a long time when she met Harry."

Somehow I don't think so.

I am not the biggest Meghan Markle fan but it's so obvious that some of you will hate her no matter what she does and won't be happy unless Harry divorces her, publicly states he made a mistake in marrying her, and then absconds with he children back to England to grovel to his family to take him back. It is really weird.


You're wrong. Many people would love to see her acting again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


You know they do not want her to have any job or start any business ventures. What would really make them happy is if she is jobless, penniless, divorced, lose custody of her kids and living on the street.


Who is "they"?


The ominous “they” that forced Meghan to be described by a former boss as a “f’ing grifter,” the evil powers which forced Tom Bower to find impeccable sources calling her the nastiest, meanest person they’d met when doing a (prior cheaply made tacky shit) campaign for Reitmans (for all their litigiousness they haven’t found time to sue him over the past years), the terrible they forcing delicate Meghan to announce this imminent failure without benefit of products or good production values or even spell-checking “riviera” on the Instagram page initially. They have soooo much power, but not hashtag boss byyyitch power, unlike a certain uh creator.
Anonymous
So are they getting PR advice in their moves? I can't imagine that a good advisor would encourage their decision to name the brand "American Riviera Orchard"....its such a mouthful. And is the whole "launch with no products" part of their strategy? I totally buy how the whole beige California organic jellies thing can be a successful, but I don't understand why they are approaching it so haphazardly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


The Queen said Megan could keep her acting jobs. Megan no longer wanted to act.


Ah, I see. So if Meghan announced she was starring in a new television show, you would be totally fine with that and not complain about how she is embarrassing the royal family and trading on her title to hack her way back into acting, and wouldn't rip apart whatever the show was as unbecoming of someone who married a royal, etc.? You'd be like "okay that is fine, it is after all her chosen profession and she'd been doing it for a long time when she met Harry."

Somehow I don't think so.

I am not the biggest Meghan Markle fan but it's so obvious that some of you will hate her no matter what she does and won't be happy unless Harry divorces her, publicly states he made a mistake in marrying her, and then absconds with he children back to England to grovel to his family to take him back. It is really weird.


You're wrong. Many people would love to see her acting again.


William and Kate loved Suits!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


The Queen said Megan could keep her acting jobs. Megan no longer wanted to act.


Ah, I see. So if Meghan announced she was starring in a new television show, you would be totally fine with that and not complain about how she is embarrassing the royal family and trading on her title to hack her way back into acting, and wouldn't rip apart whatever the show was as unbecoming of someone who married a royal, etc.? You'd be like "okay that is fine, it is after all her chosen profession and she'd been doing it for a long time when she met Harry."

Somehow I don't think so.

I am not the biggest Meghan Markle fan but it's so obvious that some of you will hate her no matter what she does and won't be happy unless Harry divorces her, publicly states he made a mistake in marrying her, and then absconds with he children back to England to grovel to his family to take him back. It is really weird.


You're wrong. Many people would love to see her acting again.


Surely she could finance her own project then.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


You know they do not want her to have any job or start any business ventures. What would really make them happy is if she is jobless, penniless, divorced, lose custody of her kids and living on the street.


Who is "they"?


The ominous “they” that forced Meghan to be described by a former boss as a “f’ing grifter,” the evil powers which forced Tom Bower to find impeccable sources calling her the nastiest, meanest person they’d met when doing a (prior cheaply made tacky shit) campaign for Reitmans (for all their litigiousness they haven’t found time to sue him over the past years), the terrible they forcing delicate Meghan to announce this imminent failure without benefit of products or good production values or even spell-checking “riviera” on the Instagram page initially. They have soooo much power, but not hashtag boss byyyitch power, unlike a certain uh creator.


Why are you so worked up about this. Bill Simmons called her and Harry grifters. Okay, Bill Simmons is an obnoxious blowhard with a lot of wrong opinions, so I don't really care one way or another. Sounds like she was difficult on that one commercial, but she has a bunch of friends from her actual years on Suits who have nice things to say about her so she's probably not actually the meanest person in the history of mankind.

I don't assume Meghan is some kind of angel sent from heaven to save us -- she's probably a flawed person like any of us and has good moments and bad. But in the grand scheme of things, what has she ever done that would merit the amount of vitriol against her? She was demanding on a commercial set over a decade ago? Okay, better cancel literally 90% of Hollywood then. She had a deal to make podcasts and she underperformed? Oh no, that is very directly relevant to my life and absolutely justifies anger towards her.

I just don't get the hate. I don't get worship either, but I don't worship any celebrities so that never makes sense. But of all the people to just absolutely loathe, I don't understand how Meghan Markle, who frankly seems pretty middle of the road to me (and who I do think was treated pretty badly by both the royal family and the British press during her time there, whatever her other merits and demerits as a person) inspires so much outrage. She is launching some kind of lifestyle brand. Big whoop. Do you also hate Rachel Ray and Chrissy Teigan and Gwyneth Paltrow and Martha Stewart? Who cares?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


You know they do not want her to have any job or start any business ventures. What would really make them happy is if she is jobless, penniless, divorced, lose custody of her kids and living on the street.


Who is "they"?


The ominous “they” that forced Meghan to be described by a former boss as a “f’ing grifter,” the evil powers which forced Tom Bower to find impeccable sources calling her the nastiest, meanest person they’d met when doing a (prior cheaply made tacky shit) campaign for Reitmans (for all their litigiousness they haven’t found time to sue him over the past years), the terrible they forcing delicate Meghan to announce this imminent failure without benefit of products or good production values or even spell-checking “riviera” on the Instagram page initially. They have soooo much power, but not hashtag boss byyyitch power, unlike a certain uh creator.


Why are you so worked up about this. Bill Simmons called her and Harry grifters. Okay, Bill Simmons is an obnoxious blowhard with a lot of wrong opinions, so I don't really care one way or another. Sounds like she was difficult on that one commercial, but she has a bunch of friends from her actual years on Suits who have nice things to say about her so she's probably not actually the meanest person in the history of mankind.

I don't assume Meghan is some kind of angel sent from heaven to save us -- she's probably a flawed person like any of us and has good moments and bad. But in the grand scheme of things, what has she ever done that would merit the amount of vitriol against her? She was demanding on a commercial set over a decade ago? Okay, better cancel literally 90% of Hollywood then. She had a deal to make podcasts and she underperformed? Oh no, that is very directly relevant to my life and absolutely justifies anger towards her.

I just don't get the hate. I don't get worship either, but I don't worship any celebrities so that never makes sense. But of all the people to just absolutely loathe, I don't understand how Meghan Markle, who frankly seems pretty middle of the road to me (and who I do think was treated pretty badly by both the royal family and the British press during her time there, whatever her other merits and demerits as a person) inspires so much outrage. She is launching some kind of lifestyle brand. Big whoop. Do you also hate Rachel Ray and Chrissy Teigan and Gwyneth Paltrow and Martha Stewart? Who cares?


Its the victimization for me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


You know they do not want her to have any job or start any business ventures. What would really make them happy is if she is jobless, penniless, divorced, lose custody of her kids and living on the street.


Who is "they"?


The ominous “they” that forced Meghan to be described by a former boss as a “f’ing grifter,” the evil powers which forced Tom Bower to find impeccable sources calling her the nastiest, meanest person they’d met when doing a (prior cheaply made tacky shit) campaign for Reitmans (for all their litigiousness they haven’t found time to sue him over the past years), the terrible they forcing delicate Meghan to announce this imminent failure without benefit of products or good production values or even spell-checking “riviera” on the Instagram page initially. They have soooo much power, but not hashtag boss byyyitch power, unlike a certain uh creator.


Why are you so worked up about this. Bill Simmons called her and Harry grifters. Okay, Bill Simmons is an obnoxious blowhard with a lot of wrong opinions, so I don't really care one way or another. Sounds like she was difficult on that one commercial, but she has a bunch of friends from her actual years on Suits who have nice things to say about her so she's probably not actually the meanest person in the history of mankind.

I don't assume Meghan is some kind of angel sent from heaven to save us -- she's probably a flawed person like any of us and has good moments and bad. But in the grand scheme of things, what has she ever done that would merit the amount of vitriol against her? She was demanding on a commercial set over a decade ago? Okay, better cancel literally 90% of Hollywood then. She had a deal to make podcasts and she underperformed? Oh no, that is very directly relevant to my life and absolutely justifies anger towards her.

I just don't get the hate. I don't get worship either, but I don't worship any celebrities so that never makes sense. But of all the people to just absolutely loathe, I don't understand how Meghan Markle, who frankly seems pretty middle of the road to me (and who I do think was treated pretty badly by both the royal family and the British press during her time there, whatever her other merits and demerits as a person) inspires so much outrage. She is launching some kind of lifestyle brand. Big whoop. Do you also hate Rachel Ray and Chrissy Teigan and Gwyneth Paltrow and Martha Stewart? Who cares?


