Realignment for SEC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It concerns me that she might have to be asked to do something intolerable even for her.

Maybe, but that wouldn’t be my first guess as to what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Director of ENF just left. Looks like pushed not jumped.

If true, I don’t get the sense many people will be shedding tears.

I know many people didn’t love her but she was supportive of the enforcement program. Who knows what will come next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Director of ENF just left. Looks like pushed not jumped.

If true, I don’t get the sense many people will be shedding tears.

I know many people didn’t love her but she was supportive of the enforcement program. Who knows what will come next.

Good riddance! I hope a couple of other “directors” resign as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It concerns me that she might have to be asked to do something intolerable even for her.

Maybe, but that wouldn’t be my first guess as to what happened.

Indeed, she realized retirement was preferable to full-time RTO.

[Anonymous]

Let's see if PA can outdo himself and find someone even less qualified to replace her, or if he'll go with the acting approach for another 2.5 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Director of ENF just left. Looks like pushed not jumped.

If true, I don’t get the sense many people will be shedding tears.

I know many people didn’t love her but she was supportive of the enforcement program. Who knows what will come next.

Fair. All I can say is that I had very little direct dealings with her, but she did not seem reasonable in those dealings.

[Anonymous]

Maybe her ad hoc telework requests to be closer to her dog were denied.

[Anonymous]

Everyone should be thanking her. She led the Divisions directors in asking Atkins to give staff regular telework. She recognized how miserable people are and asked him to do something about it. The other Division directors followed her and asked as well.

Of course he’s not doing anything about it.

She didn’t ask for the job. Then she got here and was surrounded by miserable people who she sympathized with.

Who knows what ultimately made her decide to quit abruptly. But I don’t know how they find someone to run enforcement when they don’t really want them bringing anything but fraud cases. And the SEC has how many fraud cases per year? A handful, maybe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Director of ENF just left. Looks like pushed not jumped.

If true, I don’t get the sense many people will be shedding tears.

I know many people didn’t love her but she was supportive of the enforcement program. Who knows what will come next.

Good riddance! I hope a couple of other “directors” resign as well.

Couldn’t agree more. It’s not an impressive bunch. The exams guy is even less impressive than the judge and he was a GG holdover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Director of ENF just left. Looks like pushed not jumped.

If true, I don’t get the sense many people will be shedding tears.

I know many people didn’t love her but she was supportive of the enforcement program. Who knows what will come next.

Good riddance! I hope a couple of other “directors” resign as well.

Couldn’t agree more. It’s not an impressive bunch. The exams guy is even less impressive than the judge and he was a GG holdover.

I mean who wants to lead here right now.

[Anonymous]

she was nice to speak to. did not seem to know to much about securities laws though

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Director of ENF just left. Looks like pushed not jumped.

If true, I don’t get the sense many people will be shedding tears.

I know many people didn’t love her but she was supportive of the enforcement program. Who knows what will come next.

Good riddance! I hope a couple of other “directors” resign as well.

Couldn’t agree more. It’s not an impressive bunch. The exams guy is even less impressive than the judge and he was a GG holdover.

The exams guy is the most unqualified of the bunch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should be thanking her. She led the Divisions directors in asking Atkins to give staff regular telework. She recognized how miserable people are and asked him to do something about it. The other Division directors followed her and asked as well.

Of course he’s not doing anything about it.

She didn’t ask for the job. Then she got here and was surrounded by miserable people who she sympathized with.

Who knows what ultimately made her decide to quit abruptly. But I don’t know how they find someone to run enforcement when they don’t really want them bringing anything but fraud cases. And the SEC has how many fraud cases per year? A handful, maybe.

Thank her? This must’ve been happening deep behind the scenes because all the interactions with her are usually pretty terse. She really didn’t seem to care much about the staff at all anymore than PA. If she left, it’s probably cause she didn’t feel it was worth her time and she doesn’t need the money or the steppingstone.

[Anonymous]

I’m shocked that anyone would give up such a plum job. It’s a dream job. Almost as good those 6-month rulemaking details.

[Anonymous]

Maybe she’s moving to Homeland Security Secretary or CFTC commissioner?