2028 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Coppermine 2025 Black
Army
William & Mary
Howard
GW
Wofford
F&M
Denison
St Mary's (MD)
CNU
UMW

So stats don’t change. 0 top 20s, 0 ivies over past three years. Thanks for playing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

What an all time stretch. Wow … Can Lee Harvey Oswald be factored into this somehow? Hey - go with it. If it helps you get some sleep after seeing Capital’s stats, sweet dreams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let’s get back to how bad Cap Blue and Orange will be. Focus people

Maybe they will be bad but chances are they are getting recruited to better schools than the MD kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s get back to how bad Cap Blue and Orange will be. Focus people

Maybe they will be bad but chances are they are getting recruited to better schools than the MD kids.

The 28 class will not see the same recruiting success as the 25s because the uniform is where the similarities stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

What an all time stretch. Wow … Can Lee Harvey Oswald be factored into this somehow? Hey - go with it. If it helps you get some sleep after seeing Capital’s stats, sweet dreams.

Capital lives on it stats of getting girls on a team, but they don’t tell you what the price tag will be. You better be prepared to pay full price, especially the 27 and 28 parents.

Another stat you never see is whether the girls ever end up playing or if they stay at the bottom of the roster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s get back to how bad Cap Blue and Orange will be. Focus people

Maybe they will be bad but chances are they are getting recruited to better schools than the MD kids.

The 28 class will not see the same recruiting success as the 25s because the uniform is where the similarities stop.

Probably right - they’ll be closer to the 24s, which was ranked 15, and had better recruiting success than the 25s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

In addition to being athletic, wealthy, and smart, are they also very, very good looking? So sad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

What an all time stretch. Wow … Can Lee Harvey Oswald be factored into this somehow? Hey - go with it. If it helps you get some sleep after seeing Capital’s stats, sweet dreams.

Capital lives on it stats of getting girls on a team, but they don’t tell you what the price tag will be. You better be prepared to pay full price, especially the 27 and 28 parents.

Another stat you never see is whether the girls ever end up playing or if they stay at the bottom of the roster.

You're not giving the advice you think you're giving. Everybody knows that you have to play club fees.

And no. There are no official stats being kept on playing time for girls high school club lacrosse.

These are not groundbreaking revelations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

What an all time stretch. Wow … Can Lee Harvey Oswald be factored into this somehow? Hey - go with it. If it helps you get some sleep after seeing Capital’s stats, sweet dreams.

Capital lives on it stats of getting girls on a team, but they don’t tell you what the price tag will be. You better be prepared to pay full price, especially the 27 and 28 parents.

Another stat you never see is whether the girls ever end up playing or if they stay at the bottom of the roster.

My daughter played for Capital - every top 20 recruited player on her team (excluding ivies) received scholarship money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

Disagree. And please get help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

What an all time stretch. Wow … Can Lee Harvey Oswald be factored into this somehow? Hey - go with it. If it helps you get some sleep after seeing Capital’s stats, sweet dreams.

Don’t worry former pride and freshly chosen Capital dad. Your average DD will still get recruited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great summary DG. Thank you. Hero's and M&D also have fantastic recruiting results to be proud of. I assume Skywalkers also does very well. I was a little surprised to see that Capital generally had slightly higher T20 and Ivy numbers with generally lower ranked teams. Can someone explain to me the most likely reason for the disconnect? Is it simply more dedicated recruiting resources and effort at Capital? Or is it something about the girls unrelated to lacrosse, perhaps academic profile that opens different doors?

One big stat everyone overlooks and that is not published is the amount of money girls get to attend the school. If you can afford the full cost, schools are much more willing to add you to the roster. A roster full of commits, with no scholarship money is a deceiving stat for those who can’t afford $50,000 a year in tuition. Not many of the capital girls are getting a lot of money. Ivies don’t give any money, so that is more about deep pockets than lacrosse ability.

LMAO. Top 20 schools aren't just lopping people on to the roster. The Ivies are only going to be able to give admissions help to the number of recruits that make the roster. As close to 100% are going to need that help. That's the team they get, Ivy coaches aren't bringing in players because they can pay tuition. That's 1-2,000 pop D3 schools or lower D1.
Thanks for the laugh.

Disagree. With rosters around 38, the bottom half (19 girls) are likely there because their parents are paying full sticker price (many D.C. parents can afford to do this). They only had 12 scholarships to give out before this new ruling. Additionally, that bottom half likely has very good grades to keep the team GPA up. The top 19 are the real players. The rest are practice players with good grades and/or wealthy parents. Perfect profile for D.C. kids.

What an all time stretch. Wow … Can Lee Harvey Oswald be factored into this somehow? Hey - go with it. If it helps you get some sleep after seeing Capital’s stats, sweet dreams.

Don’t worry former pride and freshly chosen Capital dad. Your average DD will still get recruited.

Yes. Align yourself with the crazy conspiracy guy whose theories make no sense, including that the richest schools in world history need a couple of full pay lacrosse players.

[Anonymous]

I am a ‘30 parent and was intent on having my DD leave her team for an MD team but the Capital recruiting record is compelling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a ‘30 parent and was intent on having my DD leave her team for an MD team but the Capital recruiting record is compelling.

Move her to Maryland. Don’t waste the middle school years at stars and Pride. Come back to Capital if you want for High School.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a ‘30 parent and was intent on having my DD leave her team for an MD team but the Capital recruiting record is compelling.

Move her to Maryland. Don’t waste the middle school years at stars and Pride. Come back to Capital if you want for High School.

Making the top Capital team is not a sure thing and many or most players try to improve their chances by attending the pre-tryout clinics. This is expected for players on the DMV teams, so nobody is surprised when they show up. But when a player from a top MD team shows up at the clinics word gets out and this has the potential to create some drama. It becomes difficult to go all-in on the Capital tryout process while still maintaining good standing on the MD club. I’m not suggesting this never happens, but there are more complexities for a MD player than a DMV player. For a 2030 already on a top MD team it would be best to take the ride all the way to the end. If a player really wants to play for Capital in HS then staying on a (good) local team for MS is the best path.