APS air filters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tons of threads here and on AEM about air filters almost nothing on the lost learning as demonstrated by SOL scores.

But I guess it doesn’t really matter bc all the air filter people aren’t concerned bc it was just those brown kids and their white kids are fine so you know air filters are far more pressing

Haha, It's APE back again pretending to care about brown kids and using brown kids to further their own agenda. So f'in predictable.

and actually air filters are pressing. Air filters = keep kids and teachers in school and keep schools open = teachers can focus on teaching = SOL scores go back up. See how this works?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tons of threads here and on AEM about air filters almost nothing on the lost learning as demonstrated by SOL scores.

But I guess it doesn’t really matter bc all the air filter people aren’t concerned bc it was just those brown kids and their white kids are fine so you know air filters are far more pressing

Haha, It's APE back again pretending to care about brown kids and using brown kids to further their own agenda. So f'in predictable.

and actually air filters are pressing. Air filters = keep kids and teachers in school and keep schools open = teachers can focus on teaching = SOL scores go back up. See how this works?

oh yes air filters are all that’s needed - that will fix everything

oh and my kid is one of the brown kids

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tons of threads here and on AEM about air filters almost nothing on the lost learning as demonstrated by SOL scores.

But I guess it doesn’t really matter bc all the air filter people aren’t concerned bc it was just those brown kids and their white kids are fine so you know air filters are far more pressing

?

Last I checked there was a long thread on SOL results. Maybe you started it since you are so concerned about it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Air lady! Give it a break!

I don’t get the issue with air lady. She’s not advocating for shutting down schools, just making them more safe. The safer schools are the less likely we will get a covid outbreak and the less likely schools will end up shutting down. Isn’t that something we all want to avoid?

I think she is advocating for shutting down schools although she doesn’t use those words. She has zero perspective and thinks she is an expert. Did you catch the Uber hysterical post on arl neighbors?

If you think she's advocating for shutting down schools, that's your own paranoia.

A lot of school have shut down already -- the ones without the things she's advocating for. If you want schools to stay open, stopping opposing things like better ventilation. Unless you just want Covid to spread and that's your agenda, which is what it sounds like.

Arlington has among the highest vaccination rates in the country (and now it's mandated in schools for staff), and has put in more mitigation measures than most school districts, even neighboring ones. I'm confident that our children and staff will be okay. There may be some quarantines, but that's always the risk you took when you signed up for in person school. Even with every mitigation you want in place, you are taking risk. There's only so much Syphax can do with the funding they already have. But I'm happy with what they were able to accomplish, and I feel fine with the mitigation plan in place.

I don't think anyone opposes more mitigation measures necessarily. I even advocated for outdoor lunch at my school, but not as a organized effort with someone giving me talking points and "guidance". Most of us just oppose the incessant "expert"-laden posts and gloom and doom she and her friends constantly post. It's not effective, and like you're seeing here and in other posts, it's backfiring. And I'm saying this as a "normal" parent, not someone affiliated with APE or Open Schools Now.

What is wrong with an organized effort to have lunch outdoors? Isn’t the goal to keep schools open? Wouldn’t lunch outdoors, better filters and open windows help stop the spread of the virus? Yep ventilation lady is crazy but a lot of what she is saying is true. Let’s focus on that.

I think they just need to get out of their own way. Of course most people want schools to be as safe as possible. Ventilation Lady and Outdoor Lunch lady though are drowning the message in hysteria and repetition across several pages. It’s a total turn off. More people may engage if the same people weren’t posting over and over again. They need new messengers who aren’t so… offputting.

So step up and help spread the message.

I did. At my school. Without any of them or their propaganda. I'm not into extremism, so no thank you to both of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ha ha ha, don’t hold your breath. Haters gonna hate with their cowardly anonymous online attacks because that’’s their MO.

So sad that while some parents try to get better safety, others are just haters. But that’s where we are in America in 2021. Look at this very long thread that they keep going. Some parents really hate safety measures in schools and anyone who advocates for them. It would be funny if it wasn’t so very sad.

Hi anon! Hypocrites be hypocrites!

From, anon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tons of threads here and on AEM about air filters almost nothing on the lost learning as demonstrated by SOL scores.

But I guess it doesn’t really matter bc all the air filter people aren’t concerned bc it was just those brown kids and their white kids are fine so you know air filters are far more pressing

?

Last I checked there was a long thread on SOL results. Maybe you started it since you are so concerned about it?

I see a lot of comments on that post about why the tests are not valid and very little concern about what the results show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Air lady! Give it a break!

I thought she was Ventilation Lady or Co2 lady.

But honestly, I am so happy to see a new thread...now gonna read it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Air lady! Give it a break!

I don’t get the issue with air lady. She’s not advocating for shutting down schools, just making them more safe. The safer schools are the less likely we will get a covid outbreak and the less likely schools will end up shutting down. Isn’t that something we all want to avoid?

but she is trying to shut down schools. And she's not an expert. And she's trying to be something she's not .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think ventilation lady loses whatever credibility she has remaining when she posts crap like she just did. She posts delta is more transmissible! 50 percent attack rate from a asymptomatic teacher. She links to a cdc study about Marin county. Did she read it? First paragraph states that the teacher was unvaccinated. 3rd paragraph notes that she took her mask off while reading in the classroom. Further down notes that she was symptomatic and taught for two days with a fever and cough. So a maskless unvaccinated coughing feverish teacher spread covid to 1/2 her students. Shocking.

So…..ignore her posts?

Seems like you should have better things to do with your time.

She "works" from home. Selling paper. Really great/pretty paper. I"ll give her that. Talent in her field.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tons of threads here and on AEM about air filters almost nothing on the lost learning as demonstrated by SOL scores.

But I guess it doesn’t really matter bc all the air filter people aren’t concerned bc it was just those brown kids and their white kids are fine so you know air filters are far more pressing

Haha, It's APE back again pretending to care about brown kids and using brown kids to further their own agenda. So f'in predictable.

and actually air filters are pressing. Air filters = keep kids and teachers in school and keep schools open = teachers can focus on teaching = SOL scores go back up. See how this works?

oh yes air filters are all that’s needed - that will fix everything

oh and my kid is one of the brown kids

and my kid failed an SOL and I think we need to address safety before anyone can hope to regain lost learning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think ventilation lady loses whatever credibility she has remaining when she posts crap like she just did. She posts delta is more transmissible! 50 percent attack rate from a asymptomatic teacher. She links to a cdc study about Marin county. Did she read it? First paragraph states that the teacher was unvaccinated. 3rd paragraph notes that she took her mask off while reading in the classroom. Further down notes that she was symptomatic and taught for two days with a fever and cough. So a maskless unvaccinated coughing feverish teacher spread covid to 1/2 her students. Shocking.

So…..ignore her posts?

Seems like you should have better things to do with your time.

She "works" from home. Selling paper. Really great/pretty paper. I"ll give her that. Talent in her field.

Wow, someone is obsessed. I feel sorry for you. Really. (and I'm a little scared by your stalking and obsession with this one mom).

[Anonymous]

One of the Open Up Now/APE people is on AEM now claiming that the screening tests cause cancer.

No doubt she's complaining to APS.

This is why we can't have nice things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the Open Up Now/APE people is on AEM now claiming that the screening tests cause cancer.

No doubt she's complaining to APS.

This is why we can't have nice things.

In the olden days her big thing was that screens ruin eyeballs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the Open Up Now/APE people is on AEM now claiming that the screening tests cause cancer.

No doubt she's complaining to APS.

This is why we can't have nice things.

You guys wanted to open up full capacity, we're doing that. Why are you lunatics attacking the mitigation and the rational parents who want it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the Open Up Now/APE people is on AEM now claiming that the screening tests cause cancer.

No doubt she's complaining to APS.

This is why we can't have nice things.

In the olden days her big thing was that screens ruin eyeballs.

yeah well that was annoying but harmless. Now she and her friends are anti masks and anti screening testing. Guess we do know she is PRO covid. these APEs. Jeez louise.