FCPS Boundary Review Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

It’s bizarre to do county-wide redistricting based on capacity when their facilities planning is so obviously awful. We’re going to move kids around all over the county because Facilities and the School Board keep spending hundreds of millions of dollars based on ann outdated queue they came up with over 15 years ago?

They ought to tackle that challenge and start investing where it’s actually needed before they start moving kids around to cover up their own mistakes.

Yes they listed the option of creating trailers and also projected a decline in certain areas where they are over capacity. The Metro in Tysons created one problem and the construction off 28 the other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Those stuck-up Langley folks really don’t like poor brown kids.

Your comment isn't witty or funny. Pretty classless, honestly. Parents not wanting their kids to be moved to a lower performing school is in no way a sign of racism. Whether the move is deemed logical or necessary in the end, it is perfectly reasonable for good, non-racist people to have the desire for their children to stay at (or be moved to) the better performing school.

You are throwing insults just because you aren't smart enough to make a post that actually contributes to the conversation.

Truth hurts. Schools don’t “perform.” Kids do.

There are plenty of high performing kids at Herndon, but Langley parents don’t want their kids around poor brown kids, even if it would shorten their bus rides.

7 creates an artificial geographic boundary between neighborhoods. Langley servers all side streets on one part and Herndon on the other part. The Langley buses already come down Georgetown Pike whereas the Herndon buses need to go out of their way to get to Georgetown Pike.

And Langley is on Georgetown Pike. People also work either in DC or Tysons which makes Langley convenient.

Both schools are under capacity - so why start a race war?

The first paragraph is factually incorrect. There are a number of areas on the “Herndon” side of Route 7 in Herndon, Reston, and Vienna that currently go to Langley.

Moving these or other areas to Herndon or other schools wouldn’t start a race war, unless you assume the Langley parents would launch one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

Maybe I’m not following you, but your post seems to attempt to make One Fairfax out to be a SES policy, rather than a racial equity policy. I get why you would want to make that argument, but it just isn’t accurate, if that is what you are trying to do.

If the boundary changes have always been about capacity, please inform us why the BRAC contains many special interest groups, including race-based special interest groups.

And can you also let us know why Mateo Dunne at the publicly-available October 8, 2024 meeting, around 4:02 indicated that he wanted the chief equity officer on certain committees because “One Fairfax”?

You all keep asserting that this isn’t equity-based redistricting and then we provide you with our receipts to show that it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question, what can we do to get rid of this school board? I didn't vote them in but I'd sure like to vote them out. The fact that the goal of this boundary review is equity is reason enough. The think they have license to do what they want to suit the hyper liberal values of a segment of the population and it's just wrong. If the boundary review was just about sensible redistricting to avoid attendance islands and the like it would be a different story.

Again not a "fact"!

It is a fact--did you attend the meetings and read their materials? I did. This was explicitly stated.

Didn't see it on any slides - can you show where they have it in writing?

I didn't keep it but it was on the handout that stated the goals of the review. It was the first sentence and the 'equity' or 'equitable access' was in the sentence. When I read that, there was no question in my mind what this was all about and I think everyone should be very afraid, unless we think the SB is going to think twice about this agenda given the way things are going with the new administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Serious question, what can we do to get rid of this school board? I didn't vote them in but I'd sure like to vote them out. The fact that the goal of this boundary review is equity is reason enough. The think they have license to do what they want to suit the hyper liberal values of a segment of the population and it's just wrong. If the boundary review was just about sensible redistricting to avoid attendance islands and the like it would be a different story.

The term expires December 31, 2027 so you can vote late 2027. By then, they will have pushed through this boundary change and it will be too late to unravel all of this work. Plus, the county will still reelect a largely Democrat (if not all Democrat) school board that will not be motivated to make any drastic changes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

Maybe I’m not following you, but your post seems to attempt to make One Fairfax out to be a SES policy, rather than a racial equity policy. I get why you would want to make that argument, but it just isn’t accurate, if that is what you are trying to do.

If the boundary changes have always been about capacity, please inform us why the BRAC contains many special interest groups, including race-based special interest groups.

