Robert F Kennedy running for president as a Dem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, Woody Harrelson is donating and supporting RFK Jr.s campaign.

Maybe he has a chance?

Sure, sure. Just like Susan Sarandon got Bernie over the hump.

Nope. RFK Jr is a weaselly little Republican here to try and pull a Nader, Nader, Sanders/Stein.

[Anonymous]

More normal typical Democratic stuff

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kennedy will win the January 28, 2024 New Hampshire primary. Setting off a chain reaction of events similar to what happened to Lyndon Johnson.

RFK Jr will drop out before then.

Why should he?

Because his campaign is stupid and isn’t working. Democrats don’t support him and Republicans aren’t going to keep wasting money on him. The joke is over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More normal typical Democratic stuff

But he said earlier he supports abortion up until the fetus is viable outside of the mother. He was so unconcerned and busy cheating that he didn’t learn when a fetus is viable. He has one kid with his first wife and five by his second wife. I guess the heroin burned his brain.

[Anonymous]

News flash:
Many of you have “blended” families, as well.
Yes, any and all infidelity is unethical.
Do you really care?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More normal typical Democratic stuff

Hey GOP, please come pick up your unwanted spoiler candidate. He’s a perfect fit for your ratchet party and we don’t want him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More normal typical Democratic stuff

Hey GOP, please come pick up your unwanted spoiler candidate. He’s a perfect fit for your ratchet party and we don’t want him.

Nope, he’s all yours. Suck it.

[Anonymous]

Stop trying to make fetch happen, it’s not going to happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop trying to make fetch happen, it’s not going to happen.

Pure desperation. They're looking at the twice-impeached, thrice (so far) indicted convicted racist they're stuck with and trying to split the dems and independents with the RFK Jr. and "No Labels" astroturf nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More normal typical Democratic stuff

Hey GOP, please come pick up your unwanted spoiler candidate. He’s a perfect fit for your ratchet party and we don’t want him.

Nope, he’s all yours. Suck it.

?
He’s a Roger Stone candidate. He’s not ours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kennedy, Williamson, Phillips, etc., need to set up some prime time YouTube debates and let America hear what they have to say.

YouTube won’t have him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kennedy, Williamson, Phillips, etc., need to set up some prime time YouTube debates and let America hear what they have to say.

YouTube won’t have him.

This isn’t disturbing to you? The term ‘anti-vax’ is very disturbing to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kennedy, Williamson, Phillips, etc., need to set up some prime time YouTube debates and let America hear what they have to say.

YouTube won’t have him.

This isn’t disturbing to you? The term ‘anti-vax’ is very disturbing to me.

No, it’s not disturbing to me that businesses get to decide whether they can host lunatics or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kennedy, Williamson, Phillips, etc., need to set up some prime time YouTube debates and let America hear what they have to say.

YouTube won’t have him.

This isn’t disturbing to you? The term ‘anti-vax’ is very disturbing to me.

No, it’s not disturbing to me that businesses get to decide whether they can host lunatics or not.

Who determines who’s a lunatic and why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kennedy, Williamson, Phillips, etc., need to set up some prime time YouTube debates and let America hear what they have to say.

YouTube won’t have him.

This isn’t disturbing to you? The term ‘anti-vax’ is very disturbing to me.

No, it’s not disturbing to me that businesses get to decide whether they can host lunatics or not.

Who determines who’s a lunatic and why?

The business. It’s not a public square, it’s a private business.