| This question is inspired by the recent post on bring at a job too long - how long at a job is to short? What pattern on a resume would indicate a job jumper? |
| a job every six months would be a bad sign |
| Honestly? In looking over resumes, I look for a pattern. A new job every two years- won't touch it. If you are starting out and had 1 or 2 for two years- I would be OK with that, but I look for at least one position for around 5 years for people who have more experience and/or years in the work force. |
What industry are you in? How large is your company? |
| NP here - What about a short stint (1-2 years) after two positions of 6-8 years. I am questioning a job change I made 9 months ago, but hate the idea of throwing in the towel so soon. Work in nonprofit industry. |
|
Every year... I don't see how you can possibly learn everything you need to in a year then move on.
Specialized experience my behind, I've met many who honestly weren't qualified and should had stayed in their previous positions at least an additional year or two. |
This is an interesting point - because it presumes that we are in jobs to learn, rather than to contribute. I know that the two are not mutually exclusive - but what if you're in a job in which you've contributed and done your job, but you have not "learned" anymore than you would at another job? That is staying at Job "A" for years 3 and 4 wouldn't make you any better suited to Job "B" than transitioning to Job "B" after 2 years at Job "A". |
I'm the original poster you quoted. Yes, I agree that in some jobs, you've learned all you could but for my particular field, at least 2-3 would and should be ideal. |
|
I worked at the same org for 12 years but I had a new position/role (steadily increasing responsibility, better titles) every 2-3 years there.
Then I switched to a different nonprofit org and have 2.5 years (one promotion) so far. Am seriously thinking about a high-risk/high-reward job switch that may be amazing or may be a disaster. If it's a disaster, I'll be looking again in a year. That makes me VERY nervous because now I'll have two "short stint" jobs back to back. I think everybody gets ONE pass. You can easily say "Oh that was a mistake from the git-go but I used every opportunity there to learn and contribute meaningfully while also realizing right away that I needed to move on when possible." I don't think you can do that twice in a row. So I worry. |
| pp, a 1 year stint after 12, then 2.5 years wouldn't phase me. Now back to back 1 year stints would be a red flag. |
Perfectly fine to me as someone who works in HR. Sometimes jobs aren't a good fit and you don't have a pattern of constantly changing jobs. Don't stay on a job where you end up being miserable. |
| I think it really depends...My last job was only a year (after 5 at one and 2 years at another) but it was because when I was hired they told me the focus would be X, when it fact, it was an entirely admin job and not what I signed up for. |