And can you also let us know why Mateo Dunne at the publicly-available October 8, 2024 meeting, around 4:02 indicated that he wanted the chief equity officer on certain committees because “One Fairfax”?

You all keep asserting that this isn’t equity-based redistricting and then we provide you with our receipts to show that it is.

Your receipts are - interest groups and a chief equity officer are present. This is circumstantial and not proof - they are there so no future complaints cannot be made such as: what you are implying. I'm looking for a document or meeting minutes that says that the boundary adjustment is about equity and not capacity. So far the meeting slides keep talking about capacity. And I hear the other side repeatedly say it's all about equity. Which is it? Show me the slides or meeting minutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question, what can we do to get rid of this school board? I didn't vote them in but I'd sure like to vote them out. The fact that the goal of this boundary review is equity is reason enough. The think they have license to do what they want to suit the hyper liberal values of a segment of the population and it's just wrong. If the boundary review was just about sensible redistricting to avoid attendance islands and the like it would be a different story.

The term expires December 31, 2027 so you can vote late 2027. By then, they will have pushed through this boundary change and it will be too late to unravel all of this work. Plus, the county will still reelect a largely Democrat (if not all Democrat) school board that will not be motivated to make any drastic changes.

So...there's nothing that anyone can do to stop them?

As far as reelecting Democrat, I will not. I am not conservative but this issue is a big one for me and I find it very problematic that the SB is so far to the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

Maybe I’m not following you, but your post seems to attempt to make One Fairfax out to be a SES policy, rather than a racial equity policy. I get why you would want to make that argument, but it just isn’t accurate, if that is what you are trying to do.

If the boundary changes have always been about capacity, please inform us why the BRAC contains many special interest groups, including race-based special interest groups.

And can you also let us know why Mateo Dunne at the publicly-available October 8, 2024 meeting, around 4:02 indicated that he wanted the chief equity officer on certain committees because “One Fairfax”?

You all keep asserting that this isn’t equity-based redistricting and then we provide you with our receipts to show that it is.

Your receipts are - interest groups and a chief equity officer are present. This is circumstantial and not proof - they are there so no future complaints cannot be made such as: what you are implying. I'm looking for a document or meeting minutes that says that the boundary adjustment is about equity and not capacity. So far the meeting slides keep talking about capacity. And I hear the other side repeatedly say it's all about equity. Which is it? Show me the slides or meeting minutes.

Why does it have to be proven to you. You were there, you saw the slides. If you don't remember that equity was a chief goal in this, that is your problem, not ours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question, what can we do to get rid of this school board? I didn't vote them in but I'd sure like to vote them out. The fact that the goal of this boundary review is equity is reason enough. The think they have license to do what they want to suit the hyper liberal values of a segment of the population and it's just wrong. If the boundary review was just about sensible redistricting to avoid attendance islands and the like it would be a different story.

Again not a "fact"!

It is a fact--did you attend the meetings and read their materials? I did. This was explicitly stated.

Didn't see it on any slides - can you show where they have it in writing?

I didn't keep it but it was on the handout that stated the goals of the review. It was the first sentence and the 'equity' or 'equitable access' was in the sentence. When I read that, there was no question in my mind what this was all about and I think everyone should be very afraid, unless we think the SB is going to think twice about this agenda given the way things are going with the new administration.

Ok. I follow you. I read that as one school doesn't get an advantage with facilities. Take a look at Herndon Middle and Hughes Middle they are completely different. I went to Herndon Intermediate and right now Hughes is looking a lot better. There are more people in Reston willing to complain then the minority in Herndon. I read "equitable access" to mean we wont have that discrepancy. Which I am 100% fully behind. HMS should look stellar like Hughes Middle and they are a few streets away from each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

Maybe I’m not following you, but your post seems to attempt to make One Fairfax out to be a SES policy, rather than a racial equity policy. I get why you would want to make that argument, but it just isn’t accurate, if that is what you are trying to do.

If the boundary changes have always been about capacity, please inform us why the BRAC contains many special interest groups, including race-based special interest groups.

