Bowe Bergdahl

[Anonymous]

Was he convicted of desertion already and I missed it? Until he is convicted of desertion or a similar crime, and/or is dishonorably discharged, his service is honorable.

[Anonymous]

Until he is convicted of desertion or a similar crime, and/or is dishonorably discharged, his service is honorable.

I would say that until he gets an honorable discharge, that his service is in question. You cannot ignore facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^^ are you off your meds again?!!?

actually I agree with everything he said and I'm as liberal as they come.

Say something intelligent. Being a Liberal is not an excuse for being dumb. However, being lazy and dumb are reasons people use ad hominem attacks.

If you can't argue the facts of the case then stay home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Until he is convicted of desertion or a similar crime, and/or is dishonorably discharged, his service is honorable.

I would say that until he gets an honorable discharge, that his service is in question. You cannot ignore facts.

By that measure every KIA is in doubt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Until he is convicted of desertion or a similar crime, and/or is dishonorably discharged, his service is honorable.

I would say that until he gets an honorable discharge, that his service is in question. You cannot ignore facts.

And until we bring him home we can't know.

Therefore the decision was the right one.

[Anonymous]

How is it that people are jumping straight to claims of desertion vs AWOL?

[Anonymous]

Therefore the decision was the right one.

I wish I could be that sure. I am very concerned about those I know in Afghanistan--now, more than ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Therefore the decision was the right one.

I wish I could be that sure. I am very concerned about those I know in Afghanistan--now, more than ever.

There's a war. How much more dangerous can it get for a soldier?

[Anonymous]

How is it that people are jumping straight to claims of desertion vs AWOL?

He sent his things home. He was looking for the Taliban.

[Anonymous]

There's a war. How much more dangerous can it get for a soldier?

Are you serious?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he deserted, he should not receive military benefits. He owes an apology to those that died looking for him and their families,the US. Military, and the American People who may pay for his return. He should be grateful.
I hope he will be able to do something productive with his life after this, otherwise it is a waste.

If he deserted, he should not received benefits, he should be court martialed and suffer whatever penalties one suffers for desertion.

But first he has to be proven guilty. Until then all this is speculation and has no bearing on Obama's decision to swap for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
^^^^ are you off your meds again?!!?


actually I agree with everything he said and I'm as liberal as they come.



Say something intelligent. Being a Liberal is not an excuse for being dumb. However, being lazy and dumb are reasons people use ad hominem attacks.

If you can't argue the facts of the case then stay home.

As a conservative, I only think clearly when I am off my meds.

[Anonymous]

If he deserted, he should not receive military benefits. He owes an apology to those that died looking for him and their families,the US. Military, and the American People who may pay for his return. He should be grateful.
I hope he will be able to do something productive with his life after this, otherwise it is a waste.

See more lies by conservatives, no one died looking for him. All the people listed by conservatives died in operations not relate to Bergdahl search. Maybe people who lie about military personnel should be in jail - aid and comfort to the enemy.

[Anonymous]

How is it that people are jumping straight to claims of desertion vs AWOL?


He sent his things home. He was looking for the Taliban.

Says who? Conservatives? if they talk they lie.

[Anonymous]

no one died looking for him

So, you are calling the soldiers on the ground liars? You'd rather believe Hagel--who has not said with any finality that none were killed? Just sort of waffled?