Why can't Princess Beatrice fix her teeth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she’s happy with how she looks? You should take a page from her book. She’s fine just the way she is.

Absolutely agree.
OP is immature I guess.

OP is a middle aged mean girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she’s happy with how she looks? You should take a page from her book. She’s fine just the way she is.

Absolutely agree.
OP is immature I guess.

OP is a middle aged mean girl.

You don’t sound like a prize yourself with your ageist comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Ferguson was not a good looking woman. Her daughters look like her. They can dress better, get better hairstyles, get a make over - but they don't and they look comical.

If you look at the BRF, they all are awkward looking women who are very plain and horse faced - and it was alright before the age of 24/7 coverage by TV and internet.

With the advent of TV and mass media, we started to notice better than average royals, like the young princess Margaret. Diana was the first royal who became a huge celebrity because of her stunning looks and fashion choices. Now we expect the royal women to look stunning - especially with the access to money, stylists, makeup, clothes and hair. (Not to mention plastic surgery). Stunning women like Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle are now known for their beauty, poise and fashion sense. The comparison is absolutely natural, as Beatrice and Eugene also have access to the same resources, but look dowdy and comical. It comes across as stupid and lazy.

Not really a fair comparison. Diana, Megan, and Kate all married into the BRF and not saddled with BRF appearance genes whereas Beatrice and Eugenie were born into that gene pool. Of course royals are going to choose to marry beautiful women. While Beatrice and her sister could maybe do a little more to improve their looks; comparing people blesses with great genetics to those without is not apples to apples.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she’s happy with how she looks? You should take a page from her book. She’s fine just the way she is.

Absolutely agree.
OP is immature I guess.

OP is a middle aged mean girl.

You don’t sound like a prize yourself with your ageist comment.

Calling someone middle aged is factual not an insult. Bless your heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she’s happy with how she looks? You should take a page from her book. She’s fine just the way she is.

Absolutely agree.
OP is immature I guess.

OP is a middle aged mean girl.

You don’t sound like a prize yourself with your ageist comment.

Calling someone middle aged is factual not an insult. Bless your heart.

But you have no idea how old OP is, so it's not factual. It's you ascribing nasty behavior to the middle-aged, which is ageist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she’s happy with how she looks? You should take a page from her book. She’s fine just the way she is.

Absolutely agree.
OP is immature I guess.

OP is a middle aged mean girl.

You don’t sound like a prize yourself with your ageist comment.

Calling someone middle aged is factual not an insult. Bless your heart.

Lol at “factual.” You don’t even know OP. She could be in her 20’s, so I can only assume the “middle aged” part was thrown out as an insult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she’s happy with how she looks? You should take a page from her book. She’s fine just the way she is.

Absolutely agree.
OP is immature I guess.

OP is a middle aged mean girl.

You don’t sound like a prize yourself with your ageist comment.

Calling someone middle aged is factual not an insult. Bless your heart.

But you have no idea how old OP is, so it's not factual. It's you ascribing nasty behavior to the middle-aged, which is ageist.

+1. Just posted almost the same thing without seeing your comment!

[Anonymous]

She looks fine, sometimes pretty. She doesn't look like Kate, but Kate also doesn't have royal blood. Lets face it, good looks don't run in the royal family. She looks healthy and happy. It isn't as it she has rotten or missing teeth.

[Anonymous]

She has very deep-set eyes and appears not to know that you cannot wear such dark eye makeup with deep set eyes, you look like skeletor. She would look much better in photos if she tried to work with her own face instead of against it

[Anonymous]

Her fiancé is very handsome. And he was engaged and has a child with a gorgeous woman.

Looks are everything, but they do matter a lot. I would be highly suspicious of his marriage motives. I can’t help but to think this marriage will be doomed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She has very deep-set eyes and appears not to know that you cannot wear such dark eye makeup with deep set eyes, you look like skeletor. She would look much better in photos if she tried to work with her own face instead of against it

Agreed. She's got lots of potential, just is stuck using the same eye-makeup as her sister when their faces and coloration are so different

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her fiancé is very handsome. And he was engaged and has a child with a gorgeous woman.

Looks are everything, but they do matter a lot. I would be highly suspicious of his marriage motives. I can’t help but to think this marriage will be doomed.

I find this typo highly amusing.

What’s Anne’s daughter’s name? Zara? She’s a handsome woman and she has the Windsor gene pool too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sarah Ferguson was not a good looking woman. Her daughters look like her. They can dress better, get better hairstyles, get a make over - but they don't and they look comical.

If you look at the BRF, they all are awkward looking women who are very plain and horse faced - and it was alright before the age of 24/7 coverage by TV and internet.

With the advent of TV and mass media, we started to notice better than average royals, like the young princess Margaret. Diana was the first royal who became a huge celebrity because of her stunning looks and fashion choices. Now we expect the royal women to look stunning - especially with the access to money, stylists, makeup, clothes and hair. (Not to mention plastic surgery). Stunning women like Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle are now known for their beauty, poise and fashion sense. The comparison is absolutely natural, as Beatrice and Eugene also have access to the same resources, but look dowdy and comical. It comes across as stupid and lazy.

Not really a fair comparison. Diana, Megan, and Kate all married into the BRF and not saddled with BRF appearance genes whereas Beatrice and Eugenie were born into that gene pool. Of course royals are going to choose to marry beautiful women. While Beatrice and her sister could maybe do a little more to improve their looks; comparing people blesses with great genetics to those without is not apples to apples.

This, it's not her fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her fiancé is very handsome. And he was engaged and has a child with a gorgeous woman.

Looks are everything, but they do matter a lot. I would be highly suspicious of his marriage motives. I can’t help but to think this marriage will be doomed.

I find this typo highly amusing.

What’s Anne’s daughter’s name? Zara? She’s a handsome woman and she has the Windsor gene pool too.

If by handsome you mean “literally looks like a man,” I agree with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It looks that at one point her teeth were more fixed but moved to protrude more. That is why you need to wear a retainer for most of your life. But, she should have had much more work done, too many, too huge teeth. PP is right, Hapsburg jaw.

yes, agreed

I have teeth/mouth like hers. She should have had a palate expander when she was younger. My DD, who has the same mouth/teeth I've got, had one before she got her braces and it made all the difference. It looks so much better.

But! I also think she has a lot of personality that makes up for whatever 'lack' of beauty some perceive in her.