And can you also let us know why Mateo Dunne at the publicly-available October 8, 2024 meeting, around 4:02 indicated that he wanted the chief equity officer on certain committees because “One Fairfax”?

You all keep asserting that this isn’t equity-based redistricting and then we provide you with our receipts to show that it is.

Your receipts are - interest groups and a chief equity officer are present. This is circumstantial and not proof - they are there so no future complaints cannot be made such as: what you are implying. I'm looking for a document or meeting minutes that says that the boundary adjustment is about equity and not capacity. So far the meeting slides keep talking about capacity. And I hear the other side repeatedly say it's all about equity. Which is it? Show me the slides or meeting minutes.

Circumstantial and not proof? Wtf are you talking about? Look at policy 8130. At some point it’s less about you not seeing the evidence and more about you not wanting to believe it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Those stuck-up Langley folks really don’t like poor brown kids.

Your comment isn't witty or funny. Pretty classless, honestly. Parents not wanting their kids to be moved to a lower performing school is in no way a sign of racism. Whether the move is deemed logical or necessary in the end, it is perfectly reasonable for good, non-racist people to have the desire for their children to stay at (or be moved to) the better performing school.

You are throwing insults just because you aren't smart enough to make a post that actually contributes to the conversation.

Truth hurts. Schools don’t “perform.” Kids do.

There are plenty of high performing kids at Herndon, but Langley parents don’t want their kids around poor brown kids, even if it would shorten their bus rides.

7 creates an artificial geographic boundary between neighborhoods. Langley servers all side streets on one part and Herndon on the other part. The Langley buses already come down Georgetown Pike whereas the Herndon buses need to go out of their way to get to Georgetown Pike.

And Langley is on Georgetown Pike. People also work either in DC or Tysons which makes Langley convenient.

Both schools are under capacity - so why start a race war?

The first paragraph is factually incorrect. There are a number of areas on the “Herndon” side of Route 7 in Herndon, Reston, and Vienna that currently go to Langley.

Moving these or other areas to Herndon or other schools wouldn’t start a race war, unless you assume the Langley parents would launch one.

I'm talking about the boundary between Langley and Herndon and nope no Langley bus goes past 7 on Georgetown Pike. Move some (or a lot of) Herndon kids to Langley. Wouldn't that solve everyone's problems? Then I don't care - my commute and routine is in-tact. You can start a race war somewhere else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Those Blue principals have wreaked havoc on FCPS. And now you see the two-faced nature of Blue voters. As long as their kids weren't impacted they were fine, but now that their kids may have to go to the heavily impacted schools they are freaking out.

I don't think that's accurate. Most of the voters are blue across the county and across pyramids. Presumably parents in all the areas that saw their high schools shift from well/high-performing to mediocre or low-performing over the past several decades are happy. After all, they are the ones that increasingly eliminated republican politicians from the school board. It must be that they were getting benefits from other changes driven by the mindset/philosophy of the democrats. No person or party is perfect so the tradeoffs must have been worth it.

Maybe it really is just the (democrat-voting) parents in the well/high-performing pyramids that remain that are especially hypocritical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

Maybe I’m not following you, but your post seems to attempt to make One Fairfax out to be a SES policy, rather than a racial equity policy. I get why you would want to make that argument, but it just isn’t accurate, if that is what you are trying to do.

If the boundary changes have always been about capacity, please inform us why the BRAC contains many special interest groups, including race-based special interest groups.

And can you also let us know why Mateo Dunne at the publicly-available October 8, 2024 meeting, around 4:02 indicated that he wanted the chief equity officer on certain committees because “One Fairfax”?

You all keep asserting that this isn’t equity-based redistricting and then we provide you with our receipts to show that it is.

Your receipts are - interest groups and a chief equity officer are present. This is circumstantial and not proof - they are there so no future complaints cannot be made such as: what you are implying. I'm looking for a document or meeting minutes that says that the boundary adjustment is about equity and not capacity. So far the meeting slides keep talking about capacity. And I hear the other side repeatedly say it's all about equity. Which is it? Show me the slides or meeting minutes.

