Secret Service spent $10 million on Melania's NYC security...for a pre-nup battle

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well she probably looked at Tiffany, compared her to the first litter of three, and decided she doesn't want Barron to end up like Tiffany.

Who names their kid Tiffany? Height of vulgarity.

I'd never name my kid Tiffany but... she seems to be the one with the most independent get-up-and-go (with an asterisk for Barron, where it's too early to tell). Tiffany is working on a law degree at Georgetown. Meanwhile Ivanka and the rest of them waltzed into Penn via family connections and then waltzed into mega-bucks sinecures in the family business.

Tiffany also went to Penn for undergrad. Seriously doubt she attained that all on her own.

[Anonymous]

I'm a lib and I don't blame her a bit.

We need to LEARN from this experiences. What are we going to allow and what are we going to require from a POTUS candidate? Things like divesting business interests and investments, disclosing tax returns, no self dealing (hosting things at your own hotel), no charging the secret service to stay in your property, passing a detailed background check, no nepotism, no refusing to move to the Presidential residence, limits on vacation costs and frequency, etc. etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well she probably looked at Tiffany, compared her to the first litter of three, and decided she doesn't want Barron to end up like Tiffany.

Who names their kid Tiffany? Height of vulgarity.

I'd never name my kid Tiffany but... she seems to be the one with the most independent get-up-and-go (with an asterisk for Barron, where it's too early to tell). Tiffany is working on a law degree at Georgetown. Meanwhile Ivanka and the rest of them waltzed into Penn via family connections and then waltzed into mega-bucks sinecures in the family business.

Tiffany also went to Penn for undergrad. Seriously doubt she attained that all on her own.

Pp here and I know. But you don’t get into Georgetown Law because of your family. Or do you?

Anyway, I’m not fan-girling or anything. It’s just that she has to keep studying to stay there. I doubt any of the others would put their noses to actual grindstones for several years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well she probably looked at Tiffany, compared her to the first litter of three, and decided she doesn't want Barron to end up like Tiffany.

Who names their kid Tiffany? Height of vulgarity.

I'd never name my kid Tiffany but... she seems to be the one with the most independent get-up-and-go (with an asterisk for Barron, where it's too early to tell). Tiffany is working on a law degree at Georgetown. Meanwhile Ivanka and the rest of them waltzed into Penn via family connections and then waltzed into mega-bucks sinecures in the family business.

Tiffany also went to Penn for undergrad. Seriously doubt she attained that all on her own.

Pp here and I know. But you don’t get into Georgetown Law because of your family. Or do you?

Anyway, I’m not fan-girling or anything. It’s just that she has to keep studying to stay there. I doubt any of the others would put their noses to actual grindstones for several years.

I think it’s notable that both Ivanka and Eric went to Georgetown undergrad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/political-debate-and-negotiation/

This is totally Trump!

My fever-dream is that it is with Putin

He has a 36 year old ex-gymnast girlfriend. I doubt this would ever happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a lib and I don't blame her a bit.

We need to LEARN from this experiences. What are we going to allow and what are we going to require from a POTUS candidate? Things like divesting business interests and investments, disclosing tax returns, no self dealing (hosting things at your own hotel), no charging the secret service to stay in your property, passing a detailed background check, no nepotism, no refusing to move to the Presidential residence, limits on vacation costs and frequency, etc. etc.

Butter EMAILS!

[Anonymous]

What a completely sexist thread on Melania. We elect a President; we have expected his woman to come aling and work for the US People for free for 4-8 years. That’s nuts. Nobody elected Melania, and the USG doesn't pay her squat. So, as far as I’m concerned no First Lady should feel obliged to show up at the White House.

If Bernie were President and Jane wanted to keep practicing medicine (or bankrupting colleges) in VT for 8 years, that’s her choice.

Women are no longer free labor at the disposal of their husband’s employer.

And if a man’s job endangers his family (whoever they might be), they deserve police protection. And if that man is the president, doubly so, because their safety or endangerment can be a pressure point on a president.

And, please, stop calling her a wh$&@. She’s demanding that her contribution to the marriage and family and her efforts on behalf of him be fairly valued and that her child be treated equally to his half-siblings. Not unreasonable demands.

Signed,
A Trump family hater who voted for Her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the Post article.

She had already been looking out for Barron’s future by making sure he had dual citizenship in Slovenia, which will position him to work in Europe for the Trump Organization when he comes of age.

How is this even legal!?

Why not? Plenty of countries allow dual citizenship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well she probably looked at Tiffany, compared her to the first litter of three, and decided she doesn't want Barron to end up like Tiffany.

Who names their kid Tiffany? Height of vulgarity.

he is as superlative as he thinks in some areas

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a completely sexist thread on Melania. We elect a President; we have expected his woman to come aling and work for the US People for free for 4-8 years. That’s nuts. Nobody elected Melania, and the USG doesn't pay her squat. So, as far as I’m concerned no First Lady should feel obliged to show up at the White House.

That's fine but then they shouldn't expect tax payer paid security. The exposure is something you sign up for when you and your spouse decide to run for office. If your spouse does something like this against your wishes, it's time for a divorce. Not our fault, not our problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a completely sexist thread on Melania. We elect a President; we have expected his woman to come aling and work for the US People for free for 4-8 years. That’s nuts. Nobody elected Melania, and the USG doesn't pay her squat. So, as far as I’m concerned no First Lady should feel obliged to show up at the White House.

If Bernie were President and Jane wanted to keep practicing medicine (or bankrupting colleges) in VT for 8 years, that’s her choice.

Women are no longer free labor at the disposal of their husband’s employer.

And if a man’s job endangers his family (whoever they might be), they deserve police protection. And if that man is the president, doubly so, because their safety or endangerment can be a pressure point on a president.

And, please, stop calling her a wh$&@. She’s demanding that her contribution to the marriage and family and her efforts on behalf of him be fairly valued and that her child be treated equally to his half-siblings. Not unreasonable demands.

Signed,
A Trump family hater who voted for Her.

Then let her pay for her own security. Let them all pay for their own security. Then can live wherever the eff they want then.

And eff the tennis pavilion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a completely sexist thread on Melania. We elect a President; we have expected his woman to come aling and work for the US People for free for 4-8 years. That’s nuts. Nobody elected Melania, and the USG doesn't pay her squat. So, as far as I’m concerned no First Lady should feel obliged to show up at the White House.

If Bernie were President and Jane wanted to keep practicing medicine (or bankrupting colleges) in VT for 8 years, that’s her choice.

Women are no longer free labor at the disposal of their husband’s employer.

And if a man’s job endangers his family (whoever they might be), they deserve police protection. And if that man is the president, doubly so, because their safety or endangerment can be a pressure point on a president.

And, please, stop calling her a wh$&@. She’s demanding that her contribution to the marriage and family and her efforts on behalf of him be fairly valued and that her child be treated equally to his half-siblings. Not unreasonable demands.

Signed,
A Trump family hater who voted for Her.

That's nuts. We expect first ladies to not have any paid employment because we realize there is no way that the wife of the sitting president hold outside employment and NOT receive preferential treatment or be treated fairly at all. Not to mention that the protection to which they are entitled would create massive pressures on their employers or customers.

Yes they deserve safety, and that's why they have the whole building at their disposal that can guarantee safety. It's called the White House - maybe you've heard of it?

As for the whore business - eh, I think their marital arrangements are their own business. But it's not unreasonable to say - Melania, you weren't really a model (as no evidence exists of your modeling) and you didn't come to the U.S. till 26 or so; you didn't meet Trump till 28 or thereabouts, so how exactly did your bills get paid? We all know pretty girls without rich families or jobs, and it's typically not a secret where their daily calories and shelter come from. Know what I mean? It's not unreasonable to guess at what she did to keep the train moving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well she probably looked at Tiffany, compared her to the first litter of three, and decided she doesn't want Barron to end up like Tiffany.

Who names their kid Tiffany? Height of vulgarity.

Well, Marla Maples was not exactly the height of class when she had an affair with Trump while he was married and declared that he (Trump) was “the best sex I ever had” to the NY Post.

Sorry to put that image in everyone’s heads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well she probably looked at Tiffany, compared her to the first litter of three, and decided she doesn't want Barron to end up like Tiffany.

Who names their kid Tiffany? Height of vulgarity.

Well, Marla Maples was not exactly the height of class when she had an affair with Trump while he was married and declared that he (Trump) was “the best sex I ever had” to the NY Post.

Sorry to put that image in everyone’s heads.

LOL!! It was Lresident Trump who declared that because he wanted to be seen that way.

He has been lying to the press for decades.

He even had a fake publicist name “John Barron” and then named his son Barron.

In case you do not get it, Trump WAS his publicist John Barron. Rotflmao!

Trump was a master manipulator of the press.