I agree, PP.

Thing is, you'd be hard pressed to find a MM worshiper on this board. Many of us (who are called sugars by the royal defenders) are like you--we are people who find the vitriol to be unjustified and bizarre and likely based on misinformation and jealousy.

We question it, and we call out the hypocrisy when we see it.

[DP]
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So are they getting PR advice in their moves? I can't imagine that a good advisor would encourage their decision to name the brand "American Riviera Orchard"....it's such a mouthful. And is the whole "launch with no products" part of their strategy? I totally buy how the whole beige California organic jellies thing can be a successful, but I don't understand why they are approaching it so haphazardly.


The PR strategy here makes sense to me. They are gauging interest and building a subscriber list, both things that will be essential/important for working with distributors or getting investors if necessary. It is much easier to go into a meeting with Nordstrom or Target or Sur le Table, or whoever their target is, and say "look we posted a video and a logo and had a half million followers within a few days." That's a decent debut and could get them through to the next stage with a lot of companies. Anecdotally, while I didn't follow this account, 10 of the 200 people I follow on Instagram did, and only one of them (the National Gallery of Art) is an institutional account -- the rest are friends and family members who were interested enough to follow.

Likely the reason there are not products yet is that they are still selling the concept and want to develop them in collaboration with their vendor. It's not clear to me yet if they are actually going upscale, or are doing the Martha-at-Target route of selling "upscale" downmarket. Both can be profitable and both could work with Meghan's profile. So one thing they might doing is looking at demos on their follows/subscribers to see where interest lies.

I agree the name is bad but also they have a horrible track record on this. I am mostly grateful they didn't try to turn Lillebet's name into a pun!
Anonymous
A girl has gotta eat, so I guess selling empty nonsense to fools easily parted from their money is pretty harmless. But anyone else find the name or the enterprise a pretty nonsensical lifestyle branding word salad?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


The Queen said Megan could keep her acting jobs. Megan no longer wanted to act.


Ah, I see. So if Meghan announced she was starring in a new television show, you would be totally fine with that and not complain about how she is embarrassing the royal family and trading on her title to hack her way back into acting, and wouldn't rip apart whatever the show was as unbecoming of someone who married a royal, etc.? You'd be like "okay that is fine, it is after all her chosen profession and she'd been doing it for a long time when she met Harry."

Somehow I don't think so.

I am not the biggest Meghan Markle fan but it's so obvious that some of you will hate her no matter what she does and won't be happy unless Harry divorces her, publicly states he made a mistake in marrying her, and then absconds with he children back to England to grovel to his family to take him back. It is really weird.


You're wrong. Many people would love to see her acting again.


William and Kate loved Suits!


The only conspiracy theory I will buy is that Suits didn’t exist until after she was married to Harry. I had never heard of it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Queen, Prince Philip and the Queen Mother are all rolling in their graves.


Why? The Queen sold gin. Charles had cookies and a guest house in Romania. The Queen and Prince Phillip gave out Royal Warrants. The QM may have done this too. If Peter’s milk commercials, Zara’s CBD ventures, and her husband’s podcasts and reality show participation, and the Buckingham Palace Gift Shop didn’t set off any rolling, this business venture probably won’t either.


The difference is the Queen and Charles did that stuff for charity. Megan is hawking stuff to line her own pockets


Just curious. What kind of job will you allow Megan to have to make money for her family? Maybe you should share what kind of jobs you would allow her to have without criticizing her.


The Queen said Megan could keep her acting jobs. Megan no longer wanted to act.


Ah, I see. So if Meghan announced she was starring in a new television show, you would be totally fine with that and not complain about how she is embarrassing the royal family and trading on her title to hack her way back into acting, and wouldn't rip apart whatever the show was as unbecoming of someone who married a royal, etc.? You'd be like "okay that is fine, it is after all her chosen profession and she'd been doing it for a long time when she met Harry."

Somehow I don't think so.

I am not the biggest Meghan Markle fan but it's so obvious that some of you will hate her no matter what she does and won't be happy unless Harry divorces her, publicly states he made a mistake in marrying her, and then absconds with he children back to England to grovel to his family to take him back. It is really weird.


You're wrong. Many people would love to see her acting again.


Surely she could finance her own project then.


If Reese Witherspoon can, why not? I truly think Meghan is missing out by not returning to tv drama. Perhaps she has a knack for comedy, too. She would not be the first woman to return to the work she left to marry and start a family. People would respect her for that.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: