Republican threatens Beto O'Rourke over gun confiscation pledge

[Anonymous]

Total snowflake and loser. He is nobody and needs a gun to get some attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went to a gun store in Fairfax a few minutes ago and they are completely sold out of AR15s. I decided it was probably time to buy one while we can still get them, and they're already gone. The man at the store said there were people waiting in the parking lot when they opened this morning. He said one couple bought six, at a thousand dollars each.

The debate last night was the best to happen to that gun store owner since the latest school massacre, huh?

Too bad schools don’t have the armed guards our elected officials do. Too bad out school kids don’t have security our government buildings have.

Have you ever been to a high school building?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Good. He will be prosecuted.

Beto has zero right to go to this man’s house and take his weapon. If he tried to do so, he, Beto, would be shot or prosecuted.

Beto has no right or authority to enter anyone’s home and take ANYTHING.

He’s the criminal for threatening to take people’s guns.

If he was president. And there was a ban on these weapons with a buyback provision, he would be following the law. Or more likely, the ATF would be enforcing the law.

"Buy back?"
The government did not sell these people their weapons to begin with. How can they "buy them back?"

You've never heard of a buyback? It's done wonders in Australia.
https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback

"Australia confiscated 650,000 guns. Murders and suicides plummeted."

Suicides and murders were on a downwards trend before buybacks.
Australian Bureau of Statistics data show that the annual rate of gun deaths fell from 5 per 100,000 in 1980 to 2.7 per 100,000 in 1995. The first buyback was in 1996.

How many firearms are left in circulation?

[Anonymous]

DC has done buybacks. This isn't a new or untested idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Good. He will be prosecuted.

Beto has zero right to go to this man’s house and take his weapon. If he tried to do so, he, Beto, would be shot or prosecuted.

Beto has no right or authority to enter anyone’s home and take ANYTHING.

He’s the criminal for threatening to take people’s guns.

If he was president. And there was a ban on these weapons with a buyback provision, he would be following the law. Or more likely, the ATF would be enforcing the law.

"Buy back?"
The government did not sell these people their weapons to begin with. How can they "buy them back?"

You've never heard of a buyback? It's done wonders in Australia.
https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback

"Australia confiscated 650,000 guns. Murders and suicides plummeted."

Suicides and murders were on a downwards trend before buybacks.
Australian Bureau of Statistics data show that the annual rate of gun deaths fell from 5 per 100,000 in 1980 to 2.7 per 100,000 in 1995. The first buyback was in 1996.

How many firearms are left in circulation?

The US currently stands at 14 suicides per 100,000, and 61% involve a firearm. Maybe we should try to reduce that somehow?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

Come in my house and try to perform an illegal act and I won’t let you? How threatening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I highly doubt they were “threats.” Promises more likely.

Good. He will be prosecuted.

Beto has zero right to go to this man’s house and take his weapon. If he tried to do so, he, Beto, would be shot or prosecuted.

Beto has no right or authority to enter anyone’s home and take ANYTHING.

He’s the criminal for threatening to take people’s guns.

If he was president. And there was a ban on these weapons with a buyback provision, he would be following the law. Or more likely, the ATF would be enforcing the law.

"Buy back?"
The government did not sell these people their weapons to begin with. How can they "buy them back?"

You've never heard of a buyback? It's done wonders in Australia.
https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback

"Australia confiscated 650,000 guns. Murders and suicides plummeted."

Suicides and murders were on a downwards trend before buybacks.
Australian Bureau of Statistics data show that the annual rate of gun deaths fell from 5 per 100,000 in 1980 to 2.7 per 100,000 in 1995. The first buyback was in 1996.

How many firearms are left in circulation?

The US currently stands at 14 suicides per 100,000, and 61% involve a firearm. Maybe we should try to reduce that somehow?

you can also prevent that by mandating 24 hr monitoring of every individual in the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

Come in my house and try to perform an illegal act and I won’t let you? How threatening.

If it wasn’t threatening it would still be on Twitter. The campaign also reported it to the FBI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

Come in my house and try to perform an illegal act and I won’t let you? How threatening.

If it wasn’t threatening it would still be on Twitter. The campaign also reported it to the FBI.

Haha, i've always imagined liberals as self important hall monitors, and this is proving itself out more and more. It is easy to act all tough until you meet someone with a spine, then you go off to cry to the nearest authority.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

Come in my house and try to perform an illegal act and I won’t let you? How threatening.

It would be illegal to not comply with the law. If anyone's the criminal here, it's you. "Maroon".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

Come in my house and try to perform an illegal act and I won’t let you? How threatening.

You are alerting the FBI about a hypothetical crime whilst crying like a baby. Robert Francis is a loser who will never win in TX again.


It would be illegal to not comply with the law. If anyone's the criminal here, it's you. "Maroon".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the FBI is investigating a crime that would take place IF Beto were president? Hahahahahahahahahahaha! Ha! Haha! Ha! What a bunch of maroons.

Who exactly is the "maroon" here?

The people who think this is a threatening crime. It’s based on a hypothetical and highly unlikely that Robert Francis will ever be president.

Unless the FBI has a time machine and goes forward in time to investigate.

No, that's how you're interpreting it. The actual deleted-by-Twitter tweet isn't based on the faint possibility that Beto would be president. It's just a plain-old threat. Or "statement".

Come in my house and try to perform an illegal act and I won’t let you? How threatening.

If it wasn’t threatening it would still be on Twitter. The campaign also reported it to the FBI.

Haha, i've always imagined liberals as self important hall monitors, and this is proving itself out more and more. It is easy to act all tough until you meet someone with a spine, then you go off to cry to the nearest authority.

*whiny voice* “Hello FBI? This is Robert Francis. Some guy on twitter won’t participate in my mental masturbation. Can you give him a boo-boo?”

[Anonymous]

"some guy on twitter" is a US congressman.