+1 Between electing trump, alternative facts, and vaccine nonsense our nation was already full of morons. Not to mention, social promotion, low test scores when compared to other nations, the amount of illiterate people graduating high school, and so on. |
I prefer the 7th grader still engaging in imaginative play with friends over the 7th grader making TikTok videos dancing in swimsuits. Homeschooled kids do tend to be more sheltered. When my 7th grader started public school she was surprised by the amount of cursing and how much time people spent comparing and gossiping about each other. |
Citation, please... |
Well, let them know that homeschoolers have friends also. |
You had a hard time in statistics class, didn't you? |
Just FYI - secular = smart. Religious people can be smart also. |
* doesn't equal |
True. But religious homeschoolers are the only ones teaching creationism and other nonsenses as science. It’s often religious communities that support banning books. Teaching evolution and letting kids have access to the library just isn’t an issue with secular homeschoolers in the same that it is with religious homeschoolers. That’s reality. |
You do understand that evolution is still a theory right? And what difference does evolution vs creation make in the vast majority of careers anyway? I dont know of a single homeschooler who wants to ban books. In fact, most are pro- textbook and physical book vs the internet and ebooks of mass education. |
A small subset of religious homeschoolers teach creationism. |
Like a small subset of Utah practices polygamy? Yet they decriminalized it just last year. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-polygamy-utah-decriminalized-20200513-64vq5ptw4bf6bi2fkijpfrpchu-story.html |
My issue with homeschooling is that when the students or schools are failing it's not a big secret there are mechanisms in place to track school performance and student performance. Parents on the other hand can let their children play Minecraft all day and call it unschooling and there's no oversight or consequences. |
| My sister homeschooled her kids. This basically meant she taught them things when it struck her fancy which wasn't often. Her 17 year old could read books my 6 year old had mastered. |
https://kutv.com/news/nation-world/baltimore-student-passes-3-classes-in-four-years-ranks-near-top-half-of-class-with-013-g "A shocking discovery came out of a Baltimore high school, where hundreds of students are failing. It’s a school where a student who passed three classes in four years, ranks near the top half of his class with a 0.13 grade point average." How's that "oversight" and "consequences" working out? And homeschoolers have to have their children tested yearly for progress (perhaps not under the religious categorization). The consequence for not meeting standards more than one year is that you have to put them in school. Which would be a great improvement if you lived in Baltimore. |
NP here, and you do understand what a scientific theory is, right? And how this isn't really the knock on evolution you think it is. Also, please tell me how many people in their lifetime don't ever rely on modern medicine...most of which wouldn't be possible if you reject basic foundational evidence that lead to the development of the theory of evolution (e.g. that certain mammals are good models for human physiology, that DNA encodes heredity, etc). |