Recommend a nature focused trip for family that doesn't care for nature.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
When we went to Jackson, Tetons and Yellowstone, this is what we did that was not lining —
Tetons science school animal viewing Horseback riding in park White water rafting in Jackson Rock climbing park in Jackson Western shootout show in Jackson Junior ranger science badge stuff in Yellowstone. We also bought one of those those thermometer guns you point at the ground and it tells you how hot tj grojnd was. Alpine coaster at snow long resort Pools at hotel in Jackson Some of this stuff was especially cool because of the scenery so if that doesn’t spark joy for you, it might not be worth it. |
Anonymous
PP here. My family has actually been there. It was really like that. The Smokies are gorgeous though. |
Anonymous
OP here and this sounds pretty enticing |
Anonymous
|
It sounds like you aspire to being a different type of family than you are. That sounds performative.
I myself find nature to be beautiful, unpredictable and relaxing. If you don’t , then you probably won’t enjoy it. I hope you have not ruined it for your children too. If you want to try again, I would avoid camping, which can be hard for even the nature-drawn. Stay in a nice lodge in a national park (which must be booked far ahead). Go on ranger led activities—such as an evening campfire where you learn about bears or the park’s indigenous roots. Get active, such as rafting down a river that overlooks the Tetons, or exploring lava flows in Hawaii. But one or both if you need an attitude adjustment, because if you approach natural beauty with no sense of curiosity or awe, don’t bother. |
Anonymous
| After rafting in the grand Tetons and sightseeing in Yellowstone, my daughter enjoyed driving in a wagon train to a BBQ (with cowboys and Indians, on horseback). |
Anonymous
Why did you not like Iceland? What activities did you do while there? Was it a "point and shoot vacation" where you drive to a site see a view snap a picture move to next? I think most people who enjoy nature vacations enjoy the scenery, but also like physically active vacations. I love national park vacations because we get out and hike to see incredible views you can't see from the side of the road. I like the physical challenge of hiking and moving. I love ski vacation because I am physically moving and working on a skill. |
Anonymous
| We had an amazing time in Acadia National Park and Bar Harbor Maine. |
Anonymous
I'm a new poster, and I'll add Jackson Rodeo, Astoria Hot Springs (they have regular temp pools too) Dornans for pizza near the airport and amazing views, plus a super short trail to the river lined with wildflowers. The wildlife viewing in Yellowstone impressed my 13 year old who feels meh about nature generally. If any of you like birds, it was really cool to see species we don't have here and tons of hummingbirds. |
Anonymous
|
California? You can mix in the urban and cultural easily with stunning nature. Maybe drive btw SF and LA?
Northern Italy and Switzerland. Beautiful nature but also cultural. Croatian coast. Sicily Australia Japan - walk in bamboo forest and get right back to city by train |
Anonymous
|
you might want to look at Drowsy Water Ranch, IF your kids like horses even just enough (and you guys too). Our daughter was horse crazy at age 9, so we took a chance on a week at DWR even though we weren't riders. It was amazing--we had a two bedroom hotel room, but some families get their own cabins. Adults can zipline, hike, ride, golf, hot tub, swim. Kids go with their own age groups on rides, then hang out at the playground, fish, learn rodeo skills, campfires, etc. It was idyllic. Oh there was rafting too, not too hard at all. Evenings were campy square dancing, singing, etc. Met some amazing other families.
This past summer with old teens we went to Switzerland--Zurich, Luzern, and Wengen. Amazing. Ride the gondolas and trains around, take some short hikes, go see caves, rent ebikes in Lauterbrunnen--beautiful and decent food too. |
Anonymous
We enjoyed Iceland a lot. We did a walking tour of Reykjavik, visited some of their museums, ate good food, watched their NYE fireworks, toured the parks/waterfalls, etc, glacier tour, rode snowmobiles, searched for northern lights. We loved all the Reykjavik activities and enjoyed riding snowmobiles. The nature tours just didn't really move us but that may have been the point and shoot aspect of it |
Anonymous
|
When it comes to nature, I prefer it to be fairly “active” and immersive - moving through nature instead of just going to look at it. One of my favorite trips included “Norway in a nutshell” where you travel all accross the country via various methods of transit in one day.
I’ve also done hut-to-hut hikes in euorpe that were fun, though that is very much about the hiking. The nature was not very remote. Tour de mont blanc is one example, but there are others. Yosemite is really nice, but harder to get to and it gets very busy and crowded. I don’t know if I’d reccomend it for people who self-proclaim not to love nature. But basically any natinoal park will feel more lux and easy if you stay in a resort or nice lodge with on site ammenties. |
Anonymous
| Sedona or a dude ranch. |
Anonymous
| Really vote against a dude ranch (unless it's one with lots of other activities). We did one one year (at a place with some other activities, but not stuff like ziplining...they had fishing, yoga, hikes, mountain biking). It was fine, but not something I'd really recommend. If you aren't skilled horse people, you're really limited in what you can do, and most people who aren't riders don't really want to ride for hours a day for multiple days in a row. |
Anonymous
|
South Dakota - the Badlands, Wall Drug, the Black Hills, Custer State Park, Mt Rushmore, Wind and Jewel Caves.
Just watch out for the Sturgis Rally dates, when hundreds of thousands of motorcyclists descend. |