Trump going on No. 1 podcast Joe Rogan this Friday - per Politico

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

She outlined a number of her policies yet again tonight during her rally.

I really wish you people would actually bother to try to actually know what you're talking about and have honest conversations rather than just spewing empty nonsense like this.

There is a difference between reading a prepared speech and discussing a topic off the cuff with someone, no notes.

There's a difference between discussing policy and going on some senile ramble about Arnold Palmer's penis, sharks, eating cats and dogs, windmill cancer and other bizarre gobbledygook.

I'll take Kamala. You can take senile dementia if you want, but you look like a complete fool for doing so.

That's the biggest problem with Trump - his mind is gone and he is far too arrogant and narcissistic to acknowledge it or let others come in and give him sound advice. He is unfixable and will only get worse.

Harris's problems and deficiencies on the other hand are all fixable.

His mind is gone and he doesn’t listen to others yet he spent the entire podcast namechecking friends’ advice on who to select and he’s too arrogant but he admitted his biggest mistake something Kamala couldn’t do.

Kamala said she made no mistakes and has no regrets and wouldn’t do anything differently.

She is as dense as a plank like GW Bush who even proved to be reflective and self correcting toward the end.

Trump’s famous line is You’re fired and he took that mentality of getting rid of useless employees to the WH and the people he fired didn’t like it but that’s how a fed government should operate. The code of silence and working 50 years doing the same half assed job doesn’t work for Trump.

He brought a fire under everyone and a New York sensibility for no bullshitting and niceties to Washington and it was long overdue

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

She outlined a number of her policies yet again tonight during her rally.

I really wish you people would actually bother to try to actually know what you're talking about and have honest conversations rather than just spewing empty nonsense like this.

There is a difference between reading a prepared speech and discussing a topic off the cuff with someone, no notes.

There's a difference between discussing policy and going on some senile ramble about Arnold Palmer's penis, sharks, eating cats and dogs, windmill cancer and other bizarre gobbledygook.

I'll take Kamala. You can take senile dementia if you want, but you look like a complete fool for doing so.

That's the biggest problem with Trump - his mind is gone and he is far too arrogant and narcissistic to acknowledge it or let others come in and give him sound advice. He is unfixable and will only get worse.

Harris's problems and deficiencies on the other hand are all fixable.

How does the saying go? Can't fix stupid?

(Sorry that was mean to call her stupid even though I don't believe she is brilliant by any means, but you walked right into it)

Interesting that you think someone who has been the Vice President of the USA, a senator, an Attorney General of the most populous state, a district attorney, a prosecutor, etc……….is “stupid.” Are you basing that on her sex or race? Because clearly you are not basing it on her amazing life accomplishments.

She was only Vp because of her race and sex according to the current Pres and she was only DA because of literal sex

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Newsom would have agreed to go on Rogan in a flash.

Harris agreed to go on Rogan.

Rogan is the one having cold feet. It's already been shown and discussed here. Keep up.

Newsom would have agreed to do it in Rogan's studio, for three hours, as is customary. Newsom would have recognized it as the opportunity that it is and jumped at the chance and not come up with reasons to decline.

Sure because Newsom isn't anywhere near as busy out pounding the campaign trails with events in multiple states every day.

If Newsom was the nominee, he would be pounding the campaign trails and doing Rogan for 3 hours in Rogan's studio, which is what someone who wants to win would do.

And Rogan would trot out tons of screengrabs about the homeless-industrial complex AND the RAIL FAIL just as appetizers.

Rogan would have offered a fair interview as he has with the other candidates. Rogan hasn't done gotchas with them. He gives them a chance to detail their policies, something which Newsom would have done and Harris needs to do.

Harris has her policies laid out on her website. Trump has Project 2025 which says the military will be launched against citizens. He can’t even come up with his own policies. How could be lead anyone anywhere?

I want Harris policies and not Trump “policies.”

But does she know what her policies are as outlined on her website? In the Fox interview, she told viewers to read her website. Not helpful. A candidate needs to be able to clearly articulate their policies to a general audience on their own, not referring people to a website. That is why a Rogan interview could be helpful to her candidacy, allowing her to put her policies into clear and plain English for the listener. That is, if she can do that.

She outlined a number of her policies yet again tonight during her rally.

I really wish you people would actually bother to try to actually know what you're talking about and have honest conversations rather than just spewing empty nonsense like this.

There is a difference between reading a prepared speech and discussing a topic off the cuff with someone, no notes.

There's a difference between discussing policy and going on some senile ramble about Arnold Palmer's penis, sharks, eating cats and dogs, windmill cancer and other bizarre gobbledygook.

I'll take Kamala. You can take senile dementia if you want, but you look like a complete fool for doing so.

That's the biggest problem with Trump - his mind is gone and he is far too arrogant and narcissistic to acknowledge it or let others come in and give him sound advice. He is unfixable and will only get worse.

Harris's problems and deficiencies on the other hand are all fixable.

How does the saying go? Can't fix stupid?

(Sorry that was mean to call her stupid even though I don't believe she is brilliant by any means, but you walked right into it)

Interesting that you think someone who has been the Vice President of the USA, a senator, an Attorney General of the most populous state, a district attorney, a prosecutor, etc……….is “stupid.” Are you basing that on her sex or race? Because clearly you are not basing it on her amazing life accomplishments.

First off, it was a joke, lighten up. Second, I don't give a crap about her resume. A lot of people get themselves into positions they aren't really qualified for; I see it every day. Third, it's clear she is not an intellectual as soon as she opens her mouth. She's likely actually pretty book smart but it doesn't translate into being well spoken off the cuff without a teleprompter.

[Anonymous]

JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Has it been released yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

[Anonymous]

Vance Podcast Just dropped, 3 hours!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vance Podcast Just dropped, 3 hours!

YES! I know what I'm listening to tonight!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

Kamala is not understanding new media. I heard it was Baron Trump who was behind the push for Trump (and now Vance) to get on these young bro-centric podcasts. It's a great move. Trump is going to win, I'm afraid, because Kamala is not understanding the impact these podcasts have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

Kamala is not understanding new media. I heard it was Baron Trump who was behind the push for Trump (and now Vance) to get on these young bro-centric podcasts. It's a great move. Trump is going to win, I'm afraid, because Kamala is not understanding the impact these podcasts have.

She didn't go on brocentric podcasts. But she was on The Breakfast Club with Charlemagne the God, which thanks to iheartradio, streams and is popular well outside of Detroit, and Call Her Daddy which is like the 2nd or 3rd most listened to podcast, just behind Rogan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

Kamala is not understanding new media. I heard it was Baron Trump who was behind the push for Trump (and now Vance) to get on these young bro-centric podcasts. It's a great move. Trump is going to win, I'm afraid, because Kamala is not understanding the impact these podcasts have.

More maga fanfic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

She doesn't have the downtime because she is VP??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

She doesn't have the downtime because she is VP??

I thought the Harris supporters claim because she’s only the VP she’s not responsible for anything the Biden administration does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance just did a 4 hour Rogan podcast

Here is what happened with Harris according to Rogan.

Wow, this is so insightful! Joe mentioned that Kamala might struggle because she’s got so many handlers managing everything in the background—she can’t just have a real, unscripted conversation. Is this who we want running the country? Do we even know who Kamala really is? The most striking thing I heard today from a focus group was when they were asked to describe each candidate as an animal. For Trump, they overwhelmingly went with "peacock" (showy). But for Kamala, they said "chameleon" because she keeps changing, and no one really knows where she stands on things. That’s unsettling!

Ridiculous, everything said could be shifted back to Rogan. He's comfy in his home studio, would be off his game if he had to travel. She's the Vice President, she shouldn't have the downtime of JD or Trump. Deal with it, he's being a baby.

Kamala is not understanding new media. I heard it was Baron Trump who was behind the push for Trump (and now Vance) to get on these young bro-centric podcasts. It's a great move. Trump is going to win, I'm afraid, because Kamala is not understanding the impact these podcasts have.

She didn't go on brocentric podcasts. But she was on The Breakfast Club with Charlemagne the God, which thanks to iheartradio, streams and is popular well outside of Detroit, and Call Her Daddy which is like the 2nd or 3rd most listened to podcast, just behind Rogan.

No, is likes 5th

https://podcastcharts.byspotify.com/