I don't understand. If you can make 5% yearly return on investment at low risk why wouldn't you? 5% of 4m investment is 200K, what is this 3% withdrawal rate BS? Do you have to let go of a concept that money can make money because you are retiring? You can live off your 5% and not touch the principal, which you can dig into for catastrophic things and leave the rest to your kids. Investments should keep up with the rate of inflation too, sure it's more work especially if different investment vehicles are used. If you did this while working ft job and raising kids before retirement why can't you do this after? |
|
You're not making a safe 5% return. You are making 5% minus some level of income tax at those numbers. So you really need approx an 8% return to have 5% to spend. |
+1. While I don't agree with you that you can get a 5% 'safe' return, most of these people are planning for a scenario where their nest egg will continue to grow even in retirement and not fully depleted at EOL. I think a 4% w/d assumes you won't run out of money 95% of the time. Of course, if you are able to catch the bond market at the bottom (highest possible yield), you could get that 5%+. A friend of mine literally locked down a 5.1% yield on 30-yr bond late last year on a big chunk of change. Unless rates rip higher, he's all set to receive that income for the rest of his life with potential for capital appreciation if rates trend a lot lower. |
| I don't know much about investment, but someone explain why do we always assume rate of return that area a bit too optimistic?Namely, is it impossible for example that return of 2% could the norm "one day"? |
|
Financial advisors say $4.3M for us to retire extremely safely around 47-49 years old, live on $160K ish (in today's dollars) and be very good until 95, with a substantial amount left.
My math says more like $3.5M since we don't have any college to fund, don't want to leave much behind, and don't have any family member that lived past 85. They agreed that is probably fine, but they are cautious. We've always spent a lot less than we earn so $160K to live on, adjust up over time for inflation, would be plenty. Their calculation also doesn't include any SS. I'm 40, so I think not including anything at all is overly cautious (but better than being reckless). |
That's dumb. There are several good ways to get at the 401k money before 59.5. If retiring "well before 59.5" indicates you value time over having a bigger nest egg, yoy absolutely should be counting your 401ks. |
|
Unsure what our # is because right now at 36 years old and 2 kids in activities, camps, orthodontics, tutors, etc etc it feels like $$$ flys out the door and it seems like there will never be enough.
We are just about 450k HHI. I can’t even imagine what will be enough. |
that"s your argument to the "need" to make/save EXTRA FOUR MILLION DOLLARS? How easy is it to retire with 8 mil vs. 4 mil? How easy is it to accumulate extra 4 mil as opposed to figuring out how to invest to get a return to give you clean 5%? IDK, maybe for you it's easy, but from the description of your lifestyle it doesn't sound like you are earning 7 figures or at least high 6 figures or are skilled at investing if you find it intimidating to get clean 5% return. None of this makes logical sense unless all of you are obsessing more about leaving millions to your kids and/or really up scaling and living large in retirement and are willing to work extra decade to enjoy luxury in your frailty you didn't even enjoy in your income earning years Of course you all love your jobs and working full time. |
160K per year before tax is likely to be about 10K/month net. IMO it's pretty tight in a high COL area even if your housing is paid off because you also will incur high health insurance expenses before you reach 65. Our modest home has constant tax hikes due to prices rising, we are paying 2x of what we paid when we bought. Any dwelling would be about 2-3K overhead costs (RE tax, insurance, utilities, repairs/maintenance, outsourcing of things you cannot do yourself), this goes for condos/TH too which have fees. Add health insurance and you are likely already spending 5K just to live without even eating or buying any necessities, which will be another 2K if you are thrifty. If you want to buy any big ticket items, like upgrade your furniture, car, remodel you need to dig into your savings. If you want to travel and do some dining/entertainment that's easily 2-3K a month for nothing extravagant at all. There goes your 10K. Not a terrible retirement, obviously, but it's not really free of financial strain in case of big ticket spend. It's a life where you will have to decide between taking that vacation or fixing your house, or buying a new car because yours broke down and foregoing all travel that year including seeing family airplane trip away. |
|
Help me understand how there’s many folks here are in their 40s and have > $5MM in retirement accounts. I am 44 (DW is 46, SAHM), making ~700K/year (only the last few years, prior to that was ~350k), and have a net worth of $3.1MM. Granted I only started putting money in 401k/brokerage starting 10 years ago (have now 700k in retirement/brokerage accounts).
How did everyone accelerate to >$5MM at this same age range? |
You are on target to have 5M by 50 |
|
PP again- oh I thought you said 3.1M in retirement- if that NW including house, you probably won’t get there.
I make 300k and have responded on this thread before but we are 5M in 50s. We’ve never had a fancy car and my husband is very handy. Two incomes helps a lot too as you can double 401k savings. |
It's not dumb - we have a few million in 401(k)s that I will convert to Roth over the next 20 years at a sub 15% tax rate. The $7M will allow me to live with a very low tax rate since the only income will be dividends and potentially some capital gains. We have substantial carry forward losses that will allow us to live more or less tax free, even with conversions, for the next couple years. I do not want to get stuck with a 72T distribution and I will retire before 55 so I can't touch that employer 401K without penalty until 59.5 |
You spend way too much damn money. We are 42 and I have been a SAHM for 16 years, since we were 26. DH started out making $165k (first year Big Law) but a few years later left that and has never made over $450k, and even that only recently. We have a NW over $4M not counting 529s that are fully funded and not counting the equity in our home (roughly $800k.) You are living too fancy a life to accumulate wealth at the rate that we are. Its simply arithmetic. |