Church shooting in TX

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I'm in that church, I prefer not to rely on police response time.

I understand. But there is a better option. That is to have strict gun control - permitting guns on a need to own basis.

And all the better if "need" is never found, therefore no one gets a gun. At least not anyone who isn't a high profile individual with understandable security concerns.

These far left nutjobs keep amazing me. Only the wealthy should be afforded the right to own firearms?

That's a right wing POV, actually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I'm in that church, I prefer not to rely on police response time.

I understand. But there is a better option. That is to have strict gun control - permitting guns on a need to own basis.

And all the better if "need" is never found, therefore no one gets a gun. At least not anyone who isn't a high profile individual with understandable security concerns.

These far left nutjobs keep amazing me. Only the wealthy should be afforded the right to own firearms?

That's a right wing POV, actually.

Huh?

[Anonymous]

How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I'm in that church, I prefer not to rely on police response time.

I understand. But there is a better option. That is to have strict gun control - permitting guns on a need to own basis.

And all the better if "need" is never found, therefore no one gets a gun. At least not anyone who isn't a high profile individual with understandable security concerns.

These far left nutjobs keep amazing me. Only the wealthy should be afforded the right to own firearms?

That's a right wing POV, actually.

Uhhh not at all princess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

Devoid of logic and reason I see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

So, you are ok with the wealthy and the celebrities owning guns but the general populace not having that right?

[Anonymous]

That video is f*ing heartbreaking.

...those poor men.

The only way this will stop is for us to vote out the those impeding gun control.

VOTE PEOPLE!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

Everybody please read this. This is what the progressives think about gun control, it is truly terrifying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If I'm in that church, I prefer not to rely on police response time.

I understand. But there is a better option. That is to have strict gun control - permitting guns on a need to own basis.

The Venezuelan government took the guns from the people back in 2012. Now, they're shooting them.

2A is not a need to own amendment.

Bottom line: you aren't getting the guns. Ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

So, you are ok with the wealthy and the celebrities owning guns but the general populace not having that right?

This is socialism - elites have what commoners don’t.

[Anonymous]

Wow, lots of attempts to spin this politically on the left and right. Unfortunately, they are both wrong.

Democrats: Good guy with a gun stopped alot of people from being killed. Until you acknowledge that fact, you sound dumb.

Republicans: Two innocent people were still killed. This isn't a win for guns. And you sound stupid when you claim it is.

You know what would be refreshing? If someone admitted that they have no idea why mass shootings occur or how to stop them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, lots of attempts to spin this politically on the left and right. Unfortunately, they are both wrong.

Democrats: Good guy with a gun stopped alot of people from being killed. Until you acknowledge that fact, you sound dumb.

Republicans: Two innocent people were still killed. This isn't a win for guns. And you sound stupid when you claim it is.

You know what would be refreshing? If someone admitted that they have no idea why mass shootings occur or how to stop them.

Back in the old days, in the "lawless" Wild West, towns had gun checks as soon as you entered. You would check your guns, like you check your coat nowadays. Shootings inside towns were virtually unheard of.

We've forgotten that common sense idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

Everybody please read this. This is what the progressives think about gun control, it is truly terrifying.

Aw, what’s terrifying, snowflake? Common sense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How about the left politicians who own guns, or higher up enough to go out and about with security detail who have guns?

Until such time as one of them becomes a spree killer or orders their security detail to commit a mass shooting, I'm ok with them keeping their guns. What I'm not ok with is Joe Sixpack trumptard keeping his. Because he's shown he can't be trusted.

But I'm ok with Warren Buffett or Mark Zuckerberg having guns. Or bodyguards with guns. They aren't going to shoot me while I'm at Temple.

So, you are ok with the wealthy and the celebrities owning guns but the general populace not having that right?

I thought I made that clear. Are you really that dense that you just asked that?