Circumstantial and not proof? Wtf are you talking about? Look at policy 8130. At some point it’s less about you not seeing the evidence and more about you not wanting to believe it.

https://www.fcps.edu/facilities-planning-future/school-boundary-adjustments/boundary-policy

None of the bullet points state Equity. One sentence on: abides by One Fairfax which says every kid has the same equitable access and not one of the primary goals of rezoning.

The review of the boundary policy was initiated because of the following issues:

Overcrowding at several schools
Recognition that the current level of bond funding is not sufficient to address capacity demands, renovations (currently a 37-year cycle) and major maintenance in a timely manner
Reliance on trailers (over 750)
Planned growth in specific areas of the county
Demand for additional pre-k classrooms
The current boundary policy has not had a comprehensive review since its 1986 adoption. The county and the school system were significantly smaller at that time.

Tell me what are you reading? I don't see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

https://youtu.be/iM4AfGQqTWE?si=hwRTnBGDPN2HSoML&t=90

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at the leaked map information posted on previous thread - what do people think are the chances of entire Wakefield Elementary School getting 5zoned to Poe and Annandale?

This is not on the BRAC agenda. Someone is screwing with you. There are no pre-planned maps. DCUM is good for fake news and angry Republicans. Don't take the bait.

Hate to inform you--but Democrats also want their kids to stay in their present schools.

I think that's what he's in-line with. The Republicans keep bringing up the DEI card as a motivation for rezoning and make that a plan to turn Fairfax Red. Langley/Herndon is an easy fire for them to light.

It's just bus routes and capacity.

It's documented that the Democrat-run school board began planning a county-wide boundary review/redraw due to the commitment to One Fairfax. The point of redoing Policy 8130 was to put a "One Fairfax Lens" on the way boundaries are drawn. "Equity" is at the center of this and it is unreasonable that the Democrats don't stand behind this principle. It is also wild that in a majority blue county anyone would think that the politicians acting according to their party's principles would make the people that voted for them because they are democrats change their votes to republican.

Here is the example - of the DEI card; This is the worse way to mix rich + poor kids is to bus them across county especially with Fairfax traffic. Please show your sources where the Dems explicitly stated that they are redistricting to mix rich + poor kids. Or is it one of those "they wont say that's what they are doing"?

The boundary rezoning has always been with capacity https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/more-space-for-fcps-students-policy-8130-for-redistricting-under-consideration/article_5e5f73fc-6634-11ef-9af9-b707b04d85e1.html The lone DEI officer is to maintain that one school isn't left behind somehow.

Maybe I’m not following you, but your post seems to attempt to make One Fairfax out to be a SES policy, rather than a racial equity policy. I get why you would want to make that argument, but it just isn’t accurate, if that is what you are trying to do.

If the boundary changes have always been about capacity, please inform us why the BRAC contains many special interest groups, including race-based special interest groups.

And can you also let us know why Mateo Dunne at the publicly-available October 8, 2024 meeting, around 4:02 indicated that he wanted the chief equity officer on certain committees because “One Fairfax”?

You all keep asserting that this isn’t equity-based redistricting and then we provide you with our receipts to show that it is.

Your receipts are - interest groups and a chief equity officer are present. This is circumstantial and not proof - they are there so no future complaints cannot be made such as: what you are implying. I'm looking for a document or meeting minutes that says that the boundary adjustment is about equity and not capacity. So far the meeting slides keep talking about capacity. And I hear the other side repeatedly say it's all about equity. Which is it? Show me the slides or meeting minutes.

Circumstantial and not proof? Wtf are you talking about? Look at policy 8130. At some point it’s less about you not seeing the evidence and more about you not wanting to believe it.

Items not in 8130: equity, race, or one fairfax.

Items in 8130: access to programming, proximity, capacity, transportation, minimizing disruption, minimizing transportation costs, aligning pyramids and eliminating split feeders, and supporting family involvement.

So, yes, I agree with what you said. “At some point it’s less about you not seeing evidence and more about you not wanting to believe it.”