Paul Manafort Told to Surrender

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fail to see how a few grubby soulless swamp creatures being taken down required a special counsel investigation masquerading as a Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Why didn't the FBI-AG take down these schmucks years ago? Why didn't the FBI-AG take down 1,000+ just like them over the last 20 years?

I'm glad to see a few ounces of muck are drained from the swamp, but the exaggerated reaction to this is phony as hell.

This

Bob Mueller was appointed by Rosenstein under enormous pressure from the democrats to look into 2016 election. Where was the FBI when the actual money laundering happened. This is getting ridiculous. Why do we need a special counsel, costing taxpayers millions to do the job that FBI should be doing in the first place.

Where was the Trump campaign when foreign nationals were trying to conspire with them? They should have reported that to the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:now NBC is claiming via leaks that Podesta group and mercury are company a and B.

Wasn't manafort working for podesta during that timeperiod?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort

Well isn't THAT fun for liberals!

\
Liberal here. Don't give a rat's ass about Podesta. And no other liberals seem to. Put that in your pipe.

Trump supporter here. Don’t give a rat’s ass about Manafort, Flynn, Page or any of those career political consultants. If Mueller wants to be viewed as fair and non partisan, he must investigate Obama administration’s handling of Russian uranium deal and Fusion GPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fail to see how a few grubby soulless swamp creatures being taken down required a special counsel investigation masquerading as a Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Why didn't the FBI-AG take down these schmucks years ago? Why didn't the FBI-AG take down 1,000+ just like them over the last 20 years?

I'm glad to see a few ounces of muck are drained from the swamp, but the exaggerated reaction to this is phony as hell.

This

Bob Mueller was appointed by Rosenstein under enormous pressure from the democrats to look into 2016 election. Where was the FBI when the actual money laundering happened. This is getting ridiculous. Why do we need a special counsel, costing taxpayers millions to do the job that FBI should be doing in the first place.

Where was the Trump campaign when foreign nationals were trying to conspire with them? They should have reported that to the FBI.

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:now NBC is claiming via leaks that Podesta group and mercury are company a and B.

Wasn't manafort working for podesta during that timeperiod?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort

Well isn't THAT fun for liberals!

\
Liberal here. Don't give a rat's ass about Podesta. And no other liberals seem to. Put that in your pipe.

Trump supporter here. Don’t give a rat’s ass about Manafort, Flynn, Page or any of those career political consultants. If Mueller wants to be viewed as fair and non partisan, he must investigate Obama administration’s handling of Russian uranium deal and Fusion GPS.

I'm sorry that reality is unlikely to suit you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:now NBC is claiming via leaks that Podesta group and mercury are company a and B.

Wasn't manafort working for podesta during that timeperiod?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort

Well isn't THAT fun for liberals!

\
Liberal here. Don't give a rat's ass about Podesta. And no other liberals seem to. Put that in your pipe.

Trump supporter here. Don’t give a rat’s ass about Manafort, Flynn, Page or any of those career political consultants. If Mueller wants to be viewed as fair and non partisan, he must investigate Obama administration’s handling of Russian uranium deal and Fusion GPS.

For what? What is the crime?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:now NBC is claiming via leaks that Podesta group and mercury are company a and B.

Wasn't manafort working for podesta during that timeperiod?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/sources-podesta-group-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/357884-podesta-group-is-one-of-the-companies-mentioned-in-manafort

Well isn't THAT fun for liberals!

\
Liberal here. Don't give a rat's ass about Podesta. And no other liberals seem to. Put that in your pipe.

Trump supporter here. Don’t give a rat’s ass about Manafort, Flynn, Page or any of those career political consultants. If Mueller wants to be viewed as fair and non partisan, he must investigate Obama administration’s handling of Russian uranium deal and Fusion GPS.

+1,000,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

And why did he take the position unpaid? Why do you think that is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I fail to see how a few grubby soulless swamp creatures being taken down required a special counsel investigation masquerading as a Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Why didn't the FBI-AG take down these schmucks years ago? Why didn't the FBI-AG take down 1,000+ just like them over the last 20 years?

I'm glad to see a few ounces of muck are drained from the swamp, but the exaggerated reaction to this is phony as hell.

This

Bob Mueller was appointed by Rosenstein under enormous pressure from the democrats to look into 2016 election. Where was the FBI when the actual money laundering happened. This is getting ridiculous. Why do we need a special counsel, costing taxpayers millions to do the job that FBI should be doing in the first place.

LOL

Ok, so this IS the Kremlin talking point. So what you are saying is that it's upsetting to you that Trump associated himself with money launderers, and Mueller should've saved him from himself a long time ago, even if he had no inkling of a crime being committed.

Y'all sound like idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

I know it's tough to admit that Mueller has actual proof of collusion. It's hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

And why did he take the position unpaid? Why do you think that is?

Lol Trump was so cheap and so broke that he didn't pay anyone, not even Manafort, his campaign manager.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

Do you know the difference between dealing with a hostile foreign government and hiring a foreign private firm from a friendly country? How stupid do you think we are, PP? Shame on you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

And why did he take the position unpaid? Why do you think that is?

What I am learning from Trumpkins today is that it's ok to commit a crime, as long as I am not paid for it. Excellent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is what Papadopolous did not collusion?

It is.

So Fusion GPS was doing opp research, and this guy was colluding? One had a budget of 11 million dollars, the other is an unpaid volunteer.

And why did he take the position unpaid? Why do you think that is?

Lol Trump was so cheap and so broke that he didn't pay anyone, not even Manafort, his campaign manager.

Because they just had sooooo much faith that Donald would truly MAGA! They didn't need a cent, it was all in the pure goodness their hearts to work for the campaign, dontchaknow.