Paul Manafort Told to Surrender

[Anonymous]

All the right wing websites seem to be linking Manafort to Podesta since this seemed to occur during the time period he worked for Podesta.

Some on those websites are saying indictment A is Podesta which is why he resigned from his firm today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the right wing websites seem to be linking Manafort to Podesta since this seemed to occur during the time period he worked for Podesta.

Some on those websites are saying indictment A is Podesta which is why he resigned from his firm today.

Hahahahahahahaha no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the right wing websites seem to be linking Manafort to Podesta since this seemed to occur during the time period he worked for Podesta.

Some on those websites are saying indictment A is Podesta which is why he resigned from his firm today.

Could be. I expect we'll find out who/what A is soon enough. If the other sealed cases are Mueller's, we'll find out about them, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rick Gates.

Who is rick Gates?

Manafort's protege and Trump campaign operative.

Source?

really? you couldn't google that? you just thought it was made up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rick Gates.

Who is rick Gates?

Manafort's protege and Trump campaign operative.

Source?

OP's NYT article.

This is what it says about Gates:

Mr. Gates is a longtime protégé and junior partner of Mr. Manafort. His name appears on documents linked to companies that Mr. Manafort’s firm set up in Cyprus to receive payments from politicians and businesspeople in Eastern Europe, records reviewed by The New York Times show.

Where does it say he was “Trump’s campaign operative?"

Really, really?

[Anonymous]

Louise broke it down last night:
https://patribotics.blog/2017/10/29/exclusive-mueller-has-dozens-of-sealed-indictments-including-on-donald-trump/

She's been more right than wrong, despite people - including the owner of this website - calling her fraud. Pretty much everything is playing out as she stated over the past 12 months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

According to the twitterverse Indictment (A) has to be higher profile criminal that "B". Which can only be Trump, Pence or Session.

Anonymous wrote:Could also be Kushner, Ivanka or Don Jr.

It makes me sad to think that it's only one of them. Why can't it be multiple people on the same indictment, the way Manafort and Gates were indicted together?

There are four other sealed indictments. It was revealed on another political site that is password protected. Someone screenshotted it.

So they're leaking grand jury information...lock them up.

They are in a public docket, dombass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All the right wing websites seem to be linking Manafort to Podesta since this seemed to occur during the time period he worked for Podesta.

Some on those websites are saying indictment A is Podesta which is why he resigned from his firm today.

Tony Podesta will likely get charged, but to my knowledge, he doesn't have the decades of baggage that Manafort has

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Louise broke it down last night:
https://patribotics.blog/2017/10/29/exclusive-mueller-has-dozens-of-sealed-indictments-including-on-donald-trump/

She's been more right than wrong, despite people - including the owner of this website - calling her fraud. Pretty much everything is playing out as she stated over the past 12 months.

What on earth is she smoking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louise broke it down last night:
https://patribotics.blog/2017/10/29/exclusive-mueller-has-dozens-of-sealed-indictments-including-on-donald-trump/

She's been more right than wrong, despite people - including the owner of this website - calling her fraud. Pretty much everything is playing out as she stated over the past 12 months.

What on earth is she smoking?

You posted this when she said 12 months ago that their were multiple FISA warrants on Trump campaign staff and that they were colluding with Russia.

Even Jeff said it.

And she has been vindicated. It's pretty clear that her sources are British and other Five Eyes intelligence agencies who have access to the raw intelligence.

[Anonymous]

Robert Mueller arrested Paul Manafort for financial crimes, then reveals Manafort will be charged with Trump-Russia collusion (NBC News: Manafort is one of the unnamed officials in Papadopoulos document) https://twitter.com/PalmerReport/status/925104031415943168

Excellent - the rabbit hole leads to trump pretty fast!

[Anonymous]

Hope they're well stocked up on diapers in the adult daycare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

According to the twitterverse Indictment (A) has to be higher profile criminal that "B". Which can only be Trump, Pence or Session.

Anonymous wrote:Could also be Kushner, Ivanka or Don Jr.

It makes me sad to think that it's only one of them. Why can't it be multiple people on the same indictment, the way Manafort and Gates were indicted together?

There are four other sealed indictments. It was revealed on another political site that is password protected. Someone screenshotted it.

And where is the screenshot. Link or it doesnt exist.

It's a screenshot of PACER. It's on Twitter if you look for it. As far as I know, PACER is not sensitive or confidential information. I'm just a transactional attorney, though, I could be wrong.

What is PACER? When I saw the image it was accompanied by someone asking if anyone else knew how to get in.

Public Access to Court Electronic Records. It's an online database of dockets and filings for the federal courts. www.pacer.gov .

[Anonymous]

Wow, he was really dumb to keep these records.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/manafort-charges-grew-records-seized-no-knock-raid-205539175.html

[Anonymous]

I fail to see how a few grubby soulless swamp creatures being taken down required a special counsel investigation masquerading as a Trump-Russian collusion investigation. Why didn't the FBI-AG take down these schmucks years ago? Why didn't the FBI-AG take down 1,000+ just like them over the last 20 years?

I'm glad to see a few ounces of muck are drained from the swamp, but the exaggerated reaction to this is phony as hell.