| I am glad he is being more cautious but I don't agree with him opening up the restaurants and other places when we are spiking. |
We aren’t spiking. |
| I wanted Floreen tbh |
Eh, Floreen is mean, but she’s organized and gets the big picture. Elrich sits in his office all day with the union hacks. Clueless about anything else. |
| Can we all agree that Robin Ficker would have been a disaster |
|
Just listened to the weekly MoCo Covid press briefing and this is why I like Marc Elrich:
He KNOWS people want an "everything back to normal, hooray!" date and he KNOWS that's not how it works. The politician-y thing to do would be to make a promise and give an arbitrary date, and then either sweep risks under the rug, or renege on the promise and push it back. So he'll take the mud people sling at him for not providing a date on certain things, deferring to the data and trends. This also provides an incentive for people to keep wearing masks, etc and following the rules so that the trends continue to go in the right direction so that we CAN open up. Elrich, at age 70, has been there/done that when it comes to politics, he has no future aspirations so he just makes the right decisions, not the political decisions. - OP. |
LOL |
+1 I like it when I know someone else is making the right decisions for us so we don't have to worry about it, or about their motivations. The virus is a huge inconvenience. Let those in charge decide when and how to open up based on what's best for us, not based on reelection chances (like the orange you-know-who, who clearly doesn't care about the health of others, not even his own base). |
You're delusional. We're doing the opposite of spiking. There was no need for us to open more slowly than the rest of the state. No county in MD is experiencing a spike right now. |
The County Executive's message tody provides an example of what I find frustrating with his response to the pandemic.
Look, I don't think we're ready to go to phase 3. We just moved to phase 2, and there's still a handful of things that will be reopening in the coming days, or as part of a phase 2B reopening, and we're certainly going to want to give that some time to see where the trends go. So, I don't blame him for not setting a date. It's too early for that. But his message provides no value. It offers no view into his decision-making process. Is he just looking for time in the status quo? If so, he should say that, and set some expectations for what the time period would be. Does he want to see regional trends meeting following the same trends? National trends? Is it enough to maintain a plateau, or does he want to see further decreasing metrics (and if so, which ones)? What sort of things will remain closed until there's a vaccine? And what sorts of things might reopen until a phase 2B? I realize that the decision is likely to be somewhat subjective based on looking at several factors. That's fine, but he should acknowledge that. There's so many things he could say without suggesting any sort of date for Phase 3. But instead he's been quite secretative about his decision-making process. |
I totally agree with you. Also GGW is YIMBY to everything. That's just developer propaganda. Their view is all growth is better than the status quo and the funny part I'm for growth just not cutting corners or being wasteful. |
PS I will turn on him in a heartbeat if he tries to raise property taxes. |
Well, he did! In the FY21 operating budget. But Council nixed it. |
| I wanted Nancy Floreen!!! |