Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

Are you drunk or daft? Weinstein? Spacey? Hoffman?

Exactly - which makes it easy for someone who doesn’t want him elected to make accusations at this time.
Color me very skeptical.

So you'll give a pedophile the benefit of the doubt? No wonder they feel like they'll "get away with it." YOU allow it.

And, you will condemn before you have any proof? Two words... Tawana Brawley

+1
I have two more words... Crystal Mangum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

I hope you don't have kids. And if you do, I hope they don't allow their friends around you.

NP here. Do you always believe every accusation, no matter how long ago, no matter that there is zero proof? Seriously? I prefer to listen to all the facts before making a rush to judgment - no matter what the accusation is and regardless of the accuser's gender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember the show Boston Public? Black principal had a 16yo teen daughter who started secretly dating an wealthy like 30-ish yo black guy who drove a new BMW. It wasn't like OMG WHAT A PEDOPHILE !!! From what I recall, the principal of the high school had a civil talk with the guy and told him to get lost.

It doesn't sound like any of this was a secret, he was doing it in front of their parents?

OMFG. Omarosa is posting again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember the show Boston Public? Black principal had a 16yo teen daughter who started secretly dating a wealthy like 30-ish yo black guy who drove a new BMW. It wasn't like OMG WHAT A PEDOPHILE !!! From what I recall, the principal of the high school had a civil talk with the guy and told him to get lost.

It doesn't sound like any of this was a secret, he was doing it in front of their parents?

Boston Public, 2000-2004
33-11
"Chapter Thirty-Three"
January 28, 2002
2ADU11

Ronnie and Danny discover that 16-year-old Brooke is dating a 27-year-old man, Rupert, and report it to her father, Steven. Steven is outraged at this discovery and demands Brooke stop seeing him. She disagrees at first but the next morning, her boyfriend Rupert reports to Steven that the two have broken up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

I hope you don't have kids. And if you do, I hope they don't allow their friends around you.

NP here. Do you always believe every accusation, no matter how long ago, no matter that there is zero proof? Seriously? I prefer to listen to all the facts before making a rush to judgment - no matter what the accusation is and regardless of the accuser's gender.

Just like Trump ... at least when the alleged perpetrator is a white msn with an assault rifle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember the show Boston Public? Black principal had a 16yo teen daughter who started secretly dating a wealthy like 30-ish yo black guy who drove a new BMW. It wasn't like OMG WHAT A PEDOPHILE !!! From what I recall, the principal of the high school had a civil talk with the guy and told him to get lost.

It doesn't sound like any of this was a secret, he was doing it in front of their parents?

Boston Public, 2000-2004
33-11
"Chapter Thirty-Three"
January 28, 2002
2ADU11

Ronnie and Danny discover that 16-year-old Brooke is dating a 27-year-old man, Rupert, and report it to her father, Steven. Steven is outraged at this discovery and demands Brooke stop seeing him. She disagrees at first but the next morning, her boyfriend Rupert reports to Steven that the two have broken up.

Sorry. It’s clearly Jared. Peace in the MidEast is hard work, right big guy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone remember the show Boston Public? Black principal had a 16yo teen daughter who started secretly dating a wealthy like 30-ish yo black guy who drove a new BMW. It wasn't like OMG WHAT A PEDOPHILE !!! From what I recall, the principal of the high school had a civil talk with the guy and told him to get lost.

It doesn't sound like any of this was a secret, he was doing it in front of their parents?

Boston Public, 2000-2004
33-11
"Chapter Thirty-Three"
January 28, 2002
2ADU11

Ronnie and Danny discover that 16-year-old Brooke is dating a 27-year-old man, Rupert, and report it to her father, Steven. Steven is outraged at this discovery and demands Brooke stop seeing him. She disagrees at first but the next morning, her boyfriend Rupert reports to Steven that the two have broken up.

Sorry. It’s clearly Jared. Peace in the MidEast is hard work, right big guy?

Puttin’ that JD from NYU to good use.

[Anonymous]

Anthony Weiner, who sexted with a teenager, is currently serving a 21-month sentence.


Roy Moore, who made sexual advances on a 14-year-old, is currently enjoying an 11-point lead in Alabama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post story has 30 sources. 4 women. On the record. None of whom knew one another. None of whom reached out to The Post to tell their story.

This rings true.

Why not? I would think that they would want to shout it from the rooftops - "that man molested me!" If my molester ever runs for office, the FIRST thing I do is contact the press MYSELF early on and tell my story.

Now I want to know how much they were paid...

And why should anyone believe you that you were molested?

(See how that works?)

Here's the fun part - I don't expect you to believe me. I don't CARE if you believe me. I don't seek YOUR approval. What I DO do? Go to the press. If they don't believe me? So be it. But I'VE done something.

Huh. That's interesting. I'd go to the police.

Keep in mind that Roy Moore was the local prosecutor at the time. Would you still go to the police? Do you think they would help you?

He was the local prosecutor just last week, or whenever these women went to WaPo?

When the incidents occurred. Please keep up.

You missed the point. Why would the women go to the press instead of the police in 2017?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

I hope you don't have kids. And if you do, I hope they don't allow their friends around you.

NP here. Do you always believe every accusation, no matter how long ago, no matter that there is zero proof? Seriously? I prefer to listen to all the facts before making a rush to judgment - no matter what the accusation is and regardless of the accuser's gender.

Sadly, this is why so many predators go unpunished. How can you "prove" that he molested her? It's not like you can use a rape kit even if she had gone to police right away. And what additional "facts" do you expect to come to light? What would be proof for you? A witness?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post story has 30 sources. 4 women. On the record. None of whom knew one another. None of whom reached out to The Post to tell their story.

This rings true.

Why not? I would think that they would want to shout it from the rooftops - "that man molested me!" If my molester ever runs for office, the FIRST thing I do is contact the press MYSELF early on and tell my story.

Now I want to know how much they were paid...

And why should anyone believe you that you were molested?

(See how that works?)

Here's the fun part - I don't expect you to believe me. I don't CARE if you believe me. I don't seek YOUR approval. What I DO do? Go to the press. If they don't believe me? So be it. But I'VE done something.

Huh. That's interesting. I'd go to the police.

Keep in mind that Roy Moore was the local prosecutor at the time. Would you still go to the police? Do you think they would help you?

He was the local prosecutor just last week, or whenever these women went to WaPo?

When the incidents occurred. Please keep up.

You missed the point. Why would the women go to the press instead of the police in 2017?

Statute of limitations have passed. Duh.
But I think the voters of AL deserve to know that a pedophile is in a position to represent their state. Does Alabama want to be known as a lawless haven for pedophiles? Not a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked, SHOCKED that someone who espouses moral superiority and judgement over the sovereignty of others, has sick skeletons in his closet.

Anthony Weiner, is that you? or is this Ted kennedy?

Or Joseph Morrissey? Seems all those Democrats were only too happy to forgive him.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/shameless/2015/08/17/5fb90846-1e70-11e5-bf41-c23f5d3face1_story.html?utm_term=.08b56f2562e6

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anthony Weiner, who sexted with a teenager, is currently serving a 21-month sentence.


Roy Moore, who made sexual advances on a 14-year-old, is currently enjoying an 11-point lead in Alabama.

The takeaway is that using a computer to stoke your perversions is bad.

[Anonymous]

“There’s nothing to see here,” said Jim Zeigler, the state auditor and a longtime supporter of Mr. Moore. “Single man, early 30s, never been married, dating teenage girls. Never been married and he liked younger girls. According to The Washington Post account he never had sexual intercourse with any of them.”

Seems like his friends in Alabama believe the story. It’s just that feeling up 14 yo girls when you’re in your 30s is nothing to comment on.