I live a block from Wisconsin Avenue in FH and know the area quite well. No one will want to live in a single family home on Western Avenue (or Wisconsin) in the heart of a busy commercial area. In fact several of the existing single family homes on Western have already been converted to businesses so I wonder if you've even been paying attention. And speaking of paying attention there was a Giant in the neighborhood until 9 months ago so I'm sort of baffled that someone who lives there wouldn't know that. And densifiers advocate for density. What spells success is leveraging public transportation to enable people to live in "density boxed" whatever the hell that even means near Metro so you add lots of people paying taxes with a minimal impact on demand for public services. Right now Friendship Heights is the opposite - it doesn't have much density but it has a lot of retail that attracts a lot of traffic and doesn't use public transit at the same rates so you get the ills of development with none of the benefits. You might want to actually learn about this stuff instead of spouting ignorant nonsense based on your own baseless fears. |
Everybody is familiar with the awful MD Giant that did not sell wine or beer. Reading is fundamental. Poster never said anything about nine months ago, only that now (When the article was written), they would appreciate a non Amazon option to shop at. That area certainly could take a little more density. This is the perfect opportunity for the density crowd to come up with an award winning solution. Let's hope that they do it. And hopefully they can do it without tearing a bunch of stuff down. |
You live in DC because you hate the suburbs, but you choose to live in one of the most suburban parts of DC that is quite literally a stone's throw from the suburbs you profess to hate. |
|
I actually had no idea that drive throughs were illegal in DC.
Always wondered why the Wisconsin and Van Ness McDonalds did not have a drive through. |
Umm...there are many drive throughs in DC. Van Ness Burger King on Connecticut - Popeys on Georgia Ave to start with... |
|
DP: I don’t want to re-copy such long posts. I’m curious about what the PPs commenting on FH’s lack of density have in mind. Friendship Heights Village, on the MD side of Western, was probably the earliest example in the area of building a dense, high rise community that could take advantage of public transit options. Are those of you describing the lack of density in FH only talking about the DC side of the neighborhood? I have to say that one of the things that makes living in the area attractive is the mixed-density and the green spaces (thank you GEICO!) that balance out the high rises on the MD side.
|
Sigh. Friendship Heights is not suburban at all by most definitions nor is much of Ward 3. It is a walkable neighborhood well served by multiple public transportation options and has an urban street grid and is within walking distance of multiple retail nodes. While the DC side of the line is not very dense the MD side is actually quite dense though interestingly the opposite of urban in its design and layout and there are in fact parts of Ward 3 that are among the densest parts of the District. So in fact FH is not Rockville or any number of other suburban hellscapes where it in fact is difficult to walk anywhere or take public transportation or where there is no density of any kind. But nice try. |
Yup and the existing ones are grandfathered in - no new ones will be approved and that is a good thing. Having said that the Van Ness McDonalds has been around for a while and certainly could have gotten approved for a drive through at some point. |
FH, MD in fact is quite dense - denser than Manhattan actually though it is quite small (I think it is like 16 acres in total). But it is very much car oriented density - all of the buildings are actually 4 story parking decks topped by 16 story residential buildings and all of the units have a lot of parking and are poorly connect to the street and it really isn't a lively or interesting place to walk. I would bet the DC side of the line generates more transit usage than the denser MD side. But that may change as most of the buildings are condos that were built in the 70's and their residents skew heavily older - as those units turn over you may get different patterns of behavior and people who buy there to be within walking distance of the Metro. |
The geico campus is a tragic waste of valuable land and a crime against planning. The gigantic surface parking lot would be better used as literally anything else including a jail, tannery, or slaughterhouse. At least those would bring jobs to the area! In general I find the MD side very unpleasant not because of its high density, but because of its awful suburban street design. It should be a narrow street grid like the DC side. |
Not all of the buildings are the same height. The Carleton looks to be lower and the Willoughby is higher. The more interesting places to walk actually parallel Willard — the park space behind GEICO and the parks behind the buildings on Willard as well as the small area around the community center — something not apparent to someone driving past or even driving through the neighborhood. Many of the people who have cars actually utilize public transportation quite a bit — including the FHV bus that stops at the Metro/bus area. A lot of people — even in the 70’s chose the neighborhood for convenience: walkable shopping and multiple public transportation options. As an example, many older residents might drive to get groceries which have to be carried, but use public transportation for cultural activities downtown or even at the Strathmore. Many younger residents might take the Metro to work pre-Covid, but use their cars on the weekends and for social and recreational activities. So the parking continues to be about having multiple, flexible options. (Which has become even more critical given Metro service cuts) |
| I can tell you as someone that used to work in real estate in that area 12 years ago. The neighbors fought every single new development, including a five story condo building-they fought taht for years. THen the market fell apart and developer sold it to pepco for a substation on top of the metro. A huge land use plan was created with community input to add more density around metro station etc- retail dies without enough "heads in beds" of the right populatiuon. Nope, that got killed off too. Ward 3 Vision was created by the community members who were sick of a small minority fighting everything. What the myopic folks of Friendship Heights don't see if that now there are dozens of other,better, cooler commercial options in DC. For too long they coasted thinking they were the only game in town. But its not 1985. The area is aging in people, and stores. |
The GEICO campus is a truly welcome oasis of green space for the people who live in an extremely dense area of high rises. I’ve lived in both Manhattan and FHV — and what makes it livable is the proximity to green spaces and low rise buildings like the GEICO campus — which, not incidentally, houses lots and lots of jobs. I’m curious. PP: Where do you live? If you’re living in a SFH with your own yard, you might not fully appreciate what it’s like to be quarantined in an apartment, surrounded by other apartments, without a scrap of nature. Proximity to green space actually has health benefits, Unless you’re living next to a tannery, a jail, or a slaughterhouse yourself, you might like the standing for your - um - proposals. I say this as someone who remembers the area west of Chelsea way before High Line. Animal carcasses swaying from hooks really is probably not a better use for a surface parking lot that at least provides visual relief and welcome space for the community, especially during weekends. |
Then it is an oasis for people who don't know the neighborhood they claim to be living in. The predominant feature of the Geico property is its large surface parking lots. Of course if you live there then you should now that literally immediately adjacent to the Geico property is Brookdale park which has lots of mature trees, shade and an actual playground. And a block further west along Willard is the Willard Avenue Park which has trails, a creek, a basketball court and another playground! And a couple of blocks further away across Western is Ft Bayard park. So no the greenspace on the Geico property is really not of much utility if you know the neighborhood and environmentally it does nothing to make up for the much larger surface parking lots which are terrible for the environment. |
PP: Yes, I know where these parks are. I also get to see the trees and lawns and fountains on the GEICO property from my apartment windows, and look forward to the days when it snows and neighborhood families bring their sleds to play on the GEICO hill. I also appreciate the large surface parking lots where many teens get their first driving lessons and multiple community activities take place. Wow! Different people in different circumstances with different resources appreciate different things. Who knew! Shrug |