6 days past day 6 transfer and a positive HPT

Anonymous
I realize 6dp6dt is super early to test. I just couldnt wait any longer. What's the liklihood of this being "real"? I did not do a trigger shot so I dont have that to cause a false positive. But I am on all the normal drugs.
Anonymous
I don't think that's super early. The trigger should have cleared. I'd say a congrats is in order!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I realize 6dp6dt is super early to test. I just couldnt wait any longer. What's the liklihood of this being "real"? I did not do a trigger shot so I dont have that to cause a false positive. But I am on all the normal drugs.


The trigger shot is what would give you a false positive on an HPT. If you didn't do a trigger (I assume this is an FET cycle), then I'd say you have a BFP. Congrats!

Anonymous
Thanks! Now i just need ot be sure it's not chemical.
Anonymous
Sounds pretty real to me! Good luck!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Thanks! Now i just need ot be sure it's not chemical.


Yes, the only issue with testing early and getting a BFP. Good luck!
Anonymous
I had a positive HPT at 10 dpo so a BFP for you now is reasonable. Congrats!
Anonymous
Both of my successful pregnancies tested positive on a HPT at 6dp 5dt. So yes, congratulations are in order! Congrats on your BFP.
Anonymous
OP again,

I tested again today. The second line got lighter. Shouldnt it be getting darker? great, now I am worried.
Anonymous
The line might only get darker every other day. There's lots of reasons for a lighter line. I'd say, put down the sticks and wait for beta. They aren't going to tell you anything more at this point and will likely only make you nuts. I speak from experience.
Anonymous
Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?


It depends on how many days between your betas. You can try betabase.com
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?


9000 is way past chemical pregnancy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?


9000 is way past chemical pregnancy.


This is looking really positive, OP!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Op here- a little update. My first beta was 1600 (woohoo) and second beta was 2100. I had my third beta today and it was over 9,000--does that seem unusually high? Am I out of the "chemical pregnancy" risk zone yet?


9000 is way past chemical pregnancy.

+1
Hoping it's going to be good all the way, OP!
post reply Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: