Sydney Sweeney / American Eagle Controversy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How old is Sydney Sweeney? The ad looked like child porn to me. Like an Epstein video.

All I saw were her boobs, and those look like they belong to an adult woman. The ad is fine.

She’s 27. Not even close to underage nor do I think there was remotely a hint of that in the ad.

[Anonymous]

The people who care about this a lot are Fox tv hosts bcs it gives them something to talk about while they ignore the epstein files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sweeney has been held up by the right wing as perfect white womanhood. The ad is pandering to that.

We should also note that the red pillers sexualized her as a minor and think she’s stupid because she has big breasts.

I don't know her racial background, but her look isn't even a pure white/Aryan sort of look. She has a very mixed vibe.

Tell us you know nothing about eugenics without telling us.

This woman is literally a Type 1A Aryan. Literally the master race, as nazi scientists defined the bloodline.

Three primary traits:

Blonde hair

Blue eyes

Facial structure featuring squareness in the jawline and high, prominent cheek bones.


She’s as nazi as they come.

But she doesn't look like a natural blonde

Exactly. She's too short to be as PP is pushing "a Type 1A Aryan". She doesn't have a square jawline and prominent cheekbones at all. Her face is soft, will lower positioned juicy cheeks (so nazi! ).

It takes zero effort to be scandalized by dim concepts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The people who care about this a lot are Fox tv hosts bcs it gives them something to talk about while they ignore the epstein files

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The people who care about this a lot are Fox tv hosts bcs it gives them something to talk about while they ignore the epstein files

I’m swear I’m not a big Megyn Kelly watcher. But she was all frothy after the Bezos wedding that SS got invited just because of her boobs. And now a couple weeks later, she busy defending SS’s attractiveness and her boobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nobody actually thinks that mannish thing is more appealing than a curvy blonde hair blue doe eyed big boobed coquet.

I don’t find Rachel Zigler incredibly attractive but neither is Sydney Sweeney. She’s incredibly sexy and hot. Her face is not blue for eyed. If she weren’t blonde and didn’t have those two other assets (which are impressive) she wouldn’t be nearly as popular as she is.

Stage actors don’t have to be as “hot” as television and movie actors. Also Rachel has never been sold as supposedly hot, I don’t know why people are comparing the two out of nowhere. Her talent is being good at musical theater, nobody pays her to do anything else. They really aren’t comparable people.

Rachel is a movie actress- she has played the lead female character in several movies.

Yes but most of her roles require her to sing and or dance, that is what she gets paid for, she doesn’t get paid to be hot. I want to see Rachel vocal frying on a Jeans ad as much as I want to hear Sydney Sweeney attempt to sing lead on West Side Story.

Irony is dead. How dare you criticize Sydney Sweeney’s genes/jeans ad! Let’s all pile on Rachel Ziegler for daring to play Snow White.

The witch was whiter than her.

Hah! You can stop beating the dead horse. Irony is really, truly dead now. No need to continue.

Just stating facts. That’s why the movie flopped, along with her career. It was poor woke casting. And she’s not pretty and the storyline was she’s the most beautiful in all of the land. That’s more subjective though, but she’s definitely not white as snow. Feel bad that role will haunt her for life. Sydney will always have great jeans.

LOL I guess that's the irony part? People who flaunt it with that kind of mean attitide are exactly they type people love, just love, watching get old.

How’s that irony? She will always have great Jeans She did a great ad & will be remembered for it like Cindy Crawford is remembered for the Pepsi ad. How well she ages is irrelevant.

The word is "genes" not "jeans." How do you know she will always have great jeans? Is a lifetime supply part of her pay for doing the ad?

[Anonymous]

SS has great breasts, and she really leans into using them to her advantage. Long term, is that a good decision for her career? Only time will tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Halle Berry has had a long and successful career in Hollywood. If she was praised as "having great genes" I would be more likely to agree, compared to a rather mediocre young actress who hasn't yet proven herself as a success in her field.

This is such a load of BS.

If there was a gorgeous image of Halle Berry looking like... well, Halle Berry... with a tagline 'She has great genes', then most people certainly wouldn't take that as a reference to her proven, decades-long success as a talented thespian.

+1
The hypocrisy isn't just incredibly stupid and obvious, it's also embarrassing. These people would be salivating and applauding if the ad featured Halle Berry or another WOC.

Are they trying to market their jeans to lesbians?

[Anonymous]

The squawking is by misanthropes jealous of her confident, sweet, fun, playful, flirty personality and gorgeous blue yes. Sydney is the charismatic popular girl who also just happened to be gorgeous and also super sweet to everyone that they grew up jealous of. So much so they would manufacture things about her; ex. She's a whore sleeping with the lacrosse team, I just know it! She's fake and I can't believe nobody else sees it!

This fake jeans scandal takes all these insecure miserable people back to high school and college.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The squawking is by misanthropes jealous of her confident, sweet, fun, playful, flirty personality and gorgeous blue yes. Sydney is the charismatic popular girl who also just happened to be gorgeous and also super sweet to everyone that they grew up jealous of. So much so they would manufacture things about her; ex. She's a whore sleeping with the lacrosse team, I just know it! She's fake and I can't believe nobody else sees it!

This fake jeans scandal takes all these insecure miserable people back to high school and college.

She turns people off, unless you are a closet lesbian or a wannabe or a sidekick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

100%

You realize nobody takes you seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

That's a great point. I think the ad would've been much better with a bunch of different women - maybe all 'model' types or even better, women with 'great genes' for a variety of reasons (athlete, scientist, humanitarian, etc.) Thanks for your response.

Agree.

The Benetton advertising of the 80s was more modern and included a variety of people.

[Anonymous]

If the exact same ad featured that hideous astroturfed creature Zendaya, the EXACT same freaks would love it and share it with yessss queen!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't think there's a serious judgment lapse with an ad campaign extolling the "great genes" of a blonde haired blue eyed white woman and literally no one else, I'm not sure what to tell you. There are political figures sieg heiling on stage at political conventions, now is not the time to pretend we've never heard of Nazis.

Sure if they had done it about different women or a lot of random beautiful women it would read differently. Because there wouldn't be a history of violent eugenics behind the message.

That's a great point. I think the ad would've been much better with a bunch of different women - maybe all 'model' types or even better, women with 'great genes' for a variety of reasons (athlete, scientist, humanitarian, etc.) Thanks for your response.

Agree.

The Benetton advertising of the 80s was more modern and included a variety of people.

Yawn. Predictable and boring.