Armie Hammer leaked DMs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The messages were real, Armie confirmed it with an audio message that was going around twitter where he directly addressed the messages he wrote. I wonder how much of that stuff he practiced with Elizabeth when they were together...i can only imagine what his kids will think when they Google their dad's name when they're teenagers..

I bet he didn’t practice any of this with her. Hence the divorce.

He once gave an interview in which he said he was into BDSM, but he married a feminist and you can’t pull you wife’s hair. As a feminist and the sexual submissive in my marriage, I read that as he wanted to do a lot more than just pull her hair during play. I think he’s pretty far into dubious consent sadism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Words are words, and dirty talk never really sounds right in the light of day when heard by a third party. These women were consenting adults - shame on them for pulling the “manipulation” card.

+1. Consenting adults, some of whom knowingly participated in cheating and lying, no less.

No kink shaming here. Did he actually hurt anyone? Nope. I think he was just talking fantasies. People have all sorts of fantasies they would never actually want to live out.

He's a scummy cheater though, that much is clear through the texts. How humiliating for Elizabeth (some of the screenshots talk about him having to take performance enhancing drugs to sleep with her).

He says in the DMs that he ate the heart of an animal...

A) He is a liar, clearly.

B) Are we all vegetarians in here?

No but I can’t be the only one who hasn’t cut the heart out of a living animal and eaten it raw and warm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just read his DMs. My first thought is that sexuality is such a strange and private thing, and that many of us have kinks or fantasies that we would never want to act out in real life.
If it’s just an extension of “dirty talk”, in the absence of actual violence I don’t think it’s a huge deal. I mean, if he can’t enjoy regular sex and intimacy, and this actually detailed his marriage, then that would make him a bad candidate for a relationship, but I wouldn’t actually call him a “sicko.”

But if he was abusive and manipulative and scary in his sexual relationships, then that’s another thing.Its clear he was a total d**k, by these wonen’s accounts, and a sexual deviant, but it doesn’t mean he’s dangerous unless he was actually abusive or physically harmed his partners.

According to deux moi (so grain of salt) he ignored safe words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No I just can’t get over how weird his name is. Baking soda.

He's named after his grandfather, who owned a stake in Arm & Hammer (although it was not named after him).

Some people are just idiots. Referring to you, since you're probably to dumb to get that.

What's your name, Lou Zer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No I just can’t get over how weird his name is. Baking soda.

that is his family’s business.

That is actually not true.

Armie Hammer is the great grandson of Armand Hammer. In the 80’s, Armand owned a considerable amount of stock in the company that manufactures Arm and Hammer products. But the product name was in use well before the stock acquisition.

Look, someone reads Wikipedia!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Words are words, and dirty talk never really sounds right in the light of day when heard by a third party. These women were consenting adults - shame on them for pulling the “manipulation” card.

+1. Consenting adults, some of whom knowingly participated in cheating and lying, no less.

No kink shaming here. Did he actually hurt anyone? Nope. I think he was just talking fantasies. People have all sorts of fantasies they would never actually want to live out.

He's a scummy cheater though, that much is clear through the texts. How humiliating for Elizabeth (some of the screenshots talk about him having to take performance enhancing drugs to sleep with her).

He says in the DMs that he ate the heart of an animal...

A) He is a liar, clearly.

B) Are we all vegetarians in here?

No but I can’t be the only one who hasn’t cut the heart out of a living animal and eaten it raw and warm.

Wait what? How did I miss that! That is not "eating the heart of an animal", that's akin to torturing an animal IMO, not nearly the same as eating meat.

[Anonymous]

He also said he wanted to F her actual brain. And other things just as disturbing. UGH. I wish I hadn't read about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The messages were real, Armie confirmed it with an audio message that was going around twitter where he directly addressed the messages he wrote. I wonder how much of that stuff he practiced with Elizabeth when they were together...i can only imagine what his kids will think when they Google their dad's name when they're teenagers..

I bet he didn’t practice any of this with her. Hence the divorce.

He once gave an interview in which he said he was into BDSM, but he married a feminist and you can’t pull you wife’s hair. As a feminist and the sexual submissive in my marriage, I read that as he wanted to do a lot more than just pull her hair during play. I think he’s pretty far into dubious consent sadism.

Says who? That's awful dismissive of women, apparently we can only pick one thing to be into. Sexual preferences means you can't advocate for equality in rights? And this is from someone who kind of rolls her eyes a little at people who are very into kink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The messages were real, Armie confirmed it with an audio message that was going around twitter where he directly addressed the messages he wrote. I wonder how much of that stuff he practiced with Elizabeth when they were together...i can only imagine what his kids will think when they Google their dad's name when they're teenagers..

I bet he didn’t practice any of this with her. Hence the divorce.

He once gave an interview in which he said he was into BDSM, but he married a feminist and you can’t pull you wife’s hair. As a feminist and the sexual submissive in my marriage, I read that as he wanted to do a lot more than just pull her hair during play. I think he’s pretty far into dubious consent sadism.

Says who? That's awful dismissive of women, apparently we can only pick one thing to be into. Sexual preferences means you can't advocate for equality in rights? And this is from someone who kind of rolls her eyes a little at people who are very into kink.

Dude, that is what HE said.

“ Well, if you’re married to a feminist [journalist, restaurateur and actress Elizabeth Chambers] as I am, then it’s…. I don’t know how much we can put here without my parents being embarrassed, but I used to like to be a dominant lover. I liked the grabbing of the neck and the hair and all that. But then you get married and your sexual appetites change. And I mean that for the better—it’s not like I’m suffering in any way. But you can’t really pull your wife’s hair. It gets to a point where you say, “I respect you too much to do these things that I kind of want to do.”

https://dlisted.com/2013/06/19/armie-hammer-respects-his-feminist-wife-too-much-to-pull-her-hair-while-getting-down/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The messages were real, Armie confirmed it with an audio message that was going around twitter where he directly addressed the messages he wrote. I wonder how much of that stuff he practiced with Elizabeth when they were together...i can only imagine what his kids will think when they Google their dad's name when they're teenagers..

I bet he didn’t practice any of this with her. Hence the divorce.

He once gave an interview in which he said he was into BDSM, but he married a feminist and you can’t pull you wife’s hair. As a feminist and the sexual submissive in my marriage, I read that as he wanted to do a lot more than just pull her hair during play. I think he’s pretty far into dubious consent sadism.

Says who? That's awful dismissive of women, apparently we can only pick one thing to be into. Sexual preferences means you can't advocate for equality in rights? And this is from someone who kind of rolls her eyes a little at people who are very into kink.

Dude, that is what HE said.

“ Well, if you’re married to a feminist [journalist, restaurateur and actress Elizabeth Chambers] as I am, then it’s…. I don’t know how much we can put here without my parents being embarrassed, but I used to like to be a dominant lover. I liked the grabbing of the neck and the hair and all that. But then you get married and your sexual appetites change. And I mean that for the better—it’s not like I’m suffering in any way. But you can’t really pull your wife’s hair. It gets to a point where you say, “I respect you too much to do these things that I kind of want to do.”

https://dlisted.com/2013/06/19/armie-hammer-respects-his-feminist-wife-too-much-to-pull-her-hair-while-getting-down/

Classic Madonna/whore complex.

[Anonymous]

Can anyone find a link to the supposed interview where he said he is into BDSM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone find a link to the supposed interview where he said he is into BDSM?

Other than dlisted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The messages were real, Armie confirmed it with an audio message that was going around twitter where he directly addressed the messages he wrote. I wonder how much of that stuff he practiced with Elizabeth when they were together...i can only imagine what his kids will think when they Google their dad's name when they're teenagers..

I bet he didn’t practice any of this with her. Hence the divorce.

He once gave an interview in which he said he was into BDSM, but he married a feminist and you can’t pull you wife’s hair. As a feminist and the sexual submissive in my marriage, I read that as he wanted to do a lot more than just pull her hair during play. I think he’s pretty far into dubious consent sadism.

Says who? That's awful dismissive of women, apparently we can only pick one thing to be into. Sexual preferences means you can't advocate for equality in rights? And this is from someone who kind of rolls her eyes a little at people who are very into kink.

His kink seems to be nonconsent.

[Anonymous]

More than one woman has come forward to say he is abusive.

Here's more:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9138849/Woman-accusing-Armie-Hammer-sending-vile-Dms-claims-starting-talking-2016-Facebook.html

[Anonymous]

For some reason, I read that same article in 2013 (without knowing who he was at the time) and it stayed with me all these years. I got a really "danger" vibe from it, much more than I would have if he had just said he likes to pull hair or